Originally posted by Detectorist#1
View Post
So the question is "why did they use these low noise frontends ?" ... (and I was not in the lab looking over the designers shoulder when they made these decisions ) but I will put my money on "mixer leakage" and where they have used a simple "chopper" style demodulator which most designs use ... the presence of low frequency noise ( ie down to DC ) which is within the target demodulated BW at the input to the mixer will pass through the mixer due to low "port isolation" and will appear in the target signal. Of course if you have ever worked with radio designs that is one of the reasons why they invented double and triple balanced mixers to reduce this effect amongst other things.
With an ideal mixer where the input desired frequency is Fc and there is some undesired out of band low frequency noise Fn and we are using a local oscillator of Fo then the ouput of the mixer will be (Fc - Fo) + (Fc + Fo) + (Fo + Fn) + (Fo - Fn). From this we see that the low frequency noise is now translated onto the Local Oscillator carrier frequency as Fo +/- Fn . Eg if our noise frequency is 60 hertz and our Lo is 20 Khz then the ouput of the mixer will be 19.940 khz and 20.060 khz.
Using an "ideal" mixer these two noise frequencies are easily removed with a low pass filter. If the port isolation of the mixer is low then the 60 hertz will appear at the op of the mixer and this is a problem.
Where can you get an "ideal" mixer ... well you can come pretty close in a direct sampling scheme where you sample with an ADC then do the mixing "digitally". You can do it in the analog world but you would need more sophistication than a simple chopper switch tyep demod.

Leave a comment: