Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Quasar
Collapse
X
-
-
on sale few of board Quasar ARM selling by Andy_F
pics inside the link
Comment
-
Thanks kt315
This video in the thread gained my interest again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zKPs0Fzss0&feature=youtu.be
However would have like to see what happens with smaller coins.
Comment
-
I meant small coin in the video
With my Bandido and there is a big difference with coin size and testing. With a large coin it can be touching a rusty nail and still be detected. However a cut half, sixpence or sovereign penny the best I can do is 1/2 the coil diameter or 3"
Here is what I have been testing with
~
We should come up with a standard test for recovery speed. I compare my home built against YouTube's "Norfolk wolf" test of a cut half and nail
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuASrFUdxQQ
Depth in fields near me is rarely the limiting factor
Comment
-
sorry, have nothing possibility to show something in english. seems Quasar ARM is unknown in your part of net, but it is not so big problem.
only russian... here is Part #2. guy tells about getting parcel with a kit...
part #3. the guy tells about components at the Quasar pcb soldering.
part #4. turning on and some tests.
Comment
-
Listen to what this guy has to say about the coin nail test -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeeNb6F9xMY
It makes a lot of sense, and is consistent with the results I get in my test garden. Even small ferrous stuff on the surface can mask out coins a few inches deep.
However, there is a variation on the wood, nail, coin test that involves placing the coin at a lower level than the nails. If you try that, you'll be surprised at some of the detectors that will fail dismally. This variation is consistent with the comments in the video, and with testing in the ground.
Comment
-
Kinda gone off topic and taking away from the Quasar which looks interesting. When I have some time will read through the threads on the other forum and make a decision whether to build one.
"However, there is a variation on the wood, nail, coin test that involves placing the coin at a lower level than the nails. If you try that, you'll be surprised at some of the detectors that will fail dismally. This variation is consistent with the comments in the video, and with testing in the ground"
I start a thread on here about this test. People who have identical size coils DD and concentric found that the DDs past the test and the concentric failed. I could not test for myself as I only have a 10" DD and 8" concentric for my IDX and 6" concentric for my Bandido.
To find target as close as possible to iron requires two thing. Good separation and quick recovery. As far as I can tell separation is purely due to the coil and recovery the detector.
Edit found thread
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?22702-Iron-masking
Back to the Quasar it looks to have good recovery and sensitivity to small targets so may well be a nice project for me.
Comment
Comment