Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IDX-PRO+VDI

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • golfnut
    replied
    that was another thing I was going to mention for oscillation, which could be called chatter at a defined rate... The builds using the Lmc6484 (from my experience) are a little more prone to chatter. The builds using the LF347 seem more stable. S

    Leave a comment:


  • ampirate
    replied
    _____Arduino VDI Experiments SCH Instructions_p47.pdf
    Originally posted by onuba View Post
    I think this all confused v4 v5 is not
    small error above-

    Pin A0 - > All metal (U3 PIN 1)
    Pin A1 - > All metal (U3 Pin 14)
    Ground - >Ground
    +5v power source.

    read number 6

    http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...108#post147108
    I am using the above Pdf attached file.
    U3 p1 -> U4 p5
    U3 p14 -> U4 p3
    Same pins - whats the point ?

    I only read about 0.1V change from these pins on the Oscilliscope - with Targets.

    Leave a comment:


  • onuba
    replied
    Originally posted by ampirate View Post
    Another question :

    Why does the VDI PIC Board Design use Mcp602 setup like the Lmc6484 on the IDX Pro Board ?
    What is different ? Why not just use the U5 p3 and p5 as Signals to the ADC directly ?

    - Why doesnt this work ? Why do these 2 signals (U4 p3 and p5) only vary less than 0.1V ?

    My signals only reported :
    sensorValueX = 319-320
    sensorValueR = 320-324
    - with and without Targets from Coins to Can.

    I think this all confused v4 v5 is not
    small error above-

    Pin A0 - > All metal (U3 PIN 1)
    Pin A1 - > All metal (U3 Pin 14)
    Ground - >Ground
    +5v power source.

    read number 6

    General tech discussions on all types of metal detectors: VLF, 2-box, BFO, off-resonance, PLL, etc. Questions, ideas, and anything else that moves you.

    Leave a comment:


  • ampirate
    replied
    Another question :

    Why does the VDI PIC Board Design use Mcp602 setup like the Lmc6484 on the IDX Pro Board ?
    What is different ? Why not just use the U5 p3 and p5 as Signals to the ADC directly ?

    - Why doesnt this work ? Why do these 2 signals (U4 p3 and p5) only vary less than 0.1V ?

    My signals only reported :
    sensorValueX = 319-320
    sensorValueR = 320-324
    - with and without Targets from Coins to Can.

    Leave a comment:


  • ampirate
    replied
    I tried the Arduino VDI from Arduino_VDI_Experiments.pdf .

    But, the U4 p3 and p5 only vary in range of about 0.1V .
    So, it always reported nothing or Quarter.

    It needs an OpAmp MCP602 or TL072

    Also, I think the Pdf is unclear or has typo.
    It states to tie the Arduino GND to IDX Pro GND - and shows this as BatV-
    But this would boost the X and R to 4V as base value.

    I think it should say to use OpAmps GND of 4V ,
    else use a Voltaege Divider and subtract Base Value in Program as:
    sensorValueX=sensorValueX-320
    sensorValueR=sensorValueR-324

    Leave a comment:


  • ampirate
    replied
    I had to remove the Shield, when adding Coil Windings.

    I did find a solution on the Internet ,
    - of placing a loose Loop of Wire (like 6inch Diam) across the Coil as a Fine Tuner.
    This helps a lot.

    Leave a comment:


  • Koala
    replied
    Originally posted by ampirate View Post
    For the time, I will stick with 10KHz with the 16V p2p.

    I have tweaked the RX cap to 27pf which gives me a 8-10inch range.

    But it has horrible stability - often chirps continuously without a Target for periods
    - maybe slightly swaying wires with breeze of hand or feet on floor causing slight table shake.
    For example, dropping the targets on the table next to it - sometimes sets it off chirping continuously - even if I remove the Target.

    Anything I should aim for - measuring the RX with the Oscilliscope ?
    Possibly you are talking about chatter if you have not shielded your coil yet. I can get chatter on a un shielded coil just by blowing across the top

    try for the lowest peak to peak to start with. Make sure your probes are not affecting the result measure at the detector end a easy mistake that I made once


    what measurement are you getting

    Leave a comment:


  • golfnut
    replied
    27nF !



    try ferrite reject, also take a peak at the preAMP output, make sure its not too big.



    If you can reject ferrite somewhere on the geb pot travel its not ffar off. If it wont, reduce the Rx cap in 2nF steps - the aim is a bit more sens, ferrite reject.

    As for stability, I have had this on a build, it got better with twisted pot, supply, speaker wires,
    I have currently got thin coax on the geb pot,..

    do you have un sheilded coils?

    Leave a comment:


  • ampirate
    replied
    For the time, I will stick with 10KHz with the 16V p2p.

    I have tweaked the RX cap to 27pf which gives me a 8-10inch range.

    But it has horrible stability - often chirps continuously without a Target for periods
    - maybe slightly swaying wires with breeze of hand or feet on floor causing slight table shake.
    For example, dropping the targets on the table next to it - sometimes sets it off chirping continuously - even if I remove the Target.

    Anything I should aim for - measuring the RX with the Oscilliscope ?

    Leave a comment:


  • golfnut
    replied
    Easy mistake, we all have done that one.

    If you have a solid 16Vpp 10kHz.

    You need to make a descision now...

    Stick on 10Khz machine or go for original Desgin?

    Leave a comment:


  • ampirate
    replied
    Originally posted by golfnut View Post
    ok, forget tweAKING the Rx cct for now -your main issue is you TX is crap.

    Your Tx supply is 8V ? should be.

    Your scope is reading correct AC voltages - your probes scale 1:1 and not 10:1 take a look at the writing on your probes.
    You are right ! - the darn Probe 10:1 switch was set.
    The Reading is about 16V P2P.

    Leave a comment:


  • golfnut
    replied
    ok, forget tweAKING the Rx cct for now -your main issue is you TX is crap.

    Your Tx supply is 8V ? should be.

    Your scope is reading correct AC voltages - your probes scale 1:1 and not 10:1 take a look at the writing on your probes.

    Leave a comment:


  • ampirate
    replied
    Originally posted by golfnut
    If you got a solid Tx volts of 15vpp
    No, I am reading 1V-1.5V P2P


    Originally posted by Koala View Post
    Are you talking about the External 33nf Cap ? Yes
    Small difference in capacitor value here can make a big difference to distance.
    So, what range am I adjusting around the 33nF ?
    What is expected as possible values for the Cap ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Koala
    replied
    Are you talking about the External 33nf Cap ?

    Yes

    Small difference in capacitor value here can make a big difference to distance.

    Leave a comment:


  • golfnut
    replied
    try ferrite, when you can tune it out with geb control - your phasing has to be correct.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X