Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PPM MarkIV project progress report

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ApBerg
    replied
    Originally posted by KonstantinT View Post
    In the file main.c change 210 -211 lines from

    if (diff > 5.0) for (k = i; k < CYCLE_COUNT; k++) arctangents[j][k] -= TWO_PI;
    if (diff < - 5.0) for (k = i; k < CYCLE_COUNT; k++) arctangents[j][k] += TWO_PI;

    to

    if (diff > PI) for (k = i; k < CYCLE_COUNT; k++) arctangents[j][k] -= TWO_PI;
    if (diff < - PI) for (k = i; k < CYCLE_COUNT; k++) arctangents[j][k] += TWO_PI;

    It is best to explore this algorithm in Matlab. The resulting accuracy is much lower Cramer-Rao Lower Bound.

    Hello Konstantin.

    Is it the main.c file that is with the Koehler project in CircuitCeller May 2007 ?
    Have you made that project ?
    Last month I bought the CC backup CD from 2007 and have read about that project..
    Nice info.. as al the info from Jim Koehler is, also the info (and project) from Willy Bayot is great.

    But with all that info I cannot yet get a proton mag running...to bay a mag from Willy ( I sure like that ) is for me not an option... no budget (wife kills me ....yes she told me..)

    I sure would like a diy project that is on a lower budget...with a Microchip that knows what to do..

    Best regards

    Ap

    Leave a comment:


  • KonstantinT
    replied
    Originally posted by ApBerg View Post
    Hello Konstantin.

    Like to see the info you have....

    Best regards.

    Ap
    In the file main.c change 210 -211 lines from

    if (diff > 5.0) for (k = i; k < CYCLE_COUNT; k++) arctangents[j][k] -= TWO_PI;
    if (diff < - 5.0) for (k = i; k < CYCLE_COUNT; k++) arctangents[j][k] += TWO_PI;

    to

    if (diff > PI) for (k = i; k < CYCLE_COUNT; k++) arctangents[j][k] -= TWO_PI;
    if (diff < - PI) for (k = i; k < CYCLE_COUNT; k++) arctangents[j][k] += TWO_PI;

    It is best to explore this algorithm in Matlab. The resulting accuracy is much lower Cramer-Rao Lower Bound.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • ApBerg
    replied
    Originally posted by KonstantinT View Post
    Hi,

    I looked your's file in an audio editor. I have a few questions for you.

    1.This file was created by copying the same pieces of the signal. Is this true?
    2.The signal is passed through a narrow-band bandpass filter. Real precession signals look a bit wrong.
    3.Could you show the original file? I want to estimate the ratio of signal to noise without the use of narrow-band filter. My preliminary estimate is about 30 dB.
    4.What is the relative and absolute accuracy? What is the value of the gradient resistance you got?

    As far as I've heard you use the Jim Koehler's algorithm.
    I researched this algorithm. I got about 1,3 nT accuracy on test signals with a signal-noise ratio 40 dB and the sampling time 0.5 seconds. His algorithm is much inferior to other algorithms. Maybe you have changed it somehow?

    The published source code of this algorithm has a mistake. I can publish a corrected version to all who wish to explore it.

    BR
    Konstantin.


    Hello Konstantin.

    Like to see the info you have....

    Best regards.

    Ap

    Leave a comment:


  • KonstantinT
    replied
    Originally posted by Willy Bayot View Post
    Hi,

    This is the sound of the proton precession from our PPM.
    It is an exponentially-decaying signal of frequency of 2050Hz corresponding to the earth magnetic field in my region.

    Willy
    Hi,

    I looked your's file in an audio editor. I have a few questions for you.

    1.This file was created by copying the same pieces of the signal. Is this true?
    2.The signal is passed through a narrow-band bandpass filter. Real precession signals look a bit wrong.
    3.Could you show the original file? I want to estimate the ratio of signal to noise without the use of narrow-band filter. My preliminary estimate is about 30 dB.
    4.What is the relative and absolute accuracy? What is the value of the gradient resistance you got?

    As far as I've heard you use the Jim Koehler's algorithm.
    I researched this algorithm. I got about 1,3 nT accuracy on test signals with a signal-noise ratio 40 dB and the sampling time 0.5 seconds. His algorithm is much inferior to other algorithms. Maybe you have changed it somehow?

    The published source code of this algorithm has a mistake. I can publish a corrected version to all who wish to explore it.

    BR
    Konstantin.

    Leave a comment:


  • Beausmobil
    replied
    Used equipment?

    Hi Willy, your project sounds like it's on point. I am looking for underwater equipment and as always don't have a ton of money. What do you have for sale ( tow fish )...
    Thanks Beau

    Leave a comment:


  • syed ayub basha
    replied
    Sir I want to buy.

    Sir Now i want to buy your product. first i have some thing to talk about the product.
    1) what is the max. depth it will detect the item as per object size. you have any table to explain this question.
    2) if under ground any other metal means non ferrous. it will detect or not. because my magnetic locator showing non ferrous items also. i don't know how it is showing?
    3) in sub surface any cavity is presence. can this meter detect that cavity?
    4) I am from India. how can you send this full equipment with assemble, with out battery.
    5)please send your price and other details to my ID

    [email protected]

    Leave a comment:


  • Willy Bayot
    replied
    Originally posted by carthage View Post
    Hi Willy; happy New Year to you and to all the Geotech form participants.

    Willy is it possible to add pictures to see the new PPM?
    This is few PIX of two markIVB systems built for underwater surveys. The first one has an LCD+keypad to be able to make underground as well as underwater surveys and the second one is a 'blind' configuration. Both have a USB connection to an operator interface on a PC.
    You can see the two boxes closed, one box opened and two pix with the details of each board.
    Inside the box with its transparent cover, you can see the GPS module at the upper left of the picture.

    The last picture is a screen dump of the PC program while reviewing one GPS-based grid file.

    Willy
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Willy Bayot
    replied
    Originally posted by carthage View Post
    Hi Willy; happy New Year to you and to all the Geotech form participants.

    Willy is it possible to add pictures to see the new PPM?
    Hi,

    All the upgrades applied from the MarkIV to the MarkIVB series are internal to the control box.
    There are upgraded boards to support the programmable tuning and the still improved SNR and there are the corresponding upgrades of the software application.
    Thus, the look of the control box in the two main configuration options (LCD or GUI options) is the same as for the MarkIV systems.
    The home page of our web site has been updated with the new price list and package descriptions:
    http://users.skynet.be/fa352591/index.htm

    Willy

    Leave a comment:


  • carthage
    replied
    Pictures

    Hi Willy; happy New Year to you and to all the Geotech form participants.

    Willy is it possible to add pictures to see the new PPM?

    Leave a comment:


  • Willy Bayot
    replied
    MarkIVB production is out.

    Hi all,

    We have received from production the new batch of boards designed for the MarkIVB systems.
    All these boards have been tested one at a time in Canada and will come in Belgium within a week.
    The updated price structure document is available there: http://users.skynet.be/fa352591/Mark...012_prices.pdf

    Willy

    Leave a comment:


  • Willy Bayot
    replied
    Hi all,

    We have now exhausted all our stock of MarkIV boards, we have sold them all.
    Thus, we prepare a new MarkIVB series with upgraded specs to be available before the end of this year. Depending on our costs of production which could be higher, we'll probably have to slightly revise our price structure. Thus, I'll publish a precise pricing when the new units will be available but the pricing already published is a good approximation of what it will be.

    The new units will have programmable tuning (no more DIP Switch) and the option of a Windows-based control program (connected to the PPM through an USB link) to set the system parameters and review previously captured survey grid files without removing/inserting the SD Card. Actually, these two upgrades together will completely avoid opening the cover of the NEMA box.
    This link will be available both for the basic LCD version and the GUI version.

    The same control program will also be used for real-time control of the PPM during underwater surveys based on GPS fixes. It will plot the PPM data and the GPS fixes on the PC Screen. This configuration does not require any other operator interface (can run on a blind box) but it is also available on the normal LCD or GUI versions.
    I have attached a screen dump of the program in operation in relation to a PPM MarkIVB equipped with the GPS Option.

    Willy
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Willy Bayot
    replied
    Hi,

    This is the sound of the proton precession from our PPM.
    It is an exponentially-decaying signal of frequency of 2050Hz corresponding to the earth magnetic field in my region.

    Willy
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Leon...
    replied
    Dear Alexis, the results they is precisely the himself, simply the box it changes.
    See Photos.

    Leave a comment:


  • Willy Bayot
    replied
    Originally posted by Alexismex View Post
    Hello Willy ,
    See the videos, it is a great product thank you for your effort and tenacity to give us a very pro magnetometer....what is the price of the Mark IV like we see in the Leon video?
    Thank you
    Alexis.
    Hi Alexis,

    The nice looking packaging you see on the video has been built by Leonidas from a MkIV KIT (just the set of electronic boards) he bought from us.

    Our own packaging is different but the functionalities of the final system are exactly the same.
    The basic version of MkIV unit packaged in its watertight NEMA box with LCD and keyboard costs 1995 Euro and the smart GUI module option with touch screen replacing the LCD and keyboard costs 400 Euro.

    Willy

    Leave a comment:


  • Alexismex
    replied
    Hello Willy ,
    See the videos, it is a great product thank you for your effort and tenacity to give us a very pro magnetometer....what is the price of the Mark IV like we see in the Leon video?
    Thank you
    Alexis.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X