Practical tested

[Detectorist#1]

Hi sascho,
The first using of your idea (or maybe independent of you) for reading of RX signals during TX-ON time of PI detector is mentioned from Tinkerer from his post from 04 May 2009.
The Voodoo hybrid project not use reading of RX signals during TX-ON time as I know. It is a real hybrid detector because using of pulse and sinus signals analysis.

[scs-bg]

The one who invented the wheel is not angry that others used it... What matters is the result in the end.

[Qiaozhi]

All projects on this forum related to discrimination start from the idea in this old scheme of mine. This is a long time before project Voodoo.2011.

Voodoo is fundamentally different to your design. For a start, it has two preamps. One connected to the TX coil, and the other to the RX coil.
From the schematic of the Mini, I can see that it only samples the RX coil.

[Qiaozhi]

Hi sascho,
The first using of your idea (or maybe independent of you) for reading of RX signals during TX-ON time of PI detector is mentioned from Tinkerer from his post from 04 May 2009.
The Voodoo hybrid project not use reading of RX signals during TX-ON time as I know. It is a real hybrid detector because using of pulse and sinus signals analysis.

Correct.

[scs-bg]

The use of pi detectors is harmful to health. The electromagnetic field is of high intensity. The consequences are circulatory disorders, headaches and provoking oncology. So it is better to make inductive balance detectors. "Mini" is schematic only discrimination channel.

[nejdet]

Is there any chance we can see a real video?

[Qiaozhi]

The use of pi detectors is harmful to health. The electromagnetic field is of high intensity. The consequences are circulatory disorders, headaches and provoking oncology. So it is better to make inductive balance detectors. "Mini" is schematic only discrimination channel.

The above is false information.

Pulse induction detectors operate at low power and emit non-ionizing radiation. They do not emit enough energy to break DNA or cause cellular damage. The EMF levels are comparable to or lower than those from common household devices like cell phones or Wi-Fi routers.

Studies on low-frequency EMF exposure (from devices like metal detectors) have not shown consistent evidence of adverse health effects at the levels typically encountered. Regulatory bodies like the World Health Organization (WHO) and ICNIRP have found no significant health risks from such low-level exposures.

The only potential hazards associated with metal detecting are such things as sunburn, dehydration, or physical strain from prolonged use.

[Carl-NC]

Stop the bickering. People are free to share or not share as they like.