Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Surf PI Micro Var. 1.00

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BKY1337
    replied
    Eddy made this schematic. But not this layout.

    It doesnt matter anyways, the only difference is this one transistor.

    Leave a comment:


  • kt315
    replied
    Eddy is here in forum and you can ask him anytime.

    Leave a comment:


  • BKY1337
    replied
    If it works like the normal Surf PI then its ok for me.

    I think i can use any transistor type for the speaker. I will order a few more.

    Leave a comment:


  • kt315
    replied
    all this plan of Eddy to do this moded Surf is 'caps do not give sure accuracy of the timing'. while we need color LCD. we need discrimination
    and advanced project. we need two polar pulses with 128 points of samples. but Eddy just changes 4093 on the micro.

    Leave a comment:


  • BKY1337
    replied
    This schematic doesn't match to the board exactly.
    The transistor is at the board but not in the schematic.
    I think the guy who made it added it afterwards.

    Leave a comment:


  • pustareka
    replied
    Кто сильнее Surf PI Micro Var. 1.00 или CLONE PI-W ?
    General tech discussions on all types of metal detectors: VLF, 2-box, BFO, off-resonance, PLL, etc. Questions, ideas, and anything else that moves you.


    Who best Surf PI Micro Var. 1.00 or CLONE PI-W ?

    Leave a comment:


  • kt315
    replied
    i mean this sch. which do you mean? http://smartelectronix.biz/_pu/0/48791391.jpg
    i do not see a transistor on pin 10.

    Leave a comment:


  • BKY1337
    replied
    Theres a transistor at pin10 and the speaker after that.
    A resistor replaces the volume pot.

    Leave a comment:


  • kt315
    replied
    Because the only difference is a speaker instead of a Motor.
    ---

    PIC pin 10 goes to EP1. i think EP is E lectric P iezo.

    Leave a comment:


  • kt315
    replied
    Originally posted by BKY1337 View Post
    The BC517 is a darlington too. KT said i should change 8 to 5.
    I should better read the datasheets of the transistors.
    use ordinary transistors. i do not see big necessity to use darlington in this schematic.

    Leave a comment:


  • BKY1337
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	SURFPIMICRO.png
Views:	1
Size:	143.1 KB
ID:	352396

    The schematic doesnt use a speaker and i dont know which transistor i should use for it.
    It's the last one without designation. Maye the same like T1? Because the only difference is a speaker instead of a Motor.


    I hope the electrolytic caps are okay, the sizes are confusing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Andi68
    replied
    I wanted to say that I check every statement and do not rely on it.
    And I do not see kt as a problem, never

    Leave a comment:


  • kt315
    replied
    Originally posted by BKY1337 View Post
    The BC517 is a darlington too. KT said i should change 8 to 5.
    I should better read the datasheets of the transistors.
    a problem is not with kt, problem with whom drawed this schematic. open any my one and you will see CLEAR STRUCTURE OF EVERY TRANSISTOR.
    for mosfet i MARK EVERY PIN - GATE SOURCE DRAIN. no misleading!

    Leave a comment:


  • Andi68
    replied
    Must not vote for everything that kt says

    Leave a comment:


  • BKY1337
    replied
    The BC517 is a darlington too. KT said i should change 8 to 5.
    I should better read the datasheets of the transistors.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X