Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bipolar PI design

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • algan
    replied
    Hello colleagues, hello Carl. I built my bipolar detector, but it differs from yours; the input stage is the same, except I’m using an NE5534 IC. The output at pin 6 is fine, but with a 28cm coil, I get no response to a coin—though I do get a response to larger objects. Is it worth changing the 100k resistors, and is there an alternative input configuration possible after the two input pulses? Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • Carl-NC
    replied
    Originally posted by h9361 View Post
    I am re-designing your schematic, do you think i can replace a tl074 for Ic5 and Ic4?

    Can i replace tl064 with tl074?
    Yes and yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • h9361
    replied
    Originally posted by eduardo1979 View Post
    Hello.
    Yes, GND and -5V.
    Dear sir,
    About your Audio,
    Can i replace tl064 with tl074?
    thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • h9361
    replied
    Originally posted by Carl-NC View Post
    Yes
    Dear carl,
    I am re-designing your schematic, do you think i can replace a tl074 for Ic5 and Ic4?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	bbp.jpg
Views:	240
Size:	68.1 KB
ID:	452450

    Leave a comment:


  • Carl-NC
    replied
    Yes

    Leave a comment:


  • h9361
    replied
    Originally posted by Carl-NC View Post
    This is where pot values get converted into timing values:

    Code:
    Bool ADC_Run(void)
    {
    if(ADC_GetPot1() || ADC_GetPot2()) // If either pot has changed value
    {
    Settings.TgtDelay = ( 50 + Pot1Value) << 1; // Min = 50 (12.5us), max = 113 (28.25us)
    Settings.TxWidth = ( 50 + Pot2Value) << 3; // Min = 50us, max = 305us
    Settings.TxPeriod = (200 + (Pot2Value << 2)) << 3; // Min = 200us, max = 1220us
    return True;
    }
    return False;
    }​
    The problem is, a minimum TxPeriod of 50us (20kHz) requires reducing everything else to fit. You would first need to drop the TxWidth down to, say, 10-15us and go from there.
    Hello
    Dear Carl
    Can you tell me GB delay in code? Is it 5us?

    Leave a comment:


  • Carl-NC
    replied
    Try this:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	305
Size:	319.9 KB
ID:	450765​

    Leave a comment:


  • algan
    replied
    Hi Carl​ I want to try the TDI ground balance, but on your bipolar circuit. Can you tell me how I should connect them correctly? Thanks. Click image for larger version

Name:	888888888888888.jpg
Views:	226
Size:	103.8 KB
ID:	450747

    Leave a comment:


  • Carl-NC
    replied
    This is discussed in ITMD3 and in various threads on these forums. In a nutshell:

    Single MOSFET: fastest, simplest, single-ended pulses, requires EFE samples
    Half-bridge: slower, less simple, bipolar pulsing, no EFE samples, less balanced
    Full bridge: slowest, least simple, bipolar pulsing, no EFE samples, fully balanced

    Leave a comment:


  • Haydar
    replied


    Can someone provide a detailed explanation of the circuit effects, efficiency differences, and the pros and cons of using single MOSFET, half-bridge, and full-bridge topologies for driving coils in pulse induction systems?
    ​

    Leave a comment:


  • Carl-NC
    replied
    Originally posted by Detectorist#1 View Post
    I think, the aim of Carl with ITMDx is not to gives ready receipts for repeating. The schemes in the these books are more as educational platforms for the readers.
    Where a complete schematic is presented in ITMD3, it should be a completely working schematic (except for known errata). You are right, the circuits are primarily for teaching and therefore may be simplified and not be as high-performance as they could be. But they are good starting points.

    Leave a comment:


  • Detectorist#1
    replied
    Hi pechkata,
    Yes, I agree with you, sometimes the grapes are sour for some people...

    Leave a comment:


  • pechkata
    replied
    Originally posted by Detectorist#1 View Post
    Hi pechkata,
    I never assembled this project from ITMD3 book. I think, the aim of Carl with ITMDx is not to gives ready receipts for repeating. The schemes in the these books are more as educational platforms for the readers.
    For those who only repeats the schemes from the book, it will be more faster and cheaper to buy one ready MD for some manufacturer with good reputation.
    Hello Detectorist#1
    It has nothing to do with what you wrote.
    The schematics are completely identical to what we need.
    It just takes a little logic to put the system together.
    Carl-NC gives you an idea - not a detector.
    And don't dwell on the sour grapes.

    Leave a comment:


  • pechkata
    replied
    Originally posted by pito View Post
    I was testing this part

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	542
Size:	30.1 KB
ID:	444367​
    Hi Pito - this has nothing to do with the project in this topic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Detectorist#1
    replied
    Hi pechkata,
    I never assembled this project from ITMD3 book. I think, the aim of Carl with ITMDx is not to gives ready receipts for repeating. The schemes in the these books are more as educational platforms for the readers.
    For those who only repeats the schemes from the book, it will be more faster and cheaper to buy one ready MD for some manufacturer with good reputation.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X