Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Metal detector for finding archery arrows

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mr.Jaick
    replied
    hello everyone
    I have a question about different metals detection properties and i think it's relevant to this thread so...

    which metal responds like gold when metal detecting with either a pulse induction or a VLF detector??
    like in terms of depth.

    this is what i'm currently thinking:
    copper for pulse induction because it's detecting based on conductivity ?!
    and nickel for VLF because of the similar phase shift ?!

    Leave a comment:


  • Mothough
    replied
    I finally found time to build up half of the Whites SurfPI Pro design.

    I'm not sure if I got the pulse generation stuff right though. Anyone wanna take a quick look?

    Trace captured at different timebases: Click image for larger version

Name:	1us.png
Views:	1
Size:	39.2 KB
ID:	358522 Click image for larger version

Name:	5us.png
Views:	1
Size:	36.7 KB
ID:	358523 Click image for larger version

Name:	50us.png
Views:	1
Size:	37.0 KB
ID:	358524

    Probes are attached like this: Click image for larger version

Name:	surfpipro.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	170.8 KB
ID:	358525

    Leave a comment:


  • Carl-NC
    replied
    Originally posted by Mothough View Post
    You mean that the Surf PI does not have ground balance? I thought PI detectors do not need it because they are not susceptible to mineralized ground like it is common on beaches?
    Many soils have a fast enough decay that a standard PI doesn't see them. Soils that have a significant decay require a true ground-balancing PI. Probably your soil is of the former.

    Leave a comment:


  • surfdetector
    replied
    Originally posted by Mothough View Post
    For now I'll try to build up the Surf PI design because I can do that without spending any money. Then I'll have at least a reference, since I do not own any metal detector equipment. In the following weeks I'm quite busy, so I'll probably not get to it immediatly, however I'll keep you posted. Furthermore I found a few design variations mostly differing in component values. I also found a design where the ICL7660 voltage converter seems to be synchronized and a gain potentiometer was added. Does anyone know which one is the most recent and most promissing design?
    You might do well to order a PCB from here:


    He is a forum member and his boards have a lot of mileage from the members.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mothough
    replied
    Originally posted by green View Post
    Don't know what your ground is like.
    Ground is former arable land and was used for all kind of crops and since about 10 years is managed as mowed fodder meadow.

    Originally posted by green View Post
    With my ground I wouldn't purchase or build a detector that couldn't GB.
    You mean that the Surf PI does not have ground balance? I thought PI detectors do not need it because they are not susceptible to mineralized ground like it is common on beaches?


    For now I'll try to build up the Surf PI design because I can do that without spending any money. Then I'll have at least a reference, since I do not own any metal detector equipment. In the following weeks I'm quite busy, so I'll probably not get to it immediatly, however I'll keep you posted. Furthermore I found a few design variations mostly differing in component values. I also found a design where the ICL7660 voltage converter seems to be synchronized and a gain potentiometer was added. Does anyone know which one is the most recent and most promissing design?

    Leave a comment:


  • green
    replied
    Don't know what your ground is like. With my ground I wouldn't purchase or build a detector that couldn't GB.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ferric Toes
    replied
    A good and well established place is the dcg detector center in Rodenburg. Have a look at their website.
    www.detectorcenter.de

    Google DCG Detector Center if above does not work.

    Leave a comment:


  • waltr
    replied
    Originally posted by Carl-NC View Post
    You might want to visit a detector dealer and take an arrowhead with you. See what will & what won't detect it. If you are lucky, they may still have a Surf PI in stock (White's just went out of business). Once you know what will work, you can then figure out what you might be able to build if you want to go that route.
    Was just about to post this suggestion.
    Only way to really know is to try detectors on the arrow shaft you have.

    Maybe there is someone over there in the EU you can send a shaft to for testing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Carl-NC
    replied
    Originally posted by Mothough View Post
    Thanks again for all the effort and details you guys are putting into this. Looks like I have to save up for one of the suggested ones.

    Looking at the parts list of a Surf PI, they are all jellybean parts and I might be able to source them from my electronics bin and build one up on breadboard. Do you see any realistic chance that it would detect such an arrow head?

    Are there any similar VLF like designs and would it be benificial to further up their operating frequency to make them more sensible to stainless while sacrificing detection depth?

    You might want to visit a detector dealer and take an arrowhead with you. See what will & what won't detect it. If you are lucky, they may still have a Surf PI in stock (White's just went out of business). Once you know what will work, you can then figure out what you might be able to build if you want to go that route.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mothough
    replied
    Thanks again for all the effort and details you guys are putting into this. Looks like I have to save up for one of the suggested ones.

    Looking at the parts list of a Surf PI, they are all jellybean parts and I might be able to source them from my electronics bin and build one up on breadboard. Do you see any realistic chance that it would detect such an arrow head?

    Are there any similar VLF like designs and would it be benificial to further up their operating frequency to make them more sensible to stainless while sacrificing detection depth?

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    Originally posted by Carl-NC View Post
    This is similar to hunting gold nuggets, so I would suggest a VLF gold nugget detector. Something 15kHz or above. I doubt you need a high-end model (~$700) but the problem is there are not many low-priced gold detectors out there. The Fisher Gold Bug (digital) comes to mind but it is still $500. I would look for something used and older. The White's Goldmaster II or Goldmaster VSAT would be good choices. Avoid the really old White's Goldmasters in the big blue boxes, they will be useless. Another good option but hard to find is the White's GMZ, which was a stripped down GMT. Finally, an old Fisher Gold Bug would work well... this is the 1990's version that looks like the newer Gold Bug II, not the newer digital Gold Bug. Confusing, eh?
    Amen to that!

    Leave a comment:


  • green
    replied
    Originally posted by green View Post
    Target TC and corner frequency

    Question. If I made a target with aluminum foil same area and TC as head would they both detect at similar distances?
    Made a target with regular strength aluminum foil. Cut a piece 12mm x 36mm and folded into a piece 12mm x 6mm(6 layers). Measured 2.6us TC same as 6mm head.

    Leave a comment:


  • Carl-NC
    replied
    Originally posted by Mothough View Post
    The arrows have stainless steel heads which are 4 - 5mm (150 - 200 thou) in diameter, 3 - 5cm (1 - 2 inches) long and have a weight of 5 - 8 grams (0.2 - 0.3 ounces)
    This is similar to hunting gold nuggets, so I would suggest a VLF gold nugget detector. Something 15kHz or above. I doubt you need a high-end model (~$700) but the problem is there are not many low-priced gold detectors out there. The Fisher Gold Bug (digital) comes to mind but it is still $500. I would look for something used and older. The White's Goldmaster II or Goldmaster VSAT would be good choices. Avoid the really old White's Goldmasters in the big blue boxes, they will be useless. Another good option but hard to find is the White's GMZ, which was a stripped down GMT. Finally, an old Fisher Gold Bug would work well... this is the 1990's version that looks like the newer Gold Bug II, not the newer digital Gold Bug. Confusing, eh?

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    Originally posted by green View Post
    Target TC and corner frequency
    Such TC's obviously disqualifies most of the md models we know.
    Gold Bug 1 will not do it (19kHz).
    Gold Bug 2 ...? (70kHz)
    Gold Bug "digital"... ?

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    I always wanted to see how will Fisher Gold Bug (2) perform on such targets?
    If anybody have conditions to test it?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X