Why have you quoted MY post, when ( nearly ) all your questions are for Pito.?
Question 5: Increasing the gain of the pre-amp is not easy. If you change the 'top part' of the feedback components, you will have to change all of R10, R11, C13, C14. Changing the R values to +30% is easy, reducing the C values to 77% is harder, especially when they are unknown values.
If you change the 'bottom' of the feedback network, you have the unusual L-C tuned circuit to deal with. I think you should leave that alone. Put a 75 Ohm resistor across R14, to make it 20 Ohms, then add 150 nF ( or 100nF plus 68nF ) across C16, to make it about 630 nF.
This should increase gain by 35%.
Question 7 : I wondered about this too. Pito likes two-box machines, maybe he thinks this is your solution to great depth.
He also said "To double the range you need to increase amplitude 10x times". The truth is you would need to increase amplitude by 50 to 60 times to achieve this pointless depth increase.
Magnetic fields decay according to an 'inverse third power' effect. This applies to the transmitted field of the detector, AND to the field of the targets. So the actual received target signal decays as 'inverse sixth power'. So in theory, for a very large target many metres from the coil, you would need 64 times TX to get double distance. For sensible 40cm distance targets, maybe 50 times TX is OK.
Question 5: Increasing the gain of the pre-amp is not easy. If you change the 'top part' of the feedback components, you will have to change all of R10, R11, C13, C14. Changing the R values to +30% is easy, reducing the C values to 77% is harder, especially when they are unknown values.
If you change the 'bottom' of the feedback network, you have the unusual L-C tuned circuit to deal with. I think you should leave that alone. Put a 75 Ohm resistor across R14, to make it 20 Ohms, then add 150 nF ( or 100nF plus 68nF ) across C16, to make it about 630 nF.
This should increase gain by 35%.
Question 7 : I wondered about this too. Pito likes two-box machines, maybe he thinks this is your solution to great depth.
He also said "To double the range you need to increase amplitude 10x times". The truth is you would need to increase amplitude by 50 to 60 times to achieve this pointless depth increase.
Magnetic fields decay according to an 'inverse third power' effect. This applies to the transmitted field of the detector, AND to the field of the targets. So the actual received target signal decays as 'inverse sixth power'. So in theory, for a very large target many metres from the coil, you would need 64 times TX to get double distance. For sensible 40cm distance targets, maybe 50 times TX is OK.
Comment