Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Metal detector with double tone and reject discriminator- new schematic

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • sinko1
    replied
    please upload pcb. Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • peih
    replied
    Can someone help me with this scheme, PCB

    Leave a comment:


  • aft_72005
    replied
    Originally posted by ivconic View Post
    aft_72005 now i am confused? Part of schematic you are posting now is not what i am confused about!
    That oscillator is clear to me.
    The other one part of schematic i posted twice (first Sascho's and second with my wrong corrections) is what i wanted to clear up.
    Regards!

    Ivconic, ok I understand . but I believe sascho designs are correct .
    May be need some fine setting at practice .
    But strange , we cannot meet sascho here ?
    Best regards.

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    Originally posted by technos View Post
    Where did that schematic come from?

    Ivconic: 100 pF is nothing, and not meant to send signal anywhere, but rather to cancel stray capacitance from sloppy wound coil imo. It seems that Sasho has not been around for a while. You could make circuit board to go both ways to see which one works best. I think Sasho's design has been tried and works.

    Thanks Technos!

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    Originally posted by aft_72005 View Post
    ivconic ,if I remember correct, also one of the fisher detectors used similar
    Oscillator
    aft_72005 now i am confused? Part of schematic you are posting now is not what i am confused about!
    That oscillator is clear to me.
    The other one part of schematic i posted twice (first Sascho's and second with my wrong corrections) is what i wanted to clear up.
    Regards!

    Leave a comment:


  • Magma
    replied
    I'm not sure, some Russian detector.

    Leave a comment:


  • aft_72005
    replied
    ivconic ,if I remember correct, also one of the fisher detectors used similar
    Oscillator
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • aft_72005
    replied
    Originally posted by ivconic View Post
    I agree. Best way to figure it out!


    Hi ivconic
    I built this oscillator , working correct without problems .also has very good
    Stability .

    Leave a comment:


  • aft_72005
    replied
    Originally posted by Magma View Post
    A similar oscillator:

    Simulated this oscillator with proteus software . worked correct.

    Leave a comment:


  • technos
    replied
    Originally posted by Magma View Post
    A similar oscillator:
    Where did that schematic come from?

    Ivconic: 100 pF is nothing, and not meant to send signal anywhere, but rather to cancel stray capacitance from sloppy wound coil imo. It seems that Sasho has not been around for a while. You could make circuit board to go both ways to see which one works best. I think Sasho's design has been tried and works.

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    Originally posted by Pompey View Post
    You can make only Tx generator and L1 and see if it work.
    I agree. Best way to figure it out!

    Leave a comment:


  • Pompey
    replied
    Originally posted by ivconic View Post
    Yes i see. Maybe i am wrong, but i also can not figure out the first case?
    Would be best to hear from Sasho.
    Ahhh it is that awkward way to draw schematics..!
    You can make only Tx generator and L1 and see if it work.

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    Originally posted by Pompey View Post
    In this way isn`t base of tranzistor shorted to "-" ? Is this correct? Both base and emiter goes to minus . Base via L1 .
    Yes i see. Maybe i am wrong, but i also can not figure out the first case?
    Would be best to hear from Sasho.
    Ahhh it is that awkward way to draw schematics..!

    Leave a comment:


  • Magma
    replied
    A similar oscillator:
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Pompey
    replied
    In this way isn`t base of tranzistor shorted to "-" ? Is this correct? Both base and emiter goes to minus . Base via L1 .

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X