Please see the final schematic for this design (with all errors corrected) in the sticky post at the top of this section ->
Original Minipulse Project Details
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Replies to Original Minipulse Project Details
Collapse
X
-
The MC14538BCP has pins 1, 8 and 15 connect to -5V.Originally posted by Tepco View PostFew issues with 4538 connection on mini PCB. Pins 8,1,15 are Vss
So this is correct.
I also noticed this. The original PCB designer assumed pins 1, 8 and 15 are internally connected in the chip, which is true, but it is good practice to explicitly connect them to -5V.Originally posted by Tepco View Posttiming capacitor goes from pin 2 or 14 toVss, but on original PCB pins 1 and 15 are not explicitly connected to Vss (-5V in this case).
As above.Originally posted by Tepco View PostPins are internally connected inside chip itself (thru some very low resistance path), will work connected like this, but data sheet say pins 1,8,15 must be grounded externally, usually they are in most designs.
Damn. It's on my hand-drawn schematic, but got missed off when I drew the schematic. Thanks for spotting that.Originally posted by Tepco View PostAlso timing capacitor marked C24 on PCB, from pin14 U12b is missing on schematic.
If you find any other issues, please let me know.Originally posted by Tepco View PostJust another rainy day to finish this, I already retraced PCB in Protel from pictures, only for component placement, now checking connections.
I've updated the schematic with the missing cap, and added the improvements mentioned in a previous post.
Leave a comment:
-
Progress so far, relatively similar to original, just small cosmetic changes.Attached Files
Leave a comment:
-
Few issues with 4538 connection on mini PCB. Pins 8,1,15 are Vss, timing capacitor goes from pin 2 or 14 toVss, but on original PCB pins 1 and 15 are not explicitly connected to Vss (-5V in this case). Pins are internally connected inside chip itself (thru some very low resistance path), will work connected like this, but data sheet say pins 1,8,15 must be grounded externally, usually they are in most designs. Also timing capacitor marked C24 on PCB, from pin14 U12b is missing on schematic.
Just another rainy day to finish this, I already retraced PCB in Protel from pictures, only for component placement, now checking connections.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm now working on a Minipulse II version with some good results.
The transmit rate has been increased to 1000pps with a pulse width of 100us. Quiescent current consumption is 86mA.
Although I read somewhere that this detector was sampling with a 20us delay, it was actually measured as 58us. Although, with the components fitted, the sample time should have been 30us. I have made this adjustable, and managed to sample at 22us using the original coil (543uH). The MC14538BCP (U12a) has a minimum possible delay of 10us. This is achievable with the delay adjustment, as long as you have a faster coil.
A self-adjusting threshold (SAT) has been added, which is a great improvement. When you adjust the Reject control, it no longer needs to be retuned. The SAT is quite slow, so there is no loss of depth.
A small change was made to the final integrator stage that has greatly improved stability and the rejection of external noise.
The pre-amp has remained as a UA709 (I don't want to overdo things with the original PCB) but will be replaced by an NE5534 in the Mark II design.
Mk II PCB layout coming soon, together with wiring to the external controls, headphone / charger socket, etc.
Please be patient, as I'm very busy and trying to do 15 things at once.
Leave a comment:
-
Please see the Project Details for an updated schematic (V1.2).
Errors fixed in this version are:
C11 was shown as 10nF. Should have been 100nF.
R39 and C20 were connected to 0V instead of -5V.
Leave a comment:
-
This detector was designed and built in the 1980s, and there is no GB feature.Originally posted by johnandles View PostDoes the second sample initiate a sort of GB?
If not I guess this design would not like Australia's mineralised gold bearing areas?
Cheers john
The second sample is for Earth field elimination.
Leave a comment:
-
Does the second sample initiate a sort of GB?
If not I guess this design would not like Australia's mineralised gold bearing areas?
Cheers john
Leave a comment:
-
The project files are now "sticky" (so that they'll remain at the top of this thread) and all the replies have been moved to another thread.
I've also updated the schematic to Version 1.1 to include the capacitor value changes and the feedback resistor for the preamp.
Leave a comment:
-
I already mentioned reverse engineering PCB from pictures on this forum, so this is good reason to put it to the test if I get some time... Why not? People restoring oldtimers, tube radios etc, this is nice part of MD history.
Leave a comment:
-
That was my intention.Originally posted by WM6 View PostRetain DIP trough hole solution, please!
It was in my hand-drawn schematic, but it got missed out when I recreated it on the computer.Originally posted by Geo View PostQiaozhi, i can not see the feedback resistance of U2....
Well spotted.
OK, I'll do that.Originally posted by Davor View PostI am interested. If possible I'd like to see UA709 replaced with more common NE5534 and of course some NJR counterparts of it.
Just rechecked the PCB, and C6 is labelled "3.3", so I assume this is actually a 3.3pF (3p3) cap. I assume you mean C4 (as C14 is an electrolytic) which is labelled as "10", so that's a 10pF.Originally posted by Tepco View PostOn PCB picture feedback resistor is visible near LM709, capacitors C6 and C14 are 10pF, not nF.
Again, well spotted.
I will post an updated schematic in a few minutes.
If anyone else sees something wrong, please let me know. Like everyone else, I do make mistakes.
Leave a comment:
-
On PCB picture 1M feedback resistor is visible near LM709, capacitors C6 and C14 are 10pF, not nF.
Leave a comment:
-
I am interested. If possible I'd like to see UA709 replaced with more common NE5534 and of course some NJR counterparts of it.
I strongly support keeping the PCB through hole, and preferably single sided.
BTW, your schematic is missing a feedback resistor at UA709
Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: