Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

felezjoo PI(the best pulse induction metal detector that I made until now)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ionut_mtb
    replied
    Originally posted by SWL View Post
    Hello! There is no backlight. On the circuit there is a resistance of 1 kOhm ... Shouldn't it be 100 Ohms? In the settings, the backlight level is 10.[ATTACH]48925[/ATTACH][ATTACH]48926[/ATTACH]
    Hello, R21 - 1k is correct. check voltage, led+- and before resistor also.

    Leave a comment:


  • SWL
    replied
    Hello! There is no backlight. On the circuit there is a resistance of 1 kOhm ... Shouldn't it be 100 Ohms? In the settings, the backlight level is 10.Click image for larger version

Name:	889.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	136.5 KB
ID:	356111Click image for larger version

Name:	888.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	45.2 KB
ID:	356112

    Leave a comment:


  • ionut_mtb
    replied
    Originally posted by Vadim18 View Post
    Ok, that's good result. Now you see how shielding affect to sensitivity.
    If you have time to do some testing - try to put copper plate or mesh shield on top of MCU and bottom. Idealy the best way is to isolate all digital part with shield, cos MCU makes alot of random noise and interference.
    Also, at least in theory, ferrite bead between op-amp (pin6) and MCU(pin23) will suppres noise coused by cross capacitance (nobody mentioned abouth it)
    i think all the small things makes a difference in performance of a detector.

    "Digital circuitry inside and outside the device generates EMI which might affect the accuracy of analog measurements. If conversion accuracy is critical, the noise level can be reduced by applying the following techniques: 1. Keep analog signal paths as short as possible. Make sure analog tracks run over the analog ground plane, and keep them well away from high-speed switching digital tracks. 1.1. The AVCC pin on the device should be connected to the digital VCC supply voltage via an LC network as shown in the figure below. 1.2. Use the ADC noise canceler function to reduce induced noise from the CPU. 1.3. If any ADC [3:0] port pins are used as digital outputs, it is essential that these do not switch while a conversion is in progress. However, using the 2-wire Interface (ADC4 and ADC5) will only affect the conversion on ADC4 and ADC5 and not the other ADC channels."

    Click image for larger version

Name:	avcc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	53.0 KB
ID:	356036



    also post #6

    Leave a comment:


  • useus
    replied
    Originally posted by Vadim18 View Post
    Also, at least in theory, ferrite bead between op-amp (pin6) and MCU(pin23) will suppres noise coused by cross capacitance (nobody mentioned abouth it)


    Nice experiments!

    I'm interested, if someone has ferrite bead is able to do a test I would be happy to know the results

    Leave a comment:


  • Vadim18
    replied
    Ok, that's good result. Now you see how shielding affect to sensitivity.
    If you have time to do some testing - try to put copper plate or mesh shield on top of MCU and bottom. Idealy the best way is to isolate all digital part with shield, cos MCU makes alot of random noise and interference.
    Also, at least in theory, ferrite bead between op-amp (pin6) and MCU(pin23) will suppres noise coused by cross capacitance (nobody mentioned abouth it)


    Nice experiments!

    Leave a comment:


  • ionut_mtb
    replied
    Originally posted by Vadim18 View Post
    Hi ionut_mtb!
    If i understand you properly, this may help.
    [ATTACH]48814[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH]48815[/ATTACH]
    Thank’s, i was thinking the same. Yesterday i’ve noticed something interesting, after installing metal shield to the board i’ve managed to run the detector inside apartment at sensitivity 18 (usualy i can run it at max 12 indoor) and detection depth for 1euro was aprox 35cm.
    Detector is more stable. Click image for larger version

Name:	CE395942-0062-42D7-8D9C-27220C88BA76.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	908.5 KB
ID:	356019

    Leave a comment:


  • Vadim18
    replied
    Originally posted by ionut_mtb View Post
    How should be connected corectly rg58 cable to board?
    Hi ionut_mtb!
    If i understand you properly, this may help.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	HowTo_connect_coax_cable_to_Felezjoo.png
Views:	1
Size:	21.4 KB
ID:	356017
    Click image for larger version

Name:	PCB Layout.png
Views:	3
Size:	179.9 KB
ID:	356018

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    Originally posted by Suvabard View Post
    What do these magic numbers actually represent?
    Time constants.

    Leave a comment:


  • ionut_mtb
    replied
    Originally posted by SWL View Post
    Soldering....
    very smart, thank you. I’m referring on witch side should be connected the shield

    Leave a comment:


  • SWL
    replied
    Soldering....

    Leave a comment:


  • ionut_mtb
    replied
    How should be connected corectly rg58 cable to board?

    Leave a comment:


  • LUPENGR29`
    replied
    These number contains the sensitive-power-balance and more charactiristics of the coil... Different coil different numbers different LF different numbers again....

    Leave a comment:


  • Suvabard
    replied
    Originally posted by useus View Post
    I have no way to try it on the field until the end of the month, unfortunately I am injured and I cannot move, if there are substantial differences I will let you know even if I do not think there is a visible difference, before I had the values ​​not perfect but very close (300 698 803). Value B I noticed that varies by changing impulse,
    also the value C but is much more stable, the problem is that it also varies with A so I put a 470ohm potentiometer in place of R11 to be able to adjust it at will even changing the pulse value. I obtained the perfect C value using a coaxial cable,
    unfortunately I can't tell you the model because nothing is written but looking at it I'm almost sure it's a RG58
    What do these magic numbers actually represent?

    Leave a comment:


  • marin2
    replied
    Hi everyone, it's been a long time.
    I dusted off my felezjoo card to show you the spool with the LITZ thread.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20191204_231548.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	399.7 KB
ID:	355838
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20191204_231357.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	848.9 KB
ID:	355839
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20191204_231357.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	848.9 KB
ID:	355839Click image for larger version

Name:	20191204_230904.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	873.0 KB
ID:	355840
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20191204_230806.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	975.5 KB
ID:	355841
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20191204_230806.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	975.5 KB
ID:	355841
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20191204_230706.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	355842
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20191204_230736.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	892.1 KB
ID:	355843

    Leave a comment:


  • ionut_mtb
    replied
    Originally posted by LUPENGR29` View Post
    What resistor used for the 390ohm 2W ??? Metal oxide? or metal film?
    Metal Film Resistors - Through Hole 2watts 392ohms 1%

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X