Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Get FCC Approved!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Unregistered
    I think that the name "paul" is much the same as Bruce Candy, or one of his stooges. Something tells me that the Minelab sales may have dropped off due to other detectors starting to give the GP platform a run for its money.

    Paul sounds like the voice of a very business orientated minelab.
    Bruce Candy would not be so stupid!
    ElectroNovice

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Carl-NC
      Paul, I'm very familiar with the FCC regs but I can see, based on your replies in this and other threads, that you are never ever ever wrong, no matter how mistaken you might be. Therefore, I will follow the lead of Reg, Eric, and Dave, and cease wasting my time.

      Your behaviour on this forum is a curious contrast to that on other forums. When you asked for assistance with your PI design here and here, your conduct was superb. In discussions about your "free energy" concept here, you implored others to "keep the discussion civilized".

      Yet on this forum, anyone who disagrees with you, simply doesn't know what the hell they are talking about.

      I suspect you could have some useful knowledge to share, but at this point, I doubt anyone would care to listen. You also could have tapped the expertise of various forum denizens to assist in developing your ideas on PI design but, now, surely no one would want to help. I strongly suspect that you will not find whatever it is you are looking for on these forums.

      - Carl
      Thanks Carl for expressing the sentiments of many on this forum. Hopefully when Paul leaves the forum those members that have so much to contribute will start posting again.
      ElectroNovice

      Comment


      • #18
        My favorite subject......RF

        Oh yes a coil stuck up in the air makes like an antenna.....true

        Now what happens when we encase the wire structure with a Faraday sheild?

        Now what happens when we angle our coil flat near the ground?

        If Paul got off his desk chair and did some real World measurements he would find that the harmonic content dies at 5 times the fundamental pulse rate.
        The coil in itself is a low pass filter and this snuffs out higher order products.
        The Faraday sheild on most coils is a complete wrap around (except Minelab) that impedes higher frequencies leaving the structure. You would be hard pushed to detect anything above 10Khz at even a meter from the coil.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by woody
          My favorite subject......RF

          Oh yes a coil stuck up in the air makes like an antenna.....true

          Now what happens when we encase the wire structure with a Faraday sheild?

          Now what happens when we angle our coil flat near the ground?

          If Paul got off his desk chair and did some real World measurements he would find that the harmonic content dies at 5 times the fundamental pulse rate.
          The coil in itself is a low pass filter and this snuffs out higher order products.
          The Faraday sheild on most coils is a complete wrap around (except Minelab) that impedes higher frequencies leaving the structure. You would be hard pushed to detect anything above 10Khz at even a meter from the coil.
          Thanks Woody,but be careful you will be the next one to be attacked by Paul.who we know has no "peer" in the world of Rf,EM.physics ,Pi or his own self importance! LOL LOL
          ElectroNovice

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Carl-NC
            Paul, I'm very familiar with the FCC regs but I can see, based on your replies in this and other threads, that you are never ever ever wrong, no matter how mistaken you might be.
            You can't back up your claims? Twice I asked you to point out in the FCC document to back up your claim and you come back with a statement / claim without a shred of evidence.

            I won't even reply to your other nonsense.

            Paul

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by woody
              If Paul got off his desk chair and did some real World measurements he would find that the harmonic content dies at 5 times the fundamental pulse rate.
              You will note that I used key words such as "good PI's." How do you propose to sample 1 usec after Tx if your coil dies out at the 5th harmonic?


              Originally posted by woody
              The coil in itself is a low pass filter and this snuffs out higher order products.
              Who told you that? If you have too many windings or the windings are too close then you'll have problems. Again, key word is "good PI's."


              Originally posted by woody
              The Faraday sheild on most coils is a complete wrap around (except Minelab) that impedes higher frequencies leaving the structure. You would be hard pushed to detect anything above 10Khz at even a meter from the coil.
              Key word, "good PI's." Perhaps that's one reason Minelab is still the best.


              Paul

              Comment


              • #22
                Paul, you do not know what you are talking about. You just seem to post crap with intertwined technical jargon that makes no sense to anybody with an electronics background. Maybe you want to sound like a know it all but you cannot even grasp the fundamentals. I have been through some of your statements in other posts and they really are retarded.

                Either you are a **** stirrer or a Techo wannabe.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Woody
                  Paul, you do not know what you are talking about. You just seem to post crap with intertwined technical jargon that makes no sense to anybody with an electronics background. Maybe you want to sound like a know it all but you cannot even grasp the fundamentals. I have been through some of your statements in other posts and they really are retarded.

                  Either you are a **** stirrer or a Techo wannabe.
                  Care to have a civilized conversation? Please show me one error. Come on big guy. I challenge you.

                  Paul

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    And if or when you attempt to find one scientific error that I posted, please be specific and broad.

                    Paul

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I will not waste my time in debating the self proclaimed Guru of know it all.

                      May all your electrons spin counter clockwise.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Paul
                        You will note that I used key words such as "good PI's." How do you propose to sample 1 usec after Tx if your coil dies out at the 5th harmonic?


                        Who told you that? If you have too many windings or the windings are too close then you'll have problems. Again, key word is "good PI's."


                        Key word, "good PI's." Perhaps that's one reason Minelab is still the best.


                        Paul
                        Minelab don't even shield their coils properly!And despite ML's claims their has been NO improvement in depth capability on larger nuggets since the SD 2000 in 1995! In fact an SD 2100 run in ch1 with a mono will blow a GP3500 out of the water for depth on big nuggets! I think Paul or is it Bruce? should come clean and tell consumers why this is so.
                        ElectroNovice

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Paul Lowrance

                          Originally posted by paul
                          And if or when you attempt to find one scientific error that I posted, please be specific and broad.
                          Try this ->
                          http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:PaulL

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by ElectroNovice
                            Minelab don't even shield their coils properly!And despite ML's claims their has been NO improvement in depth capability on larger nuggets since the SD 2000 in 1995! In fact an SD 2100 run in ch1 with a mono will blow a GP3500 out of the water for depth on big nuggets! I think Paul or is it Bruce? should come clean and tell consumers why this is so.
                            ElectroNovice
                            What do you have against Minelab? If they can get away with selling a GP3500 for about $3500 then don't you think that means something?

                            Paul

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Qiaozhi
                              Ha Ha. You think your funny. So please show the errors. I'm still waiting, LOL.

                              Can't you people see the difference. I post details. You post claims. Oh well.

                              Paul

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Paul
                                Care to have a civilized conversation? Please show me one error. Come on big guy. I challenge you.

                                Paul
                                Members should go to this web site:http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...f6e4c584d5b180

                                Then you will see what Paul is really up to,make up your own mind then if he has any credibility.Then ask why his theory and "experiments" have never been apparently published in a state of the art,peer reviewed scientific journal.Ask him why if his theory and "experiments" are credible why does he not have a large research team at his disposal at a university and very substantive long term research grants from governments or more particularly the private sector?
                                ElectroNovice

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X