field test unit no 001 "model T"

[UrbanFox]

Why should I respond to your b.s.?

Hey Aziz...Davor... did I ever tell you blokes I have nearly perfected Nuclear Fussion. With two "D" cells (they have to be fully charged) and a couple of mols of heavy hydrogen I can not only power a city the size of New York for a month, I also put out gold as a waste product. (Well, it's not waste really, I sell this gold for drinking money)

I carry this process out in a converted washing machine in my laundry, and also use the waste energy to heat water for my daily clothes washing cycle. When I say nearly perfected, the trouble I am having at the moment is some days there is not enough excess energy available to heat the clothes washing water properly.

But, I am keeping this IP to myself because I don't believe you blokes will believe my claims. (and I don't want the patent trolls getting my IP)

[UrbanFox]

Why should I respond to your b.s.? You don't need to believe in my claims. Do your own GB.

Aziz, ask the nurse if you can have your medication doubled at least for today.


Also, see if there is a detox programme for this WBGB disease and associated paranoia.

[Aziz]

So Aziz, you have no response to my answer to your test.


You appear to be saying with your R component that there is a phase shift where as there isn't any with a PI in the off period. (if you are seeing a phase shift in the off period, please show me this phase shift)


Guys like you and Davor are only belittling the science when you belittle others but offer no substantiation for your claims. Nobody on this forum has ever proposed a method to achieve GB in a pi design except the SD2000, GS4 and TDI until you, Aziz, made your claim re using X and R to solve the problem.


Davor, you have given your support to Aziz. Are you stating you know Aziz's method or are you just being disruptive?? Do you give credence to his statement that he combines X & R to achieve GB with PI?

Why should I respond to your b.s.? You don't need to believe in my claims. Do your own GB.

[UrbanFox]

(Note, this is a test.)

Hey UFox, why don't you give up? You and your friends don't deserve the WBGB technology.

So Aziz, you have no response to my answer to your test.


You appear to be saying with your R component that there is a phase shift where as there isn't any with a PI in the off period. (if you are seeing a phase shift in the off period, please show me this phase shift)


Guys like you and Davor are only belittling the science when you belittle others but offer no substantiation for your claims. Nobody on this forum has ever proposed a method to achieve GB in a pi design except the SD2000, GS4 and TDI until you, Aziz, made your claim re using X and R to solve the problem.


Davor, you have given your support to Aziz. Are you stating you know Aziz's method or are you just being disruptive?? Do you give credence to his statement that he combines X & R to achieve GB with PI?

[Aziz]

As we are only talking about ground balance then I assume you mean ground S (Signal)= ground R + X???


If so then, in the frequency domain, we mix ground X & R to achieve ground balance. In other words we subtract the amplitude from the phase shift to achieve a null but it isn't possible to achieve GB and discriminate using the same mix of X and R so we use another channel and filters to discriminate.


The time domain is different though, the phase shift in vlf now becomes magnetic viscosity and there is no X component if we sample after the spike so I ask you again how do you use X to cancel a magnetic viscosity signal that contains no X component?

NOTE...how do you use X to cancel a magnetic viscosity signal that contains no X component?

(Note, this is a test.) lol

Hey UFox, why don't you give up? You and your friends don't deserve the WBGB technology.

[IBGold]

YES BRUCE.

[satdaveuk]

Ive been following this thread when time permits and not commenting because its out my depth half the time, reading the threads is interesting because you clever engineers are thrashing out your knowledge and views to try and come to a decisive answer to mathmatical theorys in the formats of metal detecting here in the mid 2000 centrury.
Do you think This forum should have really been called( Field test ) should have been called Back to the drawing board.
If you were field testing you would have all built the project by now or at least part and doing proper field testing ie: out in the real world, so in my way of thinking lableing this thread field test was very much premature, However still very interesting and keep up the good work.
Warm regards

[UrbanFox]

even that one is a fallacy

You troll litter really have no clue.

Keep romancing Davor. Wake me up when you realise what you have not got.

[Davor]

even that one is a fallacy

You troll litter really have no clue.

[UrbanFox]

Offers nothing of consequence...

So you don't have a clue, and would like to divert attention away from this fact with waffle!!!

[Davor]

Are you up to explaining ...

Depends on a person. It obviously does not work on trolls
You passed on a perfectly self-explanatory rhetorical question that obviously failed to unfold it's self-contained answer on you. See, you have no capacity to understand, so stop trying. That small area below hairdo may start hurting you.

[UrbanFox]

Hey UFox,
what would you like to do: S = R+X
Detecting R in signal S (and remove X) or
detecting X in signal S and remove X to get R?
Why would you do which?

(Note, this is a test.)

As we are only talking about ground balance then I assume you mean ground S (Signal)= ground R + X???


If so then, in the frequency domain, we mix ground X & R to achieve ground balance. In other words we subtract the amplitude from the phase shift to achieve a null but it isn't possible to achieve GB and discriminate using the same mix of X and R so we use another channel and filters to discriminate.


The time domain is different though, the phase shift in vlf now becomes magnetic viscosity and there is no X component if we sample after the spike so I ask you again how do you use X to cancel a magnetic viscosity signal that contains no X component?

NOTE...how do you use X to cancel a magnetic viscosity signal that contains no X component?

(Note, this is a test.) lol

[Aziz]

Are you up to explaining how you are going to make this PI GB work using X and R components taken from the TX spike?

Hey UFox,
what would you like to do: S = R+X
Detecting R in signal S (and remove X) or
detecting X in signal S and remove X to get R?
Why would you do which?

(Note, this is a test.)

[UrbanFox]

Read woman!It is all in the coil. Seek and ye shall find.

Are you up to explaining how you are going to make this PI GB work using X and R components taken from the TX spike?

[Davor]

Read woman!

there is no X component and there is no phase shift during the off period.

It is all in the coil. Seek and ye shall find.