Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is this a major advance in PI sensitivity ??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • moodz
    replied
    ... the bifilar wound coil and front end is a project that is sitting on the shelf.

    The CCPI project overtook it.

    Leave a comment:


  • bishop_slayer
    replied
    Is this idea still worth following up on or are there newer developments that give better sensitivity?

    Leave a comment:


  • 6666
    replied
    Hi picked up a bunch of SF18G diodes from E14
    using their free code '0FREIGHT' at the checkout!

    that's a zero, put the code in "special instructions" in delivery area at checkout and free postage till end of Nov in Oz.
    $5.80 for 25

    Leave a comment:


  • Davor
    replied
    Yes, and not too high frequencies because of quite high capacitance. The only drawback is that the voltage-capacitance curve is not perfect as with the full blood varicaps, but for every VCO application that is driven by a PLL they are just perfect.
    Day by day we witness some traditional components simply vanish into obsolescence oblivion, and real varivcaps are long gone. Use what you can

    Leave a comment:


  • sido
    replied
    Is that IN4.... series a Varicap behaviour in HF Frequencies??

    Sid

    Leave a comment:


  • Davor
    replied
    Yes, 1N4001 is a varicap in disguise.

    Leave a comment:


  • mickstv
    replied
    No worries moodz. From memory I initially used some UF4005,6 which came out of an old smps. Definitely the 1n400 series are too slow for the job.

    Leave a comment:


  • moodz
    replied
    Originally posted by 6666 View Post
    Moodz would you mind telling me where you are getting the SF18G diodes ?
    thanks
    6666
    Mick is right ( thanks Mick ) ...element14 have them ... I tried 1n4004s and there is a distinct speed / recovery difference using the SFs.

    Leave a comment:


  • mickstv
    replied
    Originally posted by 6666 View Post
    Hi Mick thanks
    I had previously tried there, but must have typed it wrong
    cheers


    No worries

    Leave a comment:


  • 6666
    replied
    Hi Mick thanks
    I had previously tried there, but must have typed it wrong
    cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • mickstv
    replied
    I can help with that one Element14.




    Cheers
    Mick

    Leave a comment:


  • 6666
    replied
    Moodz would you mind telling me where you are getting the SF18G diodes ?
    thanks
    6666

    Leave a comment:


  • Davor
    replied
    THAT1510 is a nice thing when applied where it belongs, and that would be a balanced input. It works best at higher gains, and the only drawback I can think of are the "miller" capacitors that take care of the stability, but in turn also reduce gain at higher frequencies. Guess they'd be just fine for up to 100kHz bandwidth.
    It is quite possible to make such preamp on your own, and optimise it for your purposes. It comprises a CFIA amplifier that is made from two opamps and two BJTs in current feedback configuration. All the feedback components are of very low resistance, thus introducing a bare minimum of additional noise.

    The cornerstone in audio preamps was the Graeme Cohen pre, and THAT1510 is a near replica of that particular design. They both use CFIA frontend, but Cohen's pre had a cross coupled differential amp balanced output, while THAT has something else.

    It is funny, but CFIA is a nice example of mind over electronics, where an intelligent design outperforms most of the off the shelf components. Yes, our detectors are using low impedance sources, and sure they can benefit from low noise pre.

    Leave a comment:


  • moodz
    replied
    Originally posted by straton View Post
    May I ask, what are you talking about? An average/amateur PI machine would have over 10000X amplification to get descent results. The that1510 has been tested my me over 3 years ago and it has major flaws. You get a bit over average, sensitivity, but it's still far away from a good commercial PI detector.
    May I ask the same question .... I have only ever used the THAT1510 as an amplifier ... I have never thought of using it as a metal detector ...

    Since it was designed to be an amplifier I would have to agree with you that it is still far away from a good commercial PI detector

    Leave a comment:


  • straton
    replied
    Speaking of using an A/D converter, I have used the AD1671 12bit complete, 1.25MSPS, A/D converter with good results, for discrimination purposes but sensitivity went down. If anyone is interested I have a few of them for sale. They are compete/monolithic!!!, easy to use, parallel interface(easy interface), unipolar/bipolar input,with internal reference, excellent choice for this kind of job. Most atmel and microhip micros are suitable.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X