Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

field test unit no 001 "model T"

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Aziz
    replied
    Originally posted by PATCHES JUNIOR View Post
    How much do you want? I only have a few hundred thousand.
    1 Minelab share!
    But from Minelab itself!
    *LOL*
    ^sif

    Leave a comment:


  • PATCHES JUNIOR
    replied
    Originally posted by Doug2 View Post
    Any technical info from you is worthless , will always be wrong and is always good for a laugh! I also do not pay anybody that tells willful and blatant lies! I have NEVER received any money from Woody! If you believe that i ever received any money from Woody then post the evidence here! ie put up or shut up! Please also stick to the topic!!!!!
    What topic is it you are talking about?

    Leave a comment:


  • PATCHES JUNIOR
    replied
    Originally posted by Aziz View Post
    PJ i told you before that any technical info you want from me is going to cost you. How much of that Greedlab money do you want to spend?
    *LOL*
    ^sif

    PS: I should open my betting office again. *LOL*

    How much do you want? I only have a few hundred thousand.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doug2
    replied
    Originally posted by PATCHES JUNIOR View Post
    doug i told you before that any technical info you want from me is going to cost you. How much of that woody money do you want to spend?
    Any technical info from you is worthless , will always be wrong and is always good for a laugh! I also do not pay anybody that tells willful and blatant lies! I have NEVER received any money from Woody! If you believe that i ever received any money from Woody then post the evidence here! ie put up or shut up! Please also stick to the topic!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Orbit
    replied
    Can someone make a coil which metal is detected on only one side directed coil ? means to on the upper side nothing is detected while on the other side a detection !

    Leave a comment:


  • Aziz
    replied
    Oh well, I've started BW's magnificent coil software.
    I want to know the answer first.

    ^sif

    Leave a comment:


  • Aziz
    replied
    Originally posted by PATCHES JUNIOR View Post
    doug i told you before that any technical info you want from me is going to cost you. How much of that woody money do you want to spend?
    PJ i told you before that any technical info you want from me is going to cost you. How much of that Greedlab money do you want to spend?
    *LOL*
    ^sif

    PS: I should open my betting office again. *LOL*

    Leave a comment:


  • PATCHES JUNIOR
    replied
    doug i told you before that any technical info you want from me is going to cost you. How much of that woody money do you want to spend?

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul99
    replied
    Originally posted by Doug2 View Post
    NOW PLEASE STICK TO THE TOPIC AND POST YOUR RECOMMENDED COIL TESTING PROTOCOL OR PROVE MY CLAIMS TO BE WRONG! As in law the onus is on you to prove your allegations that my claims are false! So put up or shut up! Now back to topic! Come on please tell us how you would test or compare a spider wound mono with a bundle wound mono of the same diameter! Can't be that hard for you can it? If this is too hard for you then tell us why a spider mono wound coil can never be better or as good as a bundle wound mono of the same diameter.
    Go and seek professional mental health help Doug.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doug2
    replied
    Originally posted by Paul99 View Post
    Doug, don't you have the intelligence to understand that you are the one making the performance claims for the coil, therefore you are the one who has to validate your claims, not me. Note, the "onus" is on you! The topic is whether you have the ability to justify your claims for the JS spider coil, and you don't!! And everyone is still waiting for you to justify making the claims you have made for the JS spider coil. Go seek professional psychiatric help Doug. Until you do you should not be allowed out in public.
    NOW PLEASE STICK TO THE TOPIC AND POST YOUR RECOMMENDED COIL TESTING PROTOCOL OR PROVE MY CLAIMS TO BE WRONG! As in law the onus is on you to prove your allegations that my claims are false! So put up or shut up! Now back to topic! Come on please tell us how you would test or compare a spider wound mono with a bundle wound mono of the same diameter! Can't be that hard for you can it? If this is too hard for you then tell us why a spider mono wound coil can never be better or as good as a bundle wound mono of the same diameter.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul99
    replied
    Originally posted by Doug2 View Post
    Now prove my statement about this coil to be factually incorrect!
    Doug, don't you have the intelligence to understand that you are the one making the performance claims for the coil, therefore you are the one who has to validate your claims, not me. Note, the "onus" is on you!

    Put up or shut up!And please stick to the topic!
    The topic is whether you have the ability to justify your claims for the JS spider coil, and you don't!!

    Still waiting for your recommended coil testing protocol!
    And everyone is still waiting for you to justify making the claims you have made for the JS spider coil.

    Go seek professional psychiatric help Doug. Until you do you should not be allowed out in public.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aziz
    replied
    As PJ and his mates do not work for free, I'll do the same now.

    Who is going to pay for the proof & scientific explanation?
    (You know, I can do it. *LOL*)
    ^sif,
    getting rich now... *LOL*

    Leave a comment:


  • Doug2
    replied
    Originally posted by Paul99 View Post
    Doug, don't try to direct the topic away from the factually incorrect statements you have made. We are talking about a coil that you are making performance claims for by stating this coil is "far superior to any commercial coil". For you to have any credibility, which you currently haven't, you need to detail how you tested and the results that you got to substantiate your statements. I have to prove nothing.
    Now prove my statement about this coil to be factually incorrect! Put up or shut up!And please stick to the topic! Still waiting for your recommended coil testing protocol!

    Leave a comment:


  • Aziz
    replied
    Hey moodz,

    you can step in the coil business and make some additional bucks to fund the first series of your detector.
    A ML beating coil for ML users.
    I'm sure they will pay a lot for some depth advantage.
    ^sif

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul99
    replied
    Originally posted by Doug2 View Post
    We are still waiting for YOUR RECOMMENDED COIL TESTING PROTOCOL.ie what test's should be done, why they should be done and the best way of doing them and how the test results should be interpreted with regard to other coils. Come on it should be easy for you and will be of interest to many members here!
    Doug, don't try to direct the topic away from the factually incorrect statements you have made.

    We are talking about a coil that you are making performance claims for by stating this coil is "far superior to any commercial coil". For you to have any credibility, which you currently haven't, you need to detail how you tested and the results that you got to substantiate your statements. I have to prove nothing.

    You have also failed to answer whether you support the statement JS made to SD detector users to only use channel 2. Do you believe it was good practice for an SD user to only use channel 2 as JS advised? Yes or No??

    Further, my understanding is that while JS may have had contact with you, he only had that contact to pee in your pocket in an attempt to avoid being the brunt of the ridicule you have so unjustifiably dished out through your forum to so many people. My understanding is that he did not hold you in high esteem at all, but then who does??

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X