Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
PROJECT ETI566
Collapse
X
-
That is beautiful workmanship for a hobby project! And congratulations for being willing to undertake the task of ferrite inductor design and construction.
Modern 2-box industrial line tracers use circuitry a lot more sophisticated than what you have there (the Fisher TW-6 which I designed in the late 1980's is a superheterodyne). However in the case of on-handle operation where the transmitter is a meter away from the receiver and not 500 meters as in off-handle utility tracing, a simple circuit where you've paid careful attention to the circuit and physical construction details can perform about as well as a "modern" circuit.
--Dave J.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Thanks Dave J. and WM6, as the pot was used a core brand Thornton produced in my country (Brazil), with the following specifications:
- L1 (Tx) NP23/17 - 4900 IP6; ungapped (ue1560)
- L1 (Rx) NP23/17 - 4900 IP6; ungapped (ue1560)
- L2 (Rx) NP23/17 - IP6 400; (ue127)
The original materials are of the type Philips 3H1 (obsolete), and should be replaced by 3H3.
- L1 (Tx) P18/11 pot core Philips, 3H1 - 3400 ungapped (ue1620)
- L1 (Rx) P18/11 pot core Philips, 3H1 - 3400 ungapped (ue1620)
- L2 (Rx) P18/11 pot core Philips, 3H1 - 315. (ue149).
There are other brands, looking for the "ue" similar.
Comment
-
The enameled wire used is 32 AWG, wound as in the scheme, will be good.
Still about the pot core is worth remembering that this kind of material has high tolerance, the most appropriate is to get a large amount and testing with the coil, closing the pots to get the best result.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Baterista View PostThe enameled wire used is 32 AWG, wound as in the scheme, will be good.
Still about the pot core is worth remembering that this kind of material has high tolerance, the most appropriate is to get a large amount and testing with the coil, closing the pots to get the best result.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Baterista View PostNo, only the pot core L2 has an internal gap of 0.24 mm, according to the example.
There are statement in ETI Project 566 description:
"This unit has been specially designed around a germanium transistor and a silicone type cannot be substituted."
But in parts list we can found BCxxx type of transistors only - so silicone type. How did you solve this contradiction?
Comment
-
Originally posted by WM6Thanks. Which type of transistors did you use?
There are statement in ETI Project 566 description:
"This unit has been specially designed around a germanium transistor and a silicone type cannot be substituted."
But in parts list we can found BCxxx type of transistors only - so silicone type. How did you solve this contradiction?
Q1, Q3, Q6 - BC549
Q4, Q5, Q7 - BC559
Q8 - BC639
Q9 - BC640
Comment
Comment