Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Magnum on steroids!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Artyom
    replied
    Originally posted by ivconic View Post
    UP!

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    Originally posted by ivconic View Post
    Yes i made few devices so far. Right at this moment i am in a middle of making another one.
    I went outdoor several times with the device. It is performing alright.
    It is tough for me to judge and be objective, ever since i got the Deus; every other I/B detector looks pretty funny to me.
    But i would say that this is quite decent detector.
    If you put GEB command on front panel; you will be able to adjust it quite right on hotrocks and minerals.
    It is the Disc which can be improved a bit, GEB is working just fine.
    Depths are relative... as at any other model. Depths are depending on type of soil, moisture, outer weather conditions etc.
    The very same story as with any other model in that range. Decent. Correct. Usable.
    2-tone feature is advantage. Works pretty nice.

    UP!

    Leave a comment:


  • scs
    replied
    This detector is checked in real search?

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    Originally posted by CDI View Post
    If im right, shield is connected after feedback turn on TX...
    No it is the opposite, shield is connected at start of TX windings.
    Though i would like also to experiment with shield connected to start at RX too, maybe later.
    It is not exact "feedback" turn.
    It is just extension turn on TX, 1 turn (on present coil size) continuing after the ending turn of TX.

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    Originally posted by Artyom View Post
    You showed factory sensor connection with 5-pin connector. If the sensor to make and use the connector on the 4th contact, whether a connection is possible by connecting the collector Q7 and C37?
    Yes, correct!

    Leave a comment:


  • CDI
    replied
    If im right, shield is connected after feedback turn on TX...

    Leave a comment:


  • Artyom
    replied
    You showed factory sensor connection with 5-pin connector. If the sensor to make and use the connector on the 4th contact, whether a connection is possible by connecting the collector Q7 and C37?

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	bnh.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	262.1 KB
ID:	347061
    Click image for larger version

Name:	bnh2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	197.0 KB
ID:	347062
    Click image for larger version

Name:	clo.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	28.1 KB
ID:	347063

    Leave a comment:


  • Artyom
    replied


    why not connected to this contact. draw your wiring diagram which connect the shielding of the sensor?

    Leave a comment:


  • SVEN1
    replied
    I just rec'd my search coil 9" Golden Mask https://thrace-detectors.com/product...olil-23cm.html
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    Originally posted by Artyom View Post
    Tell me, what kind of probe are you using? The size, number of turns and wire diameter?

    It is the same coil as on video i posted earlier on this topic.
    I tried to make closest copy of original Golden Mask coil:



    TX= ~0.7mH, 2.9 ohms + one more turn for 5th pin on connector, wire 0.45mm
    RX= ~6mH, 24.5 ohms, wire 0.25mm

    Don't exactly remember number of turns, usually i make more turns and than by measuring inductance i lower the number of turns until i get closest to desired inductance.
    That's why i never try to remember exact number of turns.

    ...
    I guess the closest you can get is to see this my Corel file.
    I scanned part of original coil (since my scanner is A4) best as it could fit, to get as closest to original dimensions and shape.

    I am using Corel 9 for long period, kinda used much on it. So you'll have to have Corel 9 to be able to open this file.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Artyom
    replied
    Originally posted by ivconic View Post
    Yes i made few devices so far. Right at this moment i am in a middle of making another one.
    I went outdoor several times with the device. It is performing alright.
    It is tough for me to judge and be objective, ever since i got the Deus; every other I/B detector looks pretty funny to me.
    But i would say that this is quite decent detector.
    If you put GEB command on front panel; you will be able to adjust it quite right on hotrocks and minerals.
    It is the Disc which can be improved a bit, GEB is working just fine.
    Depths are relative... as at any other model. Depths are depending on type of soil, moisture, outer weather conditions etc.
    The very same story as with any other model in that range. Decent. Correct. Usable.
    2-tone feature is advantage. Works pretty nice.

    Tell me, what kind of probe are you using? The size, number of turns and wire diameter?

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    Originally posted by Artyom View Post
    Hi, Ivconic. have you had the device work in the ground? how to behave, what depth, what kind of reaction on the hot stones, etc. Thank you.
    Yes i made few devices so far. Right at this moment i am in a middle of making another one.
    I went outdoor several times with the device. It is performing alright.
    It is tough for me to judge and be objective, ever since i got the Deus; every other I/B detector looks pretty funny to me.
    But i would say that this is quite decent detector.
    If you put GEB command on front panel; you will be able to adjust it quite right on hotrocks and minerals.
    It is the Disc which can be improved a bit, GEB is working just fine.
    Depths are relative... as at any other model. Depths are depending on type of soil, moisture, outer weather conditions etc.
    The very same story as with any other model in that range. Decent. Correct. Usable.
    2-tone feature is advantage. Works pretty nice.

    Leave a comment:


  • Artyom
    replied
    Hi, Ivconic. have you had the device work in the ground? how to behave, what depth, what kind of reaction on the hot stones, etc. Thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • CDI
    replied
    Originally posted by SVEN1 View Post
    If your lucky enough to have a 3-D printer you could make one.
    I will probably end up up making one using epoxy and fiberglass cloth. Like I did once before.
    Think I have something around here I can use as a mold.
    [ATTACH]37757[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH]37758[/ATTACH]
    Interesting, same thing i tried with car bumper's, but in my case it was polyester resin, not epoxy.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X