If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
So, "we" end up with a complex, "dirty" signal from the transmitting coil—featuring a "spike" equal to half the amplitude (a spike that will, moreover, pulsate)—which will inevitably affect subsequent processes, so to speak... Maybe it's not worth it?)
I just thought of another way. Somewhere on these forums someone presented a sinusoidal TX circuit that could achieve a very high voltage drive with a modest power supply. I don't remember much about it, maybe someone will know what I'm talking about and post a link to the thread.
A friend suggested me the schematic.
I simulated it but my waveform is not correct.
I just thought of another way. Somewhere on these forums someone presented a sinusoidal TX circuit that could achieve a very high voltage drive with a modest power supply. I don't remember much about it, maybe someone will know what I'm talking about and post a link to the thread.
Thanks dear Carl.
I tried to find the forum, but i could not.
About your number 3, can i use the ready inductor as L1?
For testing, do you think i should connect LTX to scope and see its sine form snd amplitude?
For the receiver, the bandwidth is important, and for the transmitter, the magnitude of the generated field (B~I*N) at a given supply voltage and the quality factor of the radiating system are important.
Regarding to your knowledge and experience, do you have any suggestions for increasing power of TX?
I just thought of another way. Somewhere on these forums someone presented a sinusoidal TX circuit that could achieve a very high voltage drive with a modest power supply. I don't remember much about it, maybe someone will know what I'm talking about and post a link to the thread.
Use a transformer to increase the voltage drive to the coil:
Use an impedance transformer as used on the MXT:
These are tricky to get right and only provide a 2x voltage boost at best.
Reduce the TX coil inductance. For a given coil size, transmitted field energy is proportional to the ampere-turns NI. I is proportional to V/L and L is proportional to N2 so, overall, TX field strength is proportional to N*V/L --> N*V/N2 --> V/N. So reducing N should boost field strength.
Thanks for your suggestion.
I want to test number 3.
In IDX, TX uses +8 and -8. So, i remove its TX and replace the number 3.
I produces 6.5K pulse using 555 as CLK.
In IDX, TX is 580uH with 1uF.
But is it possible to tell me values of Q1, R1, C1, C2, L1 and LTX?
Leave a comment: