If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Let's made a PC-base metal detector with usb interface !!!
I should meantioned, that the synchronous full-wave demodulator is a lock-in amplifier to detect the RMS value of a specific frequency. It's reference frequency is coming from the oscillators. We need two of them for the dual frequency VLF.
The implemantion of it is really trivial but very efficient.
What of data we can get out of measuring / comparing RMS of those two frequencies.
Can we discriminate in such way? Need some more explanation.
Yes, we can add one simple processing stage to isolate the reactive resonse. The relation of reactive to resistive response gives good discrimination information.
Across the TX coil or across primary windings of proposed impedance transformer?
I do not like transformer in MD but this can be promising.
Hi WM6,
we have to pass some energy through the transformer. The primary coil current must be high and it's voltage low.
The secondary coil current will be low but it's voltage will be high. So the TX coil resistance can be high, which makes light weight coils possible.
Transformers are good to match the impedances.
Aziz
it's arriving an interesting stage now. The dual frequency VLF can be made with just simple electronics. You don't need any microcontroller or computer/laptop for it. So we can detect at much higher frequencies too.
We just need:
- two stable clock generators (frequency f1, f2)
- transmit driver and network
- simple front-end receiver
- two independent full-wave demodulators (measuring the RMS of the receive signal, hence full-wave rectifiers)
- ground balancing stage (summing amplifier)
- audio output stage
We don't need any phase information of the received signals. It's enough to process the RMS values (cheap and easy).
Should we break the limits with high power VLF's?
Aziz
Very interesting Aziz
What of data we can get out of measuring / comparing RMS of those two frequencies.
Can we discriminate in such way? Need some more explanation.
it's arriving an interesting stage now. The dual frequency VLF can be made with just simple electronics. You don't need any microcontroller or computer/laptop for it. So we can detect at much higher frequencies too.
We just need:
- two stable clock generators (frequency f1, f2)
- transmit driver and network
- simple front-end receiver
- two independent full-wave demodulators (measuring the RMS of the receive signal, hence full-wave rectifiers)
- ground balancing stage (summing amplifier)
- audio output stage
We don't need any phase information of the received signals. It's enough to process the RMS values (cheap and easy).
Should we break the limits with high power VLF's?
Aziz
we usually have a high impedance TX coil (longer wire, more resistance). If we remove the TX coil and put there an inductive impedance transformer, we can kick the target much stronger. At the end, the voltage across the TX coil must go high. As much as possible. This is done with a simple transformer coil. It's characteristics in conjunction with the TX coil however must be optimized. Also the current in the ferrite ring core coils should not saturate the core material.
There are much more configurations possible now. I did not find the minimal and optimal solution for it yet.
I have seen, that the frequency spectral power of the two frequencies was not right balanced. I think, the frequency spectral power of f2 was approx. 10 dB lower.
This pushes more power (energy) to the coil and kick-*** the target. The LTC1693-1 achieves a coil current of approx. +/-1.8 A. With a discrete mosfet driver, I get coil currents of up to +/-4 A (approx. 14 Watt power consumption, approx. 6 W at the TX coil, 2x3 W at the mixer coil, less than 1 W at L1). The ferrite ring cores of L1 and Mixer coil (LM) + the capacitors should also have some losses (getting warm or hot).
Keep cooling.
Aziz
thanks. Well, time will tell, whether it will work or not. I am thinking of wiring this prototype next year. With a discrete mosfet driver, the coil current goes up to +/-1.2 A and coil voltage is achieving 500 Vpp (simulation result).
I can even push more current, if I reduce the impedance of the mixer.
Indeed, this is a nice and interesting dual frequency transmitter. I wish, I would have had it much earlier.
Merry christmas and happy new year to all friends.
Cheers,
Aziz
look at this dual frequency transmitter example. It is optimized for two frequencies only and achieves better efficiency. It can produce really high voltages (>100 V), if your voltage source can deliver enough power (small power amp, low source impedance).
The two frequencies and their spectrum power content can be dimensioned by the four parts: L1, Cp, Cs and LTX (search coil). Note: L1 is a center-tapped coil wound on a ferrite ring core. All filter parts must be high-Q parts (low losses).
This type of transmitter is optimally suited for a DSP starter kit with built-in codec. You need a power amp, a receiver front-end, this filter and a sophisticated DSP software.
You can also drive it with digital clock feed (containing the two fundamental frequencies) instead of sine waves. Should give more power to the coil.
BTW, there are half a dozen other possible configurations possible. Next step is to make the power amplifier simple & efficient. And the two frequencies should be driven with pure digital clocks (makes easy interfacing to µC/DSP).
So we need a digital mixer. A simple way is doing it with two resistors. But this solution is not efficient and has power limitation.
Well, we can use complex resistors instead. Indeed, a center-tapped coil and two capacitors can be used as a good mixer.
Power amplifier? Why not using a mosfet-driver. Simple & cheap.
The main filter can be made more simple with two capacitors (Note: L1, LTX no tap). Below is a version for you to play with. Spice file included.
Cheers,
Aziz
Leave a comment: