Minelab MPS patent could be invalid

PITA???

You appear more mentally retar...er, challenged then most of these guy's.

I don't even have to open the box!

When your auto tune takes 29 seconds to complete, instead of the normal 1 minute. the thing HAS been overclocked.

Mentally retar? ha ha pmsl, no just a pain in the @rse. Yours in particular.

Go back to 4umer where you belong. This site is for the technically experienced, not the technically challenged like yourself. The reason why you don't have to open the box is... you don't know how to use a screwdriver. Now run back to 4umer and start a thread "I am a dunderhead" and stop being a nuisance here.

Regards PITA

Heres a hint Doug, was that the ONLY claim?

Since when is the same NOVEL claim not the same NOVEL claim?

Particularly when a high power "noise transmitter" is in fact what a PI is, nothing more nothing less and in fact is a better term anyway since it stops people claiming novelty on some nefariuos coding scheme since essentially it covers ALL pulse transmitters at ALL frequencies/ codes etc etc etc and thus using Pooles patent.

How are you going Aziz, I've alway liked you mate.
Don't be fooled by bullchit.
We also have a very rapid pulsing threshold.

I don't blame him for not owning up, who would try anything so stupid! ha ha

[Woody.au]

One would think that its change the topic at all cost! Why would this be so?

I think its time for me to put up another youtube video and show another fault in the GPX series detectors. I have a new policy, the more the M/L stooges come in on the attack I am going to put up a video of their poor QC..fair is fair and my video is 100% provable and factual.

Get ready for the embarrasment.

Welcome to Nazi Germany! say anything remotely lowly of the lord and master candy from minelab and the stormtroopers are called into action. Pooles patent has been taken by the mighty minelab empire, burn the records , set fire to the homes of resistance , oh such a repeated theme.

PITA???

You appear more mentally retar...er, challenged then most of these guy's.

I don't even have to open the box!

When your auto tune takes 29 seconds to complete, instead of the normal 1 minute. the thing HAS been overclocked.

I hope you read that Aziz stabalizing the heat in the damping resistors...now why would that be......I wonder <snikker>

Now its time for popcorn and coke! Very amusing discussion.

Who has the balls to post with real ID and facts?

I know you have already worked it out so why would I add anything?

PITA???

You appear more mentally retar...er, challenged then most of these guy's.

I don't even have to open the box!

When your auto tune takes 29 seconds to complete, instead of the normal 1 minute. the thing HAS been overclocked.

And BTW a feedback loop can be controlled by a GB pot on the low freq whizzo (EE term for .......) you'll work it out.

[Aziz]

Now its time for popcorn and coke! Very amusing discussion.

Who has the balls to post with real ID and facts?

The truth is it is the claims that matter, the rest is just words!

Post #21
"Signals originatng from ferrite materials may be cancelled in the low freqency path by feeding an LO frequency, the phase of which is controlled by means of a feedback loop."

Is IDENTICAL to Candys claim

Precisely rename standard EE definitions/functions/outcomes into pseudo terms and make the same claim is plaigerism of the worst kind.

[Woody.au]

It was done as an experiment, I did not carry it through into doing upgrades that make existing detectors as good as a GPX-4500.

Please get your facts 100% straight MR unregistered no ones going to know who I am cheap shot Coward!

Please have a read of my website, I just carried out a small upgrade..

Heck Woody, when are you gonna make a long range detector, like the other snake oil sales guy's???

Quoted list of mods from Ismael's site!

1. Frequency control to gain more sensitivity.
2. Speed up of processing the signals such as ground balancing and signal response
3. Finally a new set of timings that give a large increase to sensitivity and depth.



Quote from Ismael: (Number 2 was implemented by woodyfrankston and does work reasonably well. Number 1 and 2 are mods that we performed a few years back.)

OK Take note, "a few years back" ie past you d.head. As has minelab gone forward from a few years back, Im sure that the mods being done by woody have progressed too.

Any way stick to the topic. It is not about mods or modders.

Heck Woody, when are you gonna make a long range detector, like the other snake oil sales guy's???

Quoted list of mods from Ismael's site!

1. Frequency control to gain more sensitivity.
2. Speed up of processing the signals such as ground balancing and signal response
3. Finally a new set of timings that give a large increase to sensitivity and depth.



Quote from Ismael: (Number 2 was implemented by woodyfrankston and does work reasonably well. Number 1 and 2 are mods that we performed a few years back.)

Heres a hint Doug, was that the ONLY claim?