field test unit no 001 "model T"

[Doug2]

Robby, your examples are exactly what I strive for here... technical discussion without the name-calling. I think you'll be hard pressed to find where I called John a wanker, or even an idiot, despite his own use of such terms. Mind you, Mr. Heenan was a superbly tough case and I probably deserve a gold star for staying on track.

How can one have an informed technical discussion when a new detector and its inventor are ridiculed and belittled by some folk (who may have an undisclosed vested interest in destroying the creditability of any new potentially marketable detector) and who clearly know nothing about it and even less about its circuits, data acquisition and signal processing or other relevant info!

[Doug2]

You have learnt well from Doug, haven't you Moodz. You cannot present logic with respect to the science because you are out of your depth, so you have to attempt to win points by denigrating the person.

Simply asking some relevant questions and making some relevant points! Its that's what you consider crap then we have different standards!!

ps replied to wrong post! this post was a reply to Carls post 983
Very fatigued due to lack of sleep (new born puppies)

[Carl-NC]

Well Carl I think you were just as naughty here... http://finders.com.au/forum/viewtopi...644&highlight=

and very naughty here... http://finders.com.au/forum/viewtopi...r=asc&start=75

and we won't mention your equally naughty antics on Zgus.

But I think the above links show that you were much more fun before you grew up and left grade school.

.

Robby, your examples are exactly what I strive for here... technical discussion without the name-calling. I think you'll be hard pressed to find where I called John a wanker, or even an idiot, despite his own use of such terms. Mind you, Mr. Heenan was a superbly tough case and I probably deserve a gold star for staying on track.

[Carl-NC]

I have banned or got rid of the people that posted crap or flamed on my forum! So we both agree!

Then why are you on my forum, trying to stir up crap? Go away, please.

[Paul99]

....all those threads prove is that you are technically vacuous rh and love arguing semantics which you don't understand the meaning of anyway. Carl was only trying to establish a point which you can't even see because it's beneath your cognitive ability.

You have learnt well from Doug, haven't you Moodz. You cannot present logic with respect to the science because you are out of your depth, so you have to attempt to win points by denigrating the person.

[moodz]

Well Carl I think you were just as naughty here... http://finders.com.au/forum/viewtopi...644&highlight=

and very naughty here... http://finders.com.au/forum/viewtopi...r=asc&start=75

and we won't mention your equally naughty antics on Zgus.

But I think the above links show that you were much more fun before you grew up and left grade school.

.

....all those threads prove is that you are technically vacuous rh and love arguing semantics which you don't understand the meaning of anyway. Carl was only trying to establish a point which you can't even see because it's beneath your cognitive ability.

[Nupi]

Definition of crap
There are 2 definitions of crap in English:

Pronunciation: /krap
• vulgar slang
NOUN

1Something of extremely poor quality.
1.1Nonsense.
1.2Unwanted articles; rubbish.
2Excrement.
2.1 [IN SINGULAR] An act of defecation.
VERB (craps, crapping, crapped)

1Defecate.
2 (crap on) Talk at length in a foolish or boring way.
ADJECTIVE

Extremely poor in quality.
Origin

Middle English: related to Dutch krappe,
from krappen 'pluck or cut off', and perhaps also to Old French crappe 'siftings',
Anglo-Latin crappa 'chaff'. The original sense was 'chaff', later 'residue from rendering fat',
also 'dregs of beer'. Current senses date from the late 19th century.

[robby_h]

Again??? Seriously? Paul, Robby: do you guys really feel threatened by Moodz & Aziz? Doug, Moodz: do you guys feel obligated to respond to every single comment Paul & Robby make? C'mon guys, time to grow up. We're not in the grade school any more.

Well Carl I think you were just as naughty here... http://finders.com.au/forum/viewtopi...644&highlight=

and very naughty here... http://finders.com.au/forum/viewtopi...r=asc&start=75

and we won't mention your equally naughty antics on Zgus.

But I think the above links show that you were much more fun before you grew up and left grade school.

.

[Doug2]

Unlike you, I don't "love this stuff." The crap, that is.

I have banned or got rid of the people that posted crap or flamed on my forum! So we both agree!

[Carl-NC]

Unlike you, I don't "love this stuff." The crap, that is.

[Doug2]

Hey Doug, you love this stuff... open up your forum, wide open, nothing barred, no one excluded, no one banned for any reason. Traffic will go through the roof, guaranteed.

Why don't you follow this advice with this forum?

[Carl-NC]

Again??? Seriously?

Paul, Robby: do you guys really feel threatened by Moodz & Aziz?
Doug, Moodz: do you guys feel obligated to respond to every single comment Paul & Robby make?

C'mon guys, time to grow up. We're not in the grade school any more.

Hey Doug, you love this stuff... open up your forum, wide open, nothing barred, no one excluded, no one banned for any reason. Traffic will go through the roof, guaranteed.

[Paul99]

How can you draw valid conclusions from a few a pixels of a big picture?
Someone needs to change their brand of parrot seed!

I see the usual derogatory vitriol from you Doug. It's a pity you cannot lift your game.

[Doug2]

The average reader would expect you to at least reply with something that indicates why you do or don't have to address X and viscosity but it seems you think that claiming to be a genius will suffice. Shouldn't that claim be followed with the usual "sigh"?

"Your a guy who makes hot air balloons telling the guy with the jet engine that it won't work".

I think by now most people would know that the above is the response you give when you have no response.

How can you draw valid conclusions from a few a pixels of a big picture?
Someone needs to change their brand of parrot seed!

[robby_h]

You are so fixated on x and r and this is what blinds you. ( similar to your theories on diodes and square waves lol ) ..... Your a guy who makes hot air balloons telling the guy with the jet engine that it won't work.

The average reader would expect you to at least reply with something that indicates why you do or don't have to address X and viscosity but it seems you think that claiming to be a genius will suffice. Shouldn't that claim be followed with the usual "sigh"?

"Your a guy who makes hot air balloons telling the guy with the jet engine that it won't work".

I think by now most people would know that the above is the response you give when you have no response.