Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Very large DD coil

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dbanner
    replied
    I would try super D geometric pattern first. Just scale up from 19 inches to 38 inches. Then cut out pattern and place on board with nails to wind coils. Both Rx coils will have same number of turns. Aim for your target inductances and use coil calculator to approximate no. Of turns. You can tune the coils to correct resonance so that at null, phases will be correct.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Krzychu_
    replied
    Coils are large and interact with each other on a long length and surface, and in addition must be electritically shielded. The fluxes of the variable electromagnetic field of both coils must be compensated and the entire system must have an appropriate phase of response for proper operation of identification and discrimination. Arrangement from the point of view of geometry seems simple, because symmetrical, but, to obtain this symmetry may prove to be the most difficult problem to solve ... It remains to experiment in the absence of external disruptions, that is in the field, outside the city.

    Leave a comment:


  • dbanner
    replied
    They can then be tightened in place with plastic nut an bolts together with glue. If you want to try different Rx coil then all you have to do is disassemble from slide. This makes easier for experimenting with different coils for Rx.

    Leave a comment:


  • dbanner
    replied
    Cut grooves in ply along for each Rx will slide along perpendicular axis to tx coil. This make easy to fix null position

    Leave a comment:


  • dbanner
    replied
    For easy nulling I suggest you pot the Rx coils independent of each other in their own respective housing which can be rigged with a slide mechanism to easily
    adjust its null position with respect to tx coils.

    Leave a comment:


  • dbanner
    replied
    Your design looks interesting, where did you get the idea from? It looks somewhat like the gpz 19 inch super D coil shape. Bigger coil bigger EMI effect. Required very good shielding.

    Leave a comment:


  • Krzychu_
    replied
    OK, I intend to finish the transmission winding and pour it over the resin without electrostatic shielding, while the RX receiving winding pre-position and check the correctness of identification and discrimination. It's hard to predict the effect of the electrostatic screen on their final, mutual location. When balancing the coils, I will have to leave part of the loose section of the windings to correct their compensation

    Leave a comment:


  • kt315
    replied
    Kr_

    we do not have the experts here on big ramified coils to say you more. no data. i can give some recommendations and thas all.
    in my opinion you do not have to strengthen the windings in all constructive and have to test at first as temporary one.
    after getting good result then gather them and glue together.

    Leave a comment:


  • dbanner
    replied
    Then for capacitance issue, well ok, make sense. So you are not making big capacitance.
    My shock absorber theory was rubbish then.

    Leave a comment:


  • Krzychu_
    replied
    Thanx!
    I plan to make two RX windings on both sides of the TX transmit coil connected with antiparallel. This will be a simple system for verifying false signals from the coil excitation. I will consider single signals to be false, and double signals to be correct. Is it good idea?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	RX_TX_RX.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	40.5 KB
ID:	351342

    Leave a comment:


  • kt315
    replied
    see a table on right https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_permittivity

    look vacuum vs air RPs.

    Leave a comment:


  • kt315
    replied
    Originally posted by dbanner View Post
    Yes, it is for isolation from vibration at a certain frequency being transferred to coil. The rope acts like shock absorber.
    not. not vibration. we say again about εr --- is the relative static permittivity (sometimes called the dielectric constant) of the material between the plates (for a vacuum, εr = 1);

    look https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitance

    As a quantitative example consider the capacitance of a capacitor constructed of two parallel plates both of area A separated by a distance d. If d is sufficiently small with respect to the smallest chord of A, there holds, to a high level of accuracy:C=ε rε 0Ad{\displaystyle \ C=\varepsilon _{r}\varepsilon _{0}{\frac {A}{d}}}

    Leave a comment:


  • dbanner
    replied
    I can't say for sure,but tiny movements across such a long axis is amplified, and could affect the coil.

    Leave a comment:


  • dbanner
    replied
    Originally posted by Krzychu_ View Post
    OK, thanks for the advice. Did I understand correctly that enameled wire should be wrapped with a wide rope or tape? Is it because the coil so made does not transfer vibrations, tension and other unwanted effects from the resin to the windings?
    Yes, it is for isolation from vibration at a certain frequency being transferred to coil. The rope acts like shock absorber.

    Leave a comment:


  • Krzychu_
    replied
    OK, thanks for the advice. Did I understand correctly that enameled wire should be wrapped with a wide rope or tape? Is it because the coil so made does not transfer vibrations, tension and other unwanted effects from the resin to the windings?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X