Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IDX-PRO+VDI

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Koala
    replied
    if I was to build a new coil for my IDX I think I would be tempted to try an omiga style

    Seem to be getting good results on the Russian metal detecting forums. Its alleged to have the same VDI and pinpointing accuracy as a concentric but punches through mineralized ground more like a DD.

    https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%D...ih=486#imgrc=_

    Leave a comment:


  • wallker
    replied
    Originally posted by kt315 View Post
    whites 6.59kHz coil has a cap inside. you have to connect outer cap to tx winding, value in range 0.5-1.0uF.
    Hi kt,
    I did connected caps, my coil is open, still in bench mode, connected just for testing purposes.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	coil.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	85.3 KB
ID:	353819

    Leave a comment:


  • wallker
    replied
    IDX SMT Layout

    Added R41, R46.
    Corrected connection of C5, C6, R24 and VR3.
    Bom may need to be updated.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • kt315
    replied
    whites 6.59kHz coil has a cap inside. you have to connect outer cap to tx winding, value in range 0.5-1.0uF.

    Leave a comment:


  • wallker
    replied
    Just finished assembling the IDX smd board, that Koala posted.
    Corrected PCB a bit, and it works.
    I was too impatient and just wanted to see does it works, so i conected fast-wound 0.7 mm wire for tx coil and rx from IGSL.
    Poor detection due to bad coil specs and off resonce, but still works.

    Leave a comment:


  • wallker
    replied
    Thanks for confirmation.
    I was just too lazy to draw correct symbol.

    Leave a comment:


  • kt315
    replied
    this way

    Click image for larger version

Name:	White's IDX_sch.gif
Views:	3
Size:	103.0 KB
ID:	353675

    Leave a comment:


  • wallker
    replied
    Originally posted by kt315 View Post
    yup. almost. just add Zener diode on outputs of the comparators.

    typical mistake that you do not want fix and notice.
    thx for heads up kt315.
    Is this way ok?Click image for larger version

Name:	zener.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	31.2 KB
ID:	353674

    Leave a comment:


  • dbanner
    replied
    Originally posted by Tibuck19 View Post
    Question, IDX Pro red board, With my Scope in XY, Channel 1 probe on X and Channel probe 2 on Y, GB goes up and down, would that not be 0, Should it not be at the -95 - +95 left to right ? by switching the probes it does switch the GB alone the 95 Plain. With a Nickel it is being detected in the negatives not the positive, look at the little sketch please and tell me what you think. Seems like everything is all bunched up together besides Nickels and ferrous metals. I do not know if it is they way I have my Oscope set up or if there is a problem with the detector, the scope is Plugged right in to the detector with out a MCP602

    [ATTACH]45058[/ATTACH]
    Isn't the mcp602 setup on one side as inverting amplifier?

    Leave a comment:


  • dbanner
    replied
    Isn't the mcp602 setup on one side as inverting amplifier?

    Leave a comment:


  • wallker
    replied
    Originally posted by Koala View Post
    original is powered by 12v

    starts to fail when the unloaded pack measure around 9.5V

    runs at +4 and -4 so needs 8 volts. But there is also a voltage drop on the protection diode
    Thanks for clarifying that Koala.

    Leave a comment:


  • Koala
    replied
    original is powered by 12v

    starts to fail when the unloaded pack measure around 9.5V

    runs at +4 and -4 so needs 8 volts. But there is also a voltage drop on the protection diode

    Leave a comment:


  • wallker
    replied
    Should this MD run on 8 or 9 volts?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	0658225a.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	475.0 KB
ID:	353647
    Or even less, 4V, as shown on schematic???
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Schematic.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	83.0 KB
ID:	353648

    Leave a comment:


  • kt315
    replied
    yup. almost. just add Zener diode on outputs of the comparators.

    typical mistake that you do not want fix and notice.

    Leave a comment:


  • wallker
    replied
    Is this the correct version of schematic to compare with?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	schematic.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	748.1 KB
ID:	353630

    Also does anybody have it in sch file?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X