Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

looking for home-made G.P.R.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Valchev
    replied
    Home made cheap Ground penetrating radar

    Good pdf.
    The pulse generator from p520580.pdf is suitable only for a UWB radar(in air).
    If you wish GPR to work on not completely flat ground surface, must to use pulse generator from hundreds volts to kilo-volt.
    If I do not make mistake Figure 14 is not the right schematic to use a RF mixer as a sampler.
    You can make good cheap Ground penetrating radar with cheap elements, without DSP and MC100EP196, but you will have more difficultys to design and adjust.
    To design a GPR most expensive is the time. If you have not the big team of professional engineers you will need years.

    Leave a comment:


  • romtech
    replied
    The best article on building a GPR unit:


    This really details some of the problems.
    I don't see how I could build one cheaply.

    Comments please.

    Leave a comment:


  • Valchev
    replied
    Excuse Me, I have no interest.
    I do not offer or sale schematics.

    Leave a comment:


  • schatzsucher
    replied
    do you have to exchange interest more gradiometer for gpr?

    Leave a comment:


  • Valchev
    replied
    GPR depth according to EuroGPR trade association:
    http://www.eurogpr.org/factsheet.htm#

    click on
    No1 Introduction to GPR
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Valchev
    replied
    Link

    Link



    Detection of Buried Agricultural Drainage Pipe
    Using Conventional Geophysical Methods



    B. J. Allred, N. R. Fausey, L. Peters, Jr., C. Chen, J. J. Daniels, H. Youn




    ........ As an overall goal, this investigation focused on extensive testing of four conventional geophysical methods, geomagnetic surveying, electromagnetic induction, resistivity, and ground penetrating radar, to determine which was most efficient and effective in detecting buried agricultural drainage pipe...........




    .......... Ground penetrating radar (GPR) was the only geophysical method of the four tested during this phase of research that had success in detecting buried drainage pipe.............

    Leave a comment:


  • Valchev
    replied
    Test

    GPR - EXPERIMENTAL TEST RESULT
    Cave ( width 0.4meters, length 0.8m, height 0.25m ) in a dry soil on the depth 0.5m , covered with a plastic flatness 0.9m x 0.5m x 5mm - non conductor , (tested that GPR can not detect the flatness in air, can not detect difference between air and flatness)
    antenna - 300 MHz
    time window - 50 nS
    1. Plan of cave
    2. Photo
    3. Radargram
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Unregistered
    Guest replied
    petar valchev,

    to my recollection, i was the one who started this topic...looking for home-made gpr....because the gprs, the commercial gprs are too expensive.....very glad that u made one......

    Peace!

    gen

    Leave a comment:


  • Unregistered
    Guest replied
    thanks....
    your two email worked...i sent u...email....

    gen

    Leave a comment:


  • Valchev
    replied
    Hi,
    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    ( [email protected] )

    Leave a comment:


  • Unregistered
    Guest replied
    petar valchev,

    your email address seems not working...do you have any other contact address?

    gen

    Leave a comment:


  • Dirk
    replied
    Sample

    Hi

    That is what I think that it is.

    Best regards

    Leave a comment:


  • Valchev
    replied
    It is stroboscopic metod. Example is with 10 pulses to be simple, realy it is many many more. It is no my idea, it is а classical metod. And output pulses form is ideal. Conversion time of PIC is < 0.020mS, Out puls is 55ms.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Dirk
    replied
    sampler

    Hi

    My english is not good too. So I attach two files.
    I think you use a samling strategy like (b) not like (a).
    In case (a) you would need a ADC with giga samples
    per second (Gsps) in case (b) only kilo samples (ksps).
    (c) i think schows the function of of the Sampler, so
    In your block diagram the graph shows not the true
    behavior at the output of the sampler. The signal is
    not spreaded analog (continuously in time and value)
    from 60ns to 55ms.

    Best regards
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Valchev
    replied
    Excuze me, as you can see I speak English with
    difficulty, and I am not sure if i understand and
    explain correctly. For that i prefer to drаw:

    Switch must to can to be closed only for 100pS=0.1nS
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X