Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

info baracuda kit

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • green
    replied
    Originally posted by Qiaozhi View Post
    Are you sure the preamp output is settling at 0V?
    From the scope shots it appears to be offset in the negative voltage direction.
    STEP 5
    RX preamp (see Fig. 7)
    Fit R4 (1k), R5 (1M), R6 (100k trimmer), R7 (1k), R8 (22k), R9, R22 (27R), R16 (150R), R18 (10k), C2, C18 (47u), C3, C15, C19 (100n), D1, D2, D6, D7 (1N414 and U2 (NE5534)
    Measure the DC voltage on U2 pin 6, and adjust R6 to give 0V

    Step 5 needs to use a scope to set preamp output to zero volts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Qiaozhi
    replied
    Originally posted by gallico58 View Post
    ok Qiaozhi,I adjusted trimmer r6 for 0Volt off set pin6 U2, I am attaching oscilloscope images .ch1 U4 pin4 - ch2 U2pin6.
    it all seems ok.
    It could be a disorder of the LT1054 synchronous?
    thank you
    [ATTACH]38565[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH]38566[/ATTACH]
    Are you sure the preamp output is settling at 0V?
    From the scope shots it appears to be offset in the negative voltage direction.

    Leave a comment:


  • gallico58
    replied
    Originally posted by Qiaozhi View Post
    The normal threshold setting is somewhere near the middle. Have you adjusted the Null Offset pot correctly?
    It might also be worth trying a 300uH coil, although 400uH should be just fine.
    Can you post a scope shot with channel 1 connected to U4 pin4, and channel 2 connected to U2 pin6? Set the scope to trigger on channel 1.
    ok Qiaozhi,I adjusted trimmer r6 for 0Volt off set pin6 U2, I am attaching oscilloscope images .ch1 U4 pin4 - ch2 U2pin6.
    it all seems ok.
    It could be a disorder of the LT1054 synchronous?
    thank you
    Click image for larger version

Name:	u44u26.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	50.3 KB
ID:	347650
    Click image for larger version

Name:	u441u261.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	50.6 KB
ID:	347651

    Leave a comment:


  • Qiaozhi
    replied
    Originally posted by gallico58 View Post
    excuse my English translator, I try to explain.the circuit works well, I optimized the dumping resistance (400ohm), as you suggested.
    the threshold when adjusted gets to a point that the metal emits an impulsive sound beeat .... beeat .... beeat ... until the true threshold.
    this for a small stretch of adjustment of the potentiometer.
    Not crazy I have to be at the limit of this swing is something missing in the sensitivity.
    but perhaps it should be so, if I'm sorry, it's my first md pulse, I have to figure it out.
    The normal threshold setting is somewhere near the middle. Have you adjusted the Null Offset pot correctly?
    It might also be worth trying a 300uH coil, although 400uH should be just fine.
    Can you post a scope shot with channel 1 connected to U4 pin4, and channel 2 connected to U2 pin6? Set the scope to trigger on channel 1.

    Leave a comment:


  • gallico58
    replied
    excuse my English translator, I try to explain.the circuit works well, I optimized the dumping resistance (400ohm), as you suggested.
    the threshold when adjusted gets to a point that the metal emits an impulsive sound beeat .... beeat .... beeat ... until the true threshold.
    this for a small stretch of adjustment of the potentiometer.
    Not crazy I have to be at the limit of this swing is something missing in the sensitivity.
    but perhaps it should be so, if I'm sorry, it's my first md pulse, I have to figure it out.

    Leave a comment:


  • Qiaozhi
    replied
    Originally posted by gallico58 View Post
    ok thanks I understand the procedure.

    adjusting just before the threshold is a disorder such as motorcycle to a minimum that keeps me from going further.
    being below that level it's all ok, quiet and functional.
    verified the +5 -5 ok no ripple, 12v battery ok
    it could be the cable unshielded coil connection?
    eliminating this would earn something more like sensitivity.
    any idea about it?
    thanks to all
    I thought you said you the detector was working well with good depth. Do you have a different problem?

    Leave a comment:


  • gallico58
    replied
    ok thanks I understand the procedure.

    adjusting just before the threshold is a disorder such as motorcycle to a minimum that keeps me from going further.
    being below that level it's all ok, quiet and functional.
    verified the +5 -5 ok no ripple, 12v battery ok
    it could be the cable unshielded coil connection?
    eliminating this would earn something more like sensitivity.
    any idea about it?
    thanks to all

    Leave a comment:


  • Qiaozhi
    replied
    Originally posted by gallico58 View Post
    OK thanksI will follow your advice, as I understand When I reach the critical damping? The sets the preamp output as instructed to 0 volts in the absence targets, Which optimum waveform?
    However, you are right, by adjusting the delay refuses small foils.
    thank you for your advice, I have to understand
    When the MOSFET is turned off, the voltage at the preamp output needs to decay to 0V as quickly as possible without oscillation. This is called critical damping.
    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/oscda2.html

    Leave a comment:


  • kt315
    replied
    Originally posted by gallico58 View Post
    OK thanksI will follow your advice, as I understand When I reach the critical damping? The sets the preamp output as instructed to 0 volts in the absence targets, Which optimum waveform?
    However, you are right, by adjusting the delay refuses small foils.
    thank you for your advice, I have to understand
    Maybe you should also read this ->
    Inside the METAL DETECTOR - Second Edition - Published 2015

    ISBN 978-0-9858342-1-0 (Also available for Kindle)

    Leave a comment:


  • gallico58
    replied
    OK thanksI will follow your advice, as I understand When I reach the critical damping? The sets the preamp output as instructed to 0 volts in the absence targets, Which optimum waveform?
    However, you are right, by adjusting the delay refuses small foils.
    thank you for your advice, I have to understand

    Leave a comment:


  • Qiaozhi
    replied
    Originally posted by gallico58 View Post
    thank you Quiaozhi
    my mistake, the frequency is about 700Hz
    theoretically increasing the delay should eliminate small aluminum objects.
    I increased the dumping resistance 470ohm, let's see how it goes, however it has good depth, good product kit.
    regards
    Try this damping resistor adjustment tool:
    10k pot in series with a 200R resistor, and a 2k resistor in parallel with both the pot and resistor. This will give you an adjustment range from 181R to 1672R.
    Attach your oscilloscope to the output of the preamp, and adjust the pot until you achieve critical damping. Disconnect the adjustment tool and measure the final resistance. Replace with a fixed resistor that has the closest value.

    Leave a comment:


  • gallico58
    replied
    thank you Quiaozhi
    my mistake, the frequency is about 700Hz
    theoretically increasing the delay should eliminate small aluminum objects.
    I increased the dumping resistance 470ohm, let's see how it goes, however it has good depth, good product kit.
    regards

    Leave a comment:


  • Qiaozhi
    replied
    Originally posted by gallico58 View Post
    HelloI finished assembling the baracuda kit, no problem during installation, calibration seem ok from oscilloscope images.
    the coil is 400uh 2omh.
    the depth is good, the threshold goes well, I do not understand what is the delay adjustment, it does not change me absolutely nothing adjustment, it depth, it discrimination.
    I do not understand what it's worth, those who help me? Grazie!!!

    http://uploads.im/GBPaJ.jpg 700 khz pulse
    http://uploads.im/OJmPS.jpg delay min
    http://uploads.im/s2pQE.jpg delay max
    The lowest delay setting achievable with your coil is around 20us, so that looks correct. If a PI can detect aluminium foil, then increasing the delay will eliminate the foil. Further increasing the delay will knock out pull tabs. Hopefully you're not expecting the Baracuda to discriminate against iron, as PIs discriminate targets based on conductivity.

    By the way, your pulse rate cannot possibly be 700kHz. It looks more like 700Hz to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • kt315
    replied
    those who help me?
    silverdog?

    Leave a comment:


  • gallico58
    started a topic info baracuda kit

    info baracuda kit

    HelloI finished assembling the baracuda kit, no problem during installation, calibration seem ok from oscilloscope images.
    the coil is 400uh 2omh.
    the depth is good, the threshold goes well, I do not understand what is the delay adjustment, it does not change me absolutely nothing adjustment, it depth, it discrimination.
    I do not understand what it's worth, those who help me? Grazie!!!

    http://uploads.im/GBPaJ.jpg 700 khz pulse
    http://uploads.im/OJmPS.jpg delay min
    http://uploads.im/s2pQE.jpg delay max
Working...
X