Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Delta Pulse

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • chuubaba
    replied
    Thank you TufaN and Tifred for your attention to the board.
    C1is soldered on copper side ( back side of the board)

    Leave a comment:


  • tifred
    replied
    HI CHUUBABA....YOUR C1 CAPACITOR IS MISSING!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	C1....JPG
Views:	1
Size:	125.3 KB
ID:	355911

    Leave a comment:


  • TufaN
    replied
    very bad assembly. lousy soldering. workmanship zero.

    Leave a comment:


  • Andi68
    replied
    Unless he lives in a wooden hut

    Leave a comment:


  • kt315
    replied
    Originally posted by Jose View Post
    It is likely to be false or damaged due to improper installation of VD4.
    i wrote many times do not use 1m coil in the room. he did ignore off all my suggestions.
    deplorable consequences. he does not hear nothing. he wants go just his way despite on all warnings.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vadim18
    replied
    Originally posted by kt315 View Post
    you can do Delay2 to maximum and get more depth on test.

    Thank for advise kt315!
    I will try that option in field tests.
    For me i discovered that Delay2 can also make some emi supression (i think for 50Hz+harmonics), but only if proper adjusted and stay at proper point/point's of scale.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jose
    replied
    Originally posted by chuubaba View Post
    I have corrected VD4. Nothing has improved after correcting this mistake. The 356 chip is still not working
    It is likely to be false or damaged due to improper installation of VD4.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jose
    replied
    Buy two LF357 and two TL081 to perform the tests.
    Install a socket to test the chips.
    With the LF357, set the Delay to 22 us.
    The TL081 turned out to be false.
    Recover a TL081 from another board and it worked, the delay was set to 70 us so that the DP was quiet.
    I also tested an LF356 and the delay was set to 35 us.
    All other controls and damping resistance were not altered during the tests.
    Other Chips, 5534; LM318; 709; they didn't work.
    LF357 is preferred, followed by LF356, but with TL081 sensitivity to small and medium objects is lost.
    Attached do images taken with the oscilloscope, at the exit (leg 6) of the LF357 and TL081.Click image for larger version

Name:	DP LF357.JPG
Views:	2
Size:	14.3 KB
ID:	355836Click image for larger version

Name:	DP TL081.JPG
Views:	2
Size:	12.5 KB
ID:	355837

    Leave a comment:


  • chuubaba
    replied
    I have corrected VD4. Nothing has improved after correcting this mistake. The 356 chip is still not working

    Leave a comment:


  • chuubaba
    replied
    Originally posted by Andi68 View Post
    No, a good solder joint must also look good.
    And look at post #3634 of kt
    Yes i see the mistake there with VD4. I don't want to solder again and again so i ignore beautification. The solder joints are good because i checked with DMM.

    Leave a comment:


  • kt315
    replied
    Originally posted by Andi68 View Post
    No, a good solder joint must also look good.
    And look at post #3634 of kt
    unattentionable

    Leave a comment:


  • kt315
    replied
    you can do Delay2 to maximum and get more depth on test.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vadim18
    replied
    Originally posted by 6666 View Post
    Why are you not happy with 60cm ?, those 357 are hard to get.
    Hi 6666!
    I'm was happy with that first test results. Now my limit is 90cm to aluminium cola can with clear signal.
    My setup: L475 uH, D27cm, R 2 Ohm, Rdamp 414Ohm. Delay1 and Delay2 at minimum, TX 100uS, PPS 300. Gain near x1500.


    I have no problem with LF but... i stil use old BC548 transistors, ceramic caps in offset correctors and maybe fake Wima 100nf MKP capacitor - magnet can easy stick to it. Also my problem is laziness...

    some fake ic on photo Click image for larger version

Name:	fake and original.png
Views:	1
Size:	979.8 KB
ID:	355829

    Leave a comment:


  • Andi68
    replied
    No, a good solder joint must also look good.
    And look at post #3634 of kt

    Leave a comment:


  • chuubaba
    replied
    Originally posted by Andi68 View Post
    And I see some nasty solder joints
    Yes very ugly but working good.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X