Originally posted by ashkelon
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Full m/lab SD2000 schematics
Collapse
X
-
GUYS DO NOT ASK ME ON SD2000 -!
I WILL NOT ANSWER ON YOUR REQUESTS IN MY ADDRESS -!
I AM NOT INTERESTED IN SD2000 JUST CAUSE I DO NOT SEE FULL DATA - FULL SCHEMATICS, FULL ORIGINAL LAYOUTS,
FULL PART LIST, FULL O-SCOPE DIAGRAMMS.
SD2000 WAS AND IS TERRA INCOGNITO. I DO NOT DO THAT IS KNOWN ON HALF. I DO ONLY FULL PROJECTS -!
Leave a comment:
-
Mick,
Thanks for posting the diagram.
Here's another I found some where, maybe here?Attached Files
Leave a comment:
-
As promised, how to use a 797 if you want to leave out the lm394.
I'm still not convinced that the 797 is quieter though, but I still have more experiments to do...
Cheers MickAttached Files
Leave a comment:
-
Ad797can be used to replace the lm394 and the first ne5534. I will dig up a schematic for that later on. It will be much better than attempting to find a good pair of transistors.
Aziz once did did a bunch of different transistor comparisons, I don't remember if it was here or elsewhere though.
cheers Mick
Leave a comment:
-
Try some low Rbb types. BC337 has Rbb about 30 ohms, and yet it is still quite fast. Noise figure is directly related to Rbb, as it is added to the source resistance. Some other transistors have even lower Rbb, say BD135, but tend to be slower. Even those may be "convinced" to co-operate, but not in a configuration you need.
You'll seldom find Rbb in datasheets, so unless someone else measured it, you are in the dark. BC547 to BC549 have roughly an order of magnitude higher Rbb, and thus it is best to avoid them. These were measured by a fellow at DIY Audio (Ic=2mA, Vce=2V):
Code:Type Mfr Prod. year Ree Rbb BC549C Phil 1980 0.85 430 BC550C Phil ~2000 0.72 234 BC550 Siem ~1995 0.98 247 BC550B MultiC ~2000 0.57 >650 BC550C Moto 1998 0.43 73 BC550 NS 1995 0.29 62 BC439 Hita ~1980 0.71 >650
Leave a comment:
-
Hi friends. The instead lm394. I want to use instead bc547 or 2N3906. Is it working?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: