Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

TM 808 White's

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • berreizeta
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	TM808 PREAMP RX.jpg
Views:	500
Size:	446.4 KB
ID:	414519

    Click image for larger version

Name:	tm808 1.jpg
Views:	438
Size:	292.5 KB
ID:	414520

    Click image for larger version

Name:	tm808 3.jpg
Views:	453
Size:	341.9 KB
ID:	414521

    Click image for larger version

Name:	tm808 2.jpg
Views:	443
Size:	555.6 KB
ID:	414522

    Leave a comment:


  • berreizeta
    replied
    RX SIGNAL 14V :
    Click image for larger version

Name:	tm808 1.jpg
Views:	474
Size:	262.9 KB
ID:	414514

    PROBE COILS (6.533Hz) :
    Click image for larger version

Name:	tm808 2.jpg
Views:	422
Size:	514.1 KB
ID:	414515

    Leave a comment:


  • berreizeta
    replied
    Pito, join both coils at side, not at center. :
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20230829_175050_574.jpg
Views:	408
Size:	441.7 KB
ID:	414490

    Leave a comment:


  • berreizeta
    replied
    Tested with Active XTAL 25.6Khz (6.400Hz) and Pasive Xtal 420Khz (6.535Hz) both works fine !

    25.6Khz + CD4024 = 6400Hz
    420Khz + CD4040 = 6535Hz

    Little change on circuit for 420Khz (photo), original circuit s/schematic don't work for me ..

    Click image for larger version

Name:	420Khz XTAL CD4040 pcb.jpg
Views:	417
Size:	424.4 KB
ID:	414488


    Leave a comment:


  • pito
    replied
    On collector Q1 20V (on the bottom ), on Rx testing coil 0.2 V = 5 time less than in DD coils = not good.
    ​​​ Click image for larger version

Name:	thumbnail_IMG_0950.jpg
Views:	497
Size:	79.3 KB
ID:	414464 Click image for larger version

Name:	thumbnail_IMG_0952.jpg
Views:	507
Size:	83.7 KB
ID:	414465 Click image for larger version

Name:	thumbnail_IMG_0953.jpg
Views:	504
Size:	82.7 KB
ID:	414466 Click image for larger version

Name:	thumbnail_IMG_0954.jpg
Views:	510
Size:	79.2 KB
ID:	414467 ​

    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • pito
    replied
    or 26.3 kHz,
    I don't think the exact frequency is needed, the device can work between 5kHz and 8kHz

    Leave a comment:


  • pito
    replied
    To generate 6.5 kHz you can use attiny85 and this program
    HTML Code:
    #include <avr/io.h>
    
    #include <avr/interrupt.h>
    
     
    
    void comp_match() {
    
      DDRB |= (1 << PB0);  // set PB0 as output
    
      TCCR0A = 0x00;
    
      TCCR0B = 0x00;
    
      TCCR0B |= (1 << CS00);   // No prescaling
    
      TCCR0A |= (1 << WGM01);  // Toggle mode and compare match  mode
    
      OCR0A = 75;              // Compare value can be calculated as frequency = Clock / OCR0A
    
                               // A value of 75 leads to about 108,6 kHz at a clock rate of 8150000 Hz
    
      TCNT0 = 0;
    
      sei();  // Enabling global interrupt
    
      TIMSK |= (1 << OCIE0A);
    
    }
    
     
    
    ISR(TIMER0_COMPA_vect) {
    
      PORTB ^= (1 << PB0);  //Toggling port PB0
    
    }
    
     
    
    void setup() {
    
      comp_match();
    
    };
    
     
    
    void loop() {
    
    }
    
     
    
    /*
    
        
    
        The expected frequency can be calculated as freq = clock rate  / compare value
    
        In this specific case the clock rate is around 8 150 000 Hz.
    
        (See frequency 81 kHz for compare value 100)
    
        Empirical data measured 2023-08-23 with a noname ATtiny 85 board
    
        compare value    Frequency
    
                1..37 -> 217.3 kHz  
    
                   38 -> 211,5kHz  
    
                   40 -> 201 kHz
    
                   50 -> 162 kHz
    
                   60 -> 135 kHz
    
                   70 -> 116,3 kHz  
    
                   75 -> 108,6 kHz  
    
                   76 -> 107,3 kHz  
    
                   80 -> 102 kHz  
    
                  100 -> 81,8 kHz  
    
                  200 -> 41,1 kHz
    
                  255 -> 32,3 kHz
    
    */
    ​

    Leave a comment:


  • ata
    replied
    Hi berreizeta
    Have you finished making 808? And please announce the results. Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • berreizeta
    replied
    Some modifications:

    Power Supply changed 78S40 -> MC34063

    Click image for larger version  Name:	TM808 mc34063.jpg Views:	0 Size:	396.2 KB ID:	413830

    Audio Amp :

    Click image for larger version  Name:	808audio_amp.jpg Views:	0 Size:	19.7 KB ID:	413825 Click image for larger version  Name:	808audio_amp_mod.jpg Views:	0 Size:	19.5 KB ID:	413826

    Audio Amp PCB :

    Click image for larger version  Name:	TM808 tip31.png Views:	0 Size:	114.7 KB ID:	413827 Click image for larger version  Name:	TM808 tip31 mod.png Views:	0 Size:	136.9 KB ID:	413828

    Batt Meter Resistor :

    Click image for larger version  Name:	TM808 +VBatt.png Views:	0 Size:	74.6 KB ID:	413829

    Leave a comment:


  • berreizeta
    replied
    Coils dimensions are correct ?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	TM808 COIL.jpg
Views:	615
Size:	189.4 KB
ID:	413798

    Leave a comment:


  • berreizeta
    replied
    I have changed the op amp from LM386 to a NE5532 and I think it works better.

    Circuit :
    Click image for larger version  Name:	TM808 NE5532.jpg Views:	0 Size:	435.5 KB ID:	413749


    Signal at CD4024 :
    Click image for larger version  Name:	CD4024 NE5532.jpg Views:	0 Size:	399.4 KB ID:	413750


    Signal Q1 to coil (6400Hz) :
    Click image for larger version  Name:	Q1 NE5532.jpg Views:	0 Size:	348.9 KB ID:	413751

    Leave a comment:


  • Skippy
    replied
    A curious observation. Normally, I would say 15V ( +/- 7.5V ) was chosen because that is near the maximum supply voltage for CD4000 series parts, and they perform best with higher voltages - faster switching, more drive current from the output, lower ON-resistance of analogue switches ( 4053, 4066 etc ) etc. And analogue circuits are able to handle higher level signals. Plus, back when this circuit was designed, a 15V analogue supply was quite normal; op-amps for 5 V or 3.3V operation were rare, so no-one would intentionally choose a low supply voltage, unless low power consumption was a design requirement.
    The purpose of transistor Q1 is as a current source. The 4.3 V zener diode means the base voltage is fixed when it's turned on, and so the emitter is also reasonably fixed, 0.65V higher. So the 51 Ohm resistor has a steady ( 4.3 - 0.65 ) = 3.65V across it, and so passes a current of 72 mA. This should be the same for 12V or 15V supply.
    One difference is the base current drive, through the 2K7 resistor. At 15V supply, there should be (15 - 4.3 ) / 2700 = 4 mA. At 12V, this drops to 2.9 mA. This may be important.
    One experiment to try : test the circuit at 15V, with the 2k7 resistor. Then test it at 12V, but with a 2k0 resistor. These are both giving 4 mA base current. You could also try 15V and a 3k6 resistor, which gives 2.9 mA base current, and compare to 12V / 2k7 .
    I believe the sinewave voltage on the coil is 'clamped' by the conduction of the transistor collector-base diode. The clamping is affected by the 2k7 resistor, and the zener diode, which forward conducts with 0.65V drop to the +ve supply rail.

    On a different subject : I see your toroid is a bright green colour. Is this one you bought, to a particular specification, or is it a salvaged part ? It looks like a typical "common mode choke" , found on mains power supply filters in many circuits. If this is so, it may not be the best choice of ferrite material, as it is designed to absorb energy at 'high' frequencies. High may be just a few kHz, they are designed to pass 50 / 60 Hz, anything else can be filtered . They are probably not the best choice for this detector.

    Leave a comment:


  • berreizeta
    replied
    Done !
    In the collector of Q1 I have 6.4Khz
    With 15-16v the signal loses a couple of volts, maximum signal at 10-12v.
    Why are 15 volts needed and it is not powered at 12v?
    Tested with a small coil tuned close to 6400Hz *6398.4* and the Visual Analyzer program.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_20230720_170622_352.jpg Views:	0 Size:	599.1 KB ID:	413736 ​ Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_20230720_170649_950.jpg Views:	0 Size:	522.2 KB ID:	413735 Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_20230720_170655_031.jpg Views:	0 Size:	527.7 KB ID:	413734 Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_20230720_170718_264.jpg Views:	0 Size:	386.4 KB ID:	413733 Click image for larger version

Name:	tm808 6400Hz.gif
Views:	417
Size:	5.7 KB
ID:	413738
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Skippy
    replied
    Yes, see my post number 152. Your module generates a digital signal, the '4024 divider chip needs a digital signal. So you need a digital circuit, usually known as a "level shifter" to interface 3V3 ( or 5V ) signals to 15V signals. Luckily, the frequency of 26 kHz is pretty low, so that makes your level-shifter design simpler; fast switching circuits are usually more complex.
    To save me the bother of drawing circuits and uploading them ( I have major problems with this new VBulletin 5.7 ), I will link to this article:

    Figures 10, 11, 12 are the sort of schemes to use, just replace the +5V supply with the +7.5V.
    There are other alternatives. If you use the virtual 0 Volt supply, you could power the osc module from a 5V regulator fed from +7.5V and 0V. Then a high-side pnp transistor based switch will switch between +5V and -7.5V, which is good enough to feed into a 4024 powered from +7.5V and -7.5V.
    ... that one needs a drawing, I guess.
    That's why I said building your own 3.2768 MHz oscillator / divider, powered from 15V ( +7.5 and -7.5 ) would be a neater way of doing it.

    Leave a comment:


  • berreizeta
    replied
    The tests I've done with the 25.6Khz xtal lead me to add: a 78L33 (3.3v) to power the crystal

    and a LM386 to raise the crystal signal to +-10V,

    otherwise the 4024 at 16v won't work with xtal signal = 3.3 or 5V.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	TM808 XTAL 25.6Khz CUT.jpg
Views:	392
Size:	625.5 KB
ID:	413718
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X