This is not just an RL circuit, it's an RLC circuit. In fact, it's an R(r)LC circuit, like this:
The resistance of the coil (r) contributes to the Q of the coil itself like this:

so in this case, a smaller r yields a higher Q. But this isn't the R that is driving the coil. If you assume r=0 (ideal wire) then what we are left with is a Thevenin equivalent parallel RLC circuit:
The Q for this is exactly the inverse:

so a large R increases the Q. You can easily see this by trying 1k, 10k, 100k, and 1M resistors. All give about the same answer but higher values make the peak more abrupt and easier to zero in on. I find 1M to make things overly sensitive to connection quality so I tend to stick with 100k.
Sorry, I had not watched Woody's video, it appears to be wrong. His result of 2.58MHz certainly suggests wrong.
The resistance of the coil (r) contributes to the Q of the coil itself like this:
so in this case, a smaller r yields a higher Q. But this isn't the R that is driving the coil. If you assume r=0 (ideal wire) then what we are left with is a Thevenin equivalent parallel RLC circuit:
The Q for this is exactly the inverse:
so a large R increases the Q. You can easily see this by trying 1k, 10k, 100k, and 1M resistors. All give about the same answer but higher values make the peak more abrupt and easier to zero in on. I find 1M to make things overly sensitive to connection quality so I tend to stick with 100k.
Sorry, I had not watched Woody's video, it appears to be wrong. His result of 2.58MHz certainly suggests wrong.

Comment