Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SMT Bandito Info/Build

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Silver Dollar
    replied
    Well I opened up that Tesoro coil today. It is actually called Deep Search and it looks like an
    omega possibly. Not sure why centertapped or why TX resistance is so much. Here's some pics;

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN5973.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	165.4 KB
ID:	341271

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN5974.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	170.1 KB
ID:	341272

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN5975.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	256.7 KB
ID:	341273

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN5976.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	227.8 KB
ID:	341274

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN5977.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	154.7 KB
ID:	341275

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN5978.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	98.5 KB
ID:	341276

    The graphic paint reads 10k per inch in spots (bottom cover) and 5k per inch in other spots (top cover)...

    Leave a comment:


  • Silver Dollar
    replied
    Oh i found that quote from Davor "It has 20k in series with the bilateral switch that is 50% time open (thus behaving as a 40k resistor) and a 220n capacitor, giving a -3dB point at 18Hz"

    I had good results on the SMT Bandito changing that cap to 20n = 180hz but not so good on the real Bandito, it seemed to allow more noise through...

    Leave a comment:


  • Silver Dollar
    replied
    I'm trying to figure out the filters just after the input opamp and it seems to be designed wrong.
    The classic bandpass has a highpass set lower than the lowpass (say 1 khz to 30 khz) but the
    bandito has the highpass higher than the lowpass (723 hz to 79 hz) somewhere I had a blurb
    about how the 4066 switch affects this but cannot find it right now.

    Does anyone have any ideas about why they set the filters like this?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Filters.png
Views:	1
Size:	18.3 KB
ID:	341225

    Leave a comment:


  • Silver Dollar
    replied
    Here's one more tweak. The 100n cap at the last LM358 determines the size pulse
    that gets through to the speaker. I have reduced it to 22n in the past but here find
    that a 47n + 22n (69n) gives the best response. I can discern targets to approximately
    10 inches with this mod. Not sure how it will work in the ground but I believe you can
    reduce the sens if it proves to be a problem...

    Click image for larger version

Name:	BanditoMod1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	281.8 KB
ID:	341223

    (it's the one circled in orange)

    It is very difficult to remove parts from this substrate so be careful if you attempt this mod...

    Leave a comment:


  • Silver Dollar
    replied
    I did a couple of Mods to the Original Bandito today. I will take it to the beach
    this weekend and wanted it to be "tuned up" for the job.

    I use a cap substitution box to set the RX cap to the best value. The cap is
    actually 2 caps stock. A 10 nf is on the regular PC board so I removed that
    and substituted some in it's place. The original measured 9.45n and the new
    one is 11.1n. That gained me maybe 1/2" in the air, it doesn't make a huge
    difference but maybe some marginal targets will be heard!

    I also replaced the threshold pot on the back of the unit with fixed resistors.
    That sets the amount of volume change with depth and I don't imagine ever
    adjusting it.

    I found the cap that sets the length of the tune on battery check beep too.
    It was a 10uf on the back side of the sub straight and I changed it to 1uf
    so now a nice short beep to let you know it's on but not announce it too much!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	BanditoMod1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	280.0 KB
ID:	341220

    Click image for larger version

Name:	BanditoMod2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	53.2 KB
ID:	341221

    Click image for larger version

Name:	BanditoMod3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	76.5 KB
ID:	341222

    Leave a comment:


  • Koala
    replied
    Originally posted by Silver Dollar View Post
    [ATTACH]30554[/ATTACH]

    I got the widescan coil today. It is 7" and has a centertapped RX. A funny thing though the
    RX coil measures 6.1 mh and 17 ohms but the TX measures 6.1 mh and 27 ohms! It almost
    seems they swapped the TX and RX but the centertap is on RX...

    It also doesn't perform as well as the Brown 8" concentric. On coins the Deepsearch does 6"
    where the Brown Concentric does 7". I thought the DD coils were supposed to go deeper?

    The null acts just like my homemade centertapped coil. With just TX connected a scope
    across the RX reads 4.7V p/p but connecting the shield to ground gives no signal at all!
    By the way there is no connection at all from the shield to RX or TX in the coil. The center
    of the RX is tied to TX ground. The wire seems a bit cheezy and is very short. I'd like to
    get inside it and rewire it at least and maybe lift the centertap? I started running an exacto
    around it but it might be a bit difficult to cut all the way through...


    I thought a concentric were deeper. DD have the same depth ish down the center of the coil where as the concentric is only deep at the center and drops off quickly.


    Resistance of you new coil do appear odd

    Leave a comment:


  • Silver Dollar
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DeepScan.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	46.3 KB
ID:	341207

    I got the widescan coil today. It is 7" and has a centertapped RX. A funny thing though the
    RX coil measures 6.1 mh and 17 ohms but the TX measures 6.1 mh and 27 ohms! It almost
    seems they swapped the TX and RX but the centertap is on RX...

    It also doesn't perform as well as the Brown 8" concentric. On coins the Deepsearch does 6"
    where the Brown Concentric does 7". I thought the DD coils were supposed to go deeper?

    The null acts just like my homemade centertapped coil. With just TX connected a scope
    across the RX reads 4.7V p/p but connecting the shield to ground gives no signal at all!
    By the way there is no connection at all from the shield to RX or TX in the coil. The center
    of the RX is tied to TX ground. The wire seems a bit cheezy and is very short. I'd like to
    get inside it and rewire it at least and maybe lift the centertap? I started running an exacto
    around it but it might be a bit difficult to cut all the way through...

    Leave a comment:


  • Silver Dollar
    replied
    Well it appears the TGSL works worst than the Bandito SMT now. I was getting 5 - 6"
    and then tried a few different speakers. I found one that allows 8" or so but I'm not sure
    it will fit in the case!

    I decided to make a Minelab Coil for it. I have 1 mh TX and 14 mh RX but it didn't allow any
    adjustment inside the coil shell so I took off the shielding and redid it with thinner tape. Now
    it just makes it! That's another thing to watch for when building a coil. It doesn't matter if
    it works great if it doesn't fit in the case!

    Leave a comment:


  • Silver Dollar
    replied
    Well I tried a DD but it came out a bit noisy and heavy! I tried using a centertapped
    RX instead of shielding and used Concrete epoxy instead of potting compound.

    I have the original Bandito coil and a 7" Widescan DD Tesoro coming.
    I found that one for $35! It will cost me that to get the good potting epoxy!

    I prefer working on the electronics anyways...

    I just picked up an IDX board from Silverdog. I'll try putting that in my daughters
    Bounty Hunter Jr with the 7" Tracker ID coil I got last week.

    Leave a comment:


  • Koala
    replied
    Both the build and size even with the same build quality you are going to add 2" by building a 10" coil over the stock 8" if depth is your thing.

    I have two Whites 8" concentric coils I was surprised how well they were nulled there is only a few mV at the output of the pre amp I can't get anywhere near with my DD without using some ferrite to fine tune.

    I only build DD because they are easier and the wider scan per sweep. Looking on YouTube at monte's nail board test a smaller concentric is the way to go in infested sites.

    Leave a comment:


  • Silver Dollar
    replied
    Do you mean a better null on the coil? My home built coils don't work so good so I have
    been buying factory ones to make good detectors. I don't know the secret to making a
    good coil I guess...

    Leave a comment:


  • Koala
    replied
    Originally posted by Silver Dollar View Post
    I found a smaller TX usually gives more depth but also it should be adjusted to
    hit the power rail to avoid amplitude jitter then adjust the RX cap for best operation.

    I wonder if any tweaks can be done to the original Bandito to gain the extra depth?
    I wish I had another old CB radio to get another speaker...

    I put the filters back to stock so there are just a few mods left. The input gain is
    double and a cap here or there is a bit different value. Not sure I want to mess with
    my "test Standard".
    Pretty sure all older design Tesoro detector can be improved on with a better coil. Tesoro seem to have wanted a very stable detector. But this is the main reason that they had such a huge dedicated following.

    Leave a comment:


  • Silver Dollar
    replied
    I found a smaller TX usually gives more depth but also it should be adjusted to
    hit the power rail to avoid amplitude jitter then adjust the RX cap for best operation.

    I wonder if any tweaks can be done to the original Bandito to gain the extra depth?
    I wish I had another old CB radio to get another speaker...

    I put the filters back to stock so there are just a few mods left. The input gain is
    double and a cap here or there is a bit different value. Not sure I want to mess with
    my "test Standard".

    Leave a comment:


  • Silver Dollar
    replied
    Well the SMT Bandito just has a 3904 and 3906 and it's too loud with the CB speaker.
    With a tiny laptop speaker the volume was a bit low, so maybe look for a better speaker?
    More gain means more juice. I think the old speaker used more power too as my current
    meter only goes to 24 ma and it overloaded with that speaker but the new loud one
    still shows when sounding... (can't really read the value maybe 18 ma?)

    Leave a comment:


  • Koala
    replied
    What is the difference between MPSA13 and 14

    Same just higher gain

    link

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X