Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BIPOLAR ALTERNATIVE TO H BRIDGE

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Carl-NC
    replied
    Technically it is a form of PI but requires an IB coil. It transfers the magnetic field energy onto the coil capacitance as an electric field energy, then immediately reverses the process to the opposite direction. No damping resistor is needed because there is no free-running oscillation to dampen. That is, the coil is always driven and never left open.

    The diode is just a protection device to prevent unwanted spikes (during the transitions) from zapping the preamp. If you could make a perfect IB coil then they would not be needed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Haydar
    replied


    Is this design for a PI system or an IB system? Could you explain how it works without a damping resistor? I don’t understand. Also, you clipped the signal going to the RX stage at 0.7 V using a 1N4148. What would happen if we raise this 0.7 V threshold?

    Leave a comment:


  • JoyJo
    replied
    It is interesting to be able to work on a single frequency, but so that you can also get a multi-frequency mode.

    Leave a comment:


  • moodz
    replied
    You could isolate it by two caps but do you want multi frequency?

    Leave a comment:


  • JoyJo
    replied
    Do you mean that the connection of the TX coil is the same as in a full H-bridge? And connecting the TX cactus to the device unit via a differential cable: two strands twisted together?

    Leave a comment:


  • moodz
    replied
    Originally posted by JoyJo View Post
    Can it be used without a matching transformer: only the CCPI and the TX coil?
    Yes if you are prepared to use a balanced TX coil ( ie non grounded TX ... differential drive shielded pair )

    Leave a comment:


  • JoyJo
    replied
    Can it be used without a matching transformer: only the CCPI and the TX coil?

    Leave a comment:


  • moodz
    replied
    Short answer is yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • JoyJo
    replied
    And is it possible to use the CCPI TX cascade to work with the receiving tract of the VLF? The TSCI is an alternative to the full H-bridge. The H-bridge works in VLF systems.

    Leave a comment:


  • Carl-NC
    replied
    Yes, higher efficiency since it recycles flyback energy. Also faster as it requires no damping. Also bipolar which (a) eliminates the need for EFE samples and (b) improves EMI immunity. Also CCPI which allows for much faster pulse rates. This approach requires an IB coil which potentially makes the RX circuit a little easier. See the AMX project for an example design.

    Leave a comment:


  • bishop_slayer
    replied
    I just came across this. Can anyone confirm that the main advantage of this circuit is that it has a higher efficiency than a standard pulse generator in a PI detector? Or are there additional advantages? What implications does the bipolar pulse have on the electronics in the amplification chain? Has anyone developed a proper amplification circuit for the Rx pulse for this yet?

    Leave a comment:


  • Riss
    replied
    This bridge works fine, BUT! , M3 and M4 ( #1 ) must be replaced with p-channel mosfets to enable the bridge to operate at higher supply voltages. moodz to tell how to throw away (but not exactly like )M1 and M2, because I'm uncomfortable - after all, the idea and the thread are his property

    Leave a comment:


  • moodz
    replied
    Originally posted by eclipse View Post
    Pair this with the zero point active damping and you have very nice combo right there.
    Dont tell anyone

    Leave a comment:


  • Altra
    replied
    Working Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • moodz
    replied
    ... corrected sim file.

    CCPI_REGULATED_V1 (2).zip

    moodz

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X