Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Coil question?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by sbalio1 View Post
    hi green.
    why in the pi detector. When I increase the size of the coil. the detection distance does not increase much or nearly the same as that of a coil at least the size. In particular coil of size 1m.
    A lack of electrical voltage in the coil or a problem in the receiver
    Hi sbalio,
    What coil sizes are you comparing? Is the coil inductance the same? What is the target distance you are comparing at? Do you have an answer to any of the questions?

    Comment


    • #17
      hi green
      I used several coils with many types of threads: the best coil obtained by a good sensitivity to medium formats in particular.
      I did it as a litz 5 * 5 * 016
      coil 70 cm compared to the size of 20 cm and was the best result between all types of reels of this size. From 1.60 to 1.75 meters
      But in a reel of 1 meter with all kinds of reels did not exceed this distance to the size of 20 cm.In addition, some reels the size of 1 meter corresponded to the size of 20 cm less than 1.5 meters. Same thing for the size of 25cm

      yes the inductance of the coil is the same

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by sbalio1 View Post
        bbsailor Thank you

        I will follow the subject to understand how the distance is measured in relation to the radius of the coil.Because I didn't understand it correctly
        See this tutorial on coil sizes and types.
        http://www.mdhtalk.org/tutorials/coi...archcoils-.pdf

        Different coil types and sizes, like mono, DD, DOD or figure 8 work best on different soil types and hunting conditions. On wet beach sand you want to use a delay of 15 uS or more to not detect the wet sand as a target. On dry sand you can try to use the lowest amount of delay to find smaller targets.

        Different coil types such as mono coils require more overlap of search patterns to not miss deep targets at the tip of the coil penetration pattern typically deeper in the center of the coil. DD coils have a different penetrating pattern.

        The tutorial should help.

        Joseph J. Rogowski

        Comment


        • #19
          Thank you.bbsailor .green

          To understand my intention
          no problem of detection with coil like 20 cm and 40 cm and also with 75 cm. but the problem is with coil 1m or more .a the size of 20 cm metal


          did not spend a lot of time trying to classify a bigger size of 70 cm but a few attempts
          It's the quality of the threads that I made.
          To reduce the coil capacity.
          And to get a fast response coil and little noise and more stable
          The focus was on big coils.

          Click image for larger version

Name:	29853025_1004141706401990_802204514_n.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	18.8 KB
ID:	351972

          Comment


          • #20
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNyEBfy8AXI

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bULrStpPgRE&t=32s

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by sbalio1 View Post
              hi green
              I used several coils with many types of threads: the best coil obtained by a good sensitivity to medium formats in particular.
              I did it as a litz 5 * 5 * 016
              coil 70 cm compared to the size of 20 cm and was the best result between all types of reels of this size. From 1.60 to 1.75 meters
              But in a reel of 1 meter with all kinds of reels did not exceed this distance to the size of 20 cm.In addition, some reels the size of 1 meter corresponded to the size of 20 cm less than 1.5 meters. Same thing for the size of 25cm

              yes the inductance of the coil is the same
              Can you give an example? Coil A diameter_____? distance target X detected with Coil A______? Coil B diameter______? distance target X detected with Coil B______? What is target X______?

              See you have added a couple replies that I hadn't read yet. Maybe they will answer some of my questions.
              Last edited by green; 08-06-2018, 04:49 PM. Reason: added sentence

              Comment


              • #22
                hi green.
                coil A;75cm. target 20cm .detected 1.75m
                coil B;100 cm.target 20cm.detected 1.5m

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by sbalio1 View Post
                  hi green.
                  coil A;75cm. target 20cm .detected 1.75m
                  coil B;100 cm.target 20cm.detected 1.5m
                  Thanks, just what I was looking for. For interest I'll chart the two coils with HyperPhysics. If you still have the two coils, could you measure inductance and resistance?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I have an ESR tester that gives the inductance .frequency resonance of the coil and the resistance .il m gave
                    coil A 2.7 ohm.375 uh
                    coil B 3.4 ohm.360 uh

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Hi
                      Originally posted by bbsailor View Post
                      See this tutorial on coil sizes and types.
                      http://www.mdhtalk.org/tutorials/coi...archcoils-.pdf

                      Different coil types and sizes, like mono, DD, DOD or figure 8 work best on different soil types and hunting conditions. On wet beach sand you want to use a delay of 15 uS or more to not detect the wet sand as a target. On dry sand you can try to use the lowest amount of delay to find smaller targets.

                      Different coil types such as mono coils require more overlap of search patterns to not miss deep targets at the tip of the coil penetration pattern typically deeper in the center of the coil. DD coils have a different penetrating pattern.

                      The tutorial should help.

                      Joseph J. Rogowski
                      Reading through the PDF

                      A lot is copy and paste from the Internet.

                      Unfortunately the Internet is full of information Thats not checked

                      The wide scan vs concentric diagrams are wrong. Looks very like minelabs advertising images. I have checked my concentric 100% bogus

                      Four windings in a DD

                      A quarter goes from 5" to 14" with a 5" to 15 coil. Strange I get close to 10" In the ground with my home made Bandido on a similar size coin and a 5.5" coil

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by sbalio1 View Post
                        I have an ESR tester that gives the inductance .frequency resonance of the coil and the resistance .il m gave
                        coil A 2.7 ohm.375 uh
                        coil B 3.4 ohm.360 uh
                        HyperPhysics predicts the 100cm coil would have the same signal strength at 200cm(you are getting 150cm detection distance) as the 75cm coil does at 175cm. 100cm coil has more resistance(probably less peak current), less inductance so its going to have a little less signal. Not enough to see the difference you are seeing. Maybe noise or something else is causing that much lose in distance?
                        Attached Files

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by bbsailor View Post
                          See this tutorial on coil sizes and types.
                          http://www.mdhtalk.org/tutorials/coi...archcoils-.pdf
                          I agree with Koala, that's a poor tutorial with a lot of bad information.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            hi green
                            I already tried coil 100mm.resistance 1.3 ohm. with a copper wire 1mm pvc
                            The result was better than 1.5 meters but did not exceed 1.7m
                            Is the final size range of 20 is 1.7 meters or an increase in induction may increase more
                            in your opinion .
                            How to exceed 2 meters with 20 cm of volume with coil of 100 cm
                            How much can be .induction of the coil.and resistance.
                            where what size of coil.Is it possible as an example

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by sbalio1 View Post
                              hi green
                              I already tried coil 100mm.resistance 1.3 ohm. with a copper wire 1mm pvc
                              The result was better than 1.5 meters but did not exceed 1.7m
                              Is the final size range of 20 is 1.7 meters or an increase in induction may increase more
                              in your opinion .
                              How to exceed 2 meters with 20 cm of volume with coil of 100 cm
                              How much can be .induction of the coil.and resistance.
                              where what size of coil.Is it possible as an example
                              Hi sbalio
                              I'm replying, not because I know the answer but like you I wonder why the larger coil detects at less distance. The 100mm coil predicts twice the signal of the 75mm coil at 2meters. Should give an increase in detection distance of 20cm+ if inductance and noise stayed the same. If noise doubles with the 100cm coil, detection distance shouldn't change. Monitoring integrator out with a scope should give an indication of change in noise level.
                              I've charted target distance vs receive amplitude(same as HyperPhysics chart) by monitoring integrator out with a digital voltmeter. What PI circuit are you using? Do you have a scope? 30cm coil is the largest I've made so I'm trying to learn something with this thread. Maybe someone else could suggest what might be causing lose of detection distance or what to try to find out.
                              Attached Files

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Hi sbalio
                                Was looking at some comparison data, measured vs HyperPhysics I did awhile back. Tracks close out to coil diameter on all coils. Wondering if target size vs coil size might cause measured data to be less than predicted at the longer detection distances. Zapped my bench circuit awhile back, wondering if you could compare your 75cm and 100cm coil with a larger target, maybe 40cm target. Could be target size vs coil size does make a difference or I didn't take enough care when measuring the data. If you get a longer detection distance with the 100mm coil with the larger target I'll put something together to remeasure the coils with a 25mm and 50mm target to see if the larger target tracks better at the longer distances.
                                Attached Files

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X