Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

TGSL Tuning & troubleshooting

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dfbowers
    replied
    Originally posted by sdesic View Post
    I have tried nulling and I have made 00,8 mV AC ... without power it says 00,6 mV AC
    started from 300mV
    it is good BUT I have detection range of 1-2 cm

    While I was testing with RX coil off and voltmeter on about 2 minutes from start
    detector went beep, beep, beep ...
    3-4 times a second ... pots are not responding, when I changed position of coils then it stopped beeping.

    Any help would be appreciated.
    Is it coil or PCB ?
    What do to next ?
    That can be an indication of a dead battery. Also, make sure your speaker is far away from the coils.
    Don't spend too much time on nulling, just find the deepest null, mechanically secure them and leave them alone. What type of cable are you using?
    See post #5022 here: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...-SABRE/page201

    Leave a comment:


  • sdesic
    replied
    I have tried nulling and I have made 00,8 mV AC ... without power it says 00,6 mV AC
    started from 300mV
    it is good BUT I have detection range of 1-2 cm

    While I was testing with RX coil off and voltmeter on about 2 minutes from start
    detector went beep, beep, beep ...
    3-4 times a second ... pots are not responding, when I changed position of coils then it stopped beeping.

    Any help would be appreciated.
    Is it coil or PCB ?
    What do to next ?

    Leave a comment:


  • sdesic
    replied
    TGSL EDU (from Silverdog kit) is finally all completed and assembled with coils
    RX 26 ohm 6,62mH
    TX 24,9 ohm 6,02mH
    wound up on jig as described in manual
    (isolated, than wraped in mylar - conductive side out (left 1-1,5 cm blank for break in faraday cage)
    (maybe too much overlap - can it hurt ?)
    and plain wire wound for shield connection for both coils and as finish one more layer of isolation tape)

    connected two pots and switch
    connected with usb cable to PCB folowing manual - grounded on coil and on PCB

    tested on bench
    I have max 8 cm on 1 EURO coin in air if I place coils together

    when I switch to K2 i K3 connection I have no detection
    tried pots at various positions

    ballancing is not very clear for me
    my voltmeter has scale for 200mV AC but I don't trust it ... no oscilloscope yet...

    can someone please explain functions of switch K1,2,3 and pot DISK.
    if switch is on disk pot works and if switch is on all switch is doing ...
    Last edited by sdesic; 05-20-2013, 06:48 AM. Reason: addin something

    Leave a comment:


  • Davor
    replied
    If you want to get very precise just remove one turn to get below 6.5, as compacting the coil will increase inductance a bit.

    Leave a comment:


  • sdesic
    replied
    I am making coil for TGSL EDU.
    Wound 107 turns on coil jig... standard dimensions from manual for TGSL Coil making
    255x137 mm
    0.25mm copper anameled wire
    I have inductance of 6.53 mH and resistance of 27 ohms.
    It is still on jig.
    Is that OK ?
    Can I remove it and get going with isolation and shielding ?

    Leave a comment:


  • o_shq
    replied
    HI DEAR
    > PLZ IF U CAN HELP ME ABOUT SNIFFER XR 71 THAT I HAVE A PROBLEM WHEN I ASSEMBLAGE THE DEVICE
    > I HAVE 3 PROBLEMS
    > 1. WHEN I CONNECT THE LOOP THE FUSE BURN OUT I TRY TO FIND ANY SHORT I DIDN'T FIND ANY THING.
    > 2. THEIR IS SEPARATION I DON'T KNOW THAT IN THE CCT. CARD OR IN J1 & J2 IT WORK Intermittently.
    > 3. THE RANGE WITH 1 METER LOOP IS JUST 30 CM.
    > I APPRECIATE UR RESPONSE SO MUCH & THANK YOU.
    >

    Leave a comment:


  • Jerry
    replied
    Originally posted by golfnut View Post
    Hi Jerry,, "my goal was to be able to set a steady background tone when searching for coins"

    What do you get or need when you find a coin?



    Is it personal preference that you want a tone on continuously in order to give the impression of working the machine right on the sens threshold ??
    S
    Hi Steve,

    It is a personal preference which I think can give maximum depth out of a machine. However, since the TGSL is a motion only detector, just adding a threshold control did not give the desired results. I worked on it for quite a while last year until I happened on this old thread which showed that someone else had already tried this with about the same results. So I decided to give it a rest for a while.



    Jerry

    Leave a comment:


  • golfnut
    replied
    Hi Jerry,, "my goal was to be able to set a steady background tone when searching for coins"

    What do you get or need when you find a coin?



    Is it personal preference that you want a tone on continuously in order to give the impression of working the machine right on the sens threshold ??

    S

    Leave a comment:


  • dfbowers
    replied
    I couldn't find the link to the latest, so here it is.
    Don
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • starmoml
    replied
    Hello. show me breakdown on the circuit schematic. PLEASE help me

    Leave a comment:


  • Jerry
    replied
    I happened upon this old thread started by Porkluvr in 2008 which sums up and sheds some light on what I was trying to do.



    It is interesting on how the same subject keep coming back from time to time.

    Jerry

    Leave a comment:


  • Jerry
    replied
    Originally posted by Davor View Post
    Gee, you made a completely different approach. On the IGSL topic I replied to you with explanation about the TGSL opamp bias problem, and you already fixed that by the other approach. My suggestion was to go for FET input opamps instead. This works too - either the mountain comes to Muhammad or Muhammad goes to the mountain.

    BTW, I found that replacing R43 with 680k works perfectly for me. Simulation says 750k would be even better, but I don't have any in my stash, and I cant buy any on my li'l island.
    Sorry for the confusion. The above diagram (I will call it the Lobo Mod) was something that I had already done to my original TGSL which I was not completely happy with and was still looking for a better solution. Which is about the time you offered your thoughts.

    I tried your suggestions on another TGSL and like the results. So now I have one TGSL with your mod and another one with the Lobo mod. I was hoping there would be some benefit of incorporating the two.

    Both of these detectors are working very well, but I always am looking for things to tweak them a bit.

    Thanks for the tip on R43. I will give that a try.

    Jerry

    Leave a comment:


  • Davor
    replied
    Gee, you made a completely different approach. On the IGSL topic I replied to you with explanation about the TGSL opamp bias problem, and you already fixed that by the other approach. My suggestion was to go for FET input opamps instead. This works too - either the mountain comes to Muhammad or Muhammad goes to the mountain.

    BTW, I found that replacing R43 with 680k works perfectly for me. Simulation says 750k would be even better, but I don't have any in my stash, and I cant buy any on my li'l island.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jerry
    replied
    Another thing I picked up on yesterday is my original attempt at the threshold modification to my original TGSL (Ivconic board) was actually working better than I realized. The picture below shows the change I made several months ago. This is the threshold circuit from other Tesoro products like the Lobo.

    Originally, I was not happy with this mod because my goal was to be able to set a steady background tone when searching for coins. This is the reason why I proceeded to mod my second TGSL (EDU board) according to Davors suggestions.

    What I accomplished with the EDU board is very nice Proportionate audio which is settable from a low volume to total saturation. However, there still is no background tone.

    I took the original TGSL out to the test garden yesterday. By chance, I turned it on while the coil was about three feet off the ground and heard the very nice, stable background noise of the TGSL. No crackles or pops, just a nice tone. It took me a while, but I figured out the I had the threshold set to max and backing it off quieted the tone. However, when I lowered the coil to the ground, the tone also went away. The reason this was a surprise is I normally turn the detector on when the coil is close to the ground so had not heard that steady tone before. I thought my mod was not working.

    I then learned that the area near the ground in which the tone would not be heard was controllable with the GEB setting, very similar to this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhTtkGCisfQ

    So my next step is to incorporate Davor's mods along with the threshold mode shown below. Hopefully this will combine the best of both detectors.

    Jerry
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Jerry
    replied
    Originally posted by Davor View Post
    Try bobbing the coil over a real ground when fine tuning the ground balance. You'll be surprised how good it works.

    So where is the catch?!

    Easy. Ferrite has no conductivity, so a ground balance setting achieved using ferrite would be 90° sharp. Real ground has some conductivity, so it's vector is not exactly at 90° but a bit towards the real side, or more ohms on your GEB potentiometer. The biggest catch of all is that this vector angle will not change with elevation of a coil above ground, so bouncing the coil up and down will induce some voltage in a GEB channel if your ground balance is not zeroed against that particular soil. When you hit the bulls eye, your toy will be silent, and your targets just perfect.
    That is what I normally do. I was just trying to give an indication of what direction I adjusted the GEB.

    Jerry

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X