Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

TESORO GOLDEN SABRE

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ivconic
    replied
    " ...Is there a possibility that when even the nulling seems fine , the sensitivity is poor ?..."

    "Nulling seems fine" but you must understand that coils nulled well on one frequency are not nulled well on another (different) frequency. Residual voltage rised if frequency changed.

    I think Qiaozhi already gave here good hint. Keep RX coil resonance within +1.8 - +2kHz than TX coil.
    And use pp caps.

    BTW thank You very much on your effort making those clips!
    Best Regards!

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    Off resonance:

    TX = 6mH + 20nF = 14.53kHz
    or.......... + 22nF = 13.85kHz
    RX = 6.5mH + 15nF = 16.12kHz

    1.59kHz or 2.27kHz off resonance....

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    " ..Nulling on pin6 input LF353 (coil connected to pcb to compare with firdt video):
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyK02Zk1PLY ..
    "

    I guess those "notches" (kind a distortion in sinus) are caused by bad quality of RX cap ?
    Because i usually have there perfect sinus without any distortions...

    I am using PP caps at TX and RX whenever i can find proper ones.

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    Originally posted by Qiaozhi View Post
    I'm not going to say, "told you so".

    Looking at the values for your coils and the tuning caps used, I have calculated your TX frequency to be 14.5KHz, which you have confirmed is correct. However, your RX circuit is tuned to 19.7KHz, which in my opinion is too high, as Tesoro circuits are usually off resonance by around 9%. In this case you should be using a calculated capacitor value of 15.5nF to tune the RX to 15.8KHz. I would suggest trying a 15nF cap instead of the 10nF and see if there is any improvement.
    Very nice calculator here!

    Leave a comment:


  • porkluvr
    replied
    Darn, Qiaozhi. You beat me to it.

    LTspice shows almost 3x increase in received signal voltage by changing to 15n, with a 6.53mH receiver coil.

    Sorry about the wild goose chase, Dennis.

    Leave a comment:


  • Qiaozhi
    replied
    Originally posted by Dennis the Mennis View Post
    Originally posted by Qiaozhi View Post
    It is unlikely that the low sensitivity is caused by using ceramic capacitors throughout the design. Polyester caps would be preferred in the TX and RX circuits, but not essential. Ceramic caps are best for coupling, decoupling and filtering.If you change the TX and RX caps for polyester types, I doubt you will notice any difference.

    Hi Qiaozhi ,

    I guess you were right ...(?)

    regards

    Dennis the Mennis
    I'm not going to say, "told you so".

    Looking at the values for your coils and the tuning caps used, I have calculated your TX frequency to be 14.5KHz, which you have confirmed is correct. However, your RX circuit is tuned to 19.7KHz, which in my opinion is too high, as Tesoro circuits are usually off resonance by around 9%. In this case you should be using a calculated capacitor value of 15.5nF to tune the RX to 15.8KHz. I would suggest trying a 15nF cap instead of the 10nF and see if there is any improvement.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dennis the Mennis
    replied
    [quote=Qiaozhi;102430]It is unlikely that the low sensitivity is caused by using ceramic capacitors throughout the design. Polyester caps would be preferred in the TX and RX circuits, but not essential. Ceramic caps are best for coupling, decoupling and filtering.If you change the TX and RX caps for polyester types, I doubt you will notice any difference.

    Hi Qiaozhi ,

    I guess you were right ...(?)

    regards

    Dennis the Mennis

    Leave a comment:


  • Dennis the Mennis
    replied
    . . . _ _ _ . . .

    Originally posted by ivconic View Post
    ???
    That seems strange. Usually, when all done properly , TGSL should detect 1e coin easily at 31-32cm distance in air (Disc mode, Sense to max, no chatters, ferrite rod 10cm long totaly rejected)..
    Be sure that you used LF353, 2x LM308, etc...etc... TX transistor can be 2N2907 or BC327 (many other similar too).
    Negative voltage can varry from -6.00 to -6.30V.
    ???
    Strange!?
    I only got low distances with not so good nulled coil so far. Doubt in coil remains in your case too.
    What about ferrite? Take 10cm long ferrite rod and check if it is fully rejected up to 5cm away from coil surface.. Than check with some small and thin silver coin is it accepted at the same adjustments when ferrite rod is rejected... Inform us here.
    Cheers!
    Hi ,

    I've changed my ceramic caps into the polyester caps but the problem still remains : poor detection distance - max 15 cm on a 2 euro coin ...
    I've bought , as you mentioned , a 10 cm ferrite rod and it was totaly rejected : poor detection distance.
    Changed the BF245C into B type , no progess ( only Tx voltage dropped so changed it back ).
    Used LF353 , LM308 ( even tried TL 081 )2N2907 etc everything according
    original.

    Max suggested to make another set of DD 25cm coils : problem remains.
    The coils are for TX 6,08 mH / 21,7 ohm / 94 windings and for Rx 6,53 mH / 22,8 ohm / 101 windings of AWG 30.( L values according the multimeter and given the values they should be reasonably )
    The coils are constrained , shielded , with airgap , correct shielded cable used , ground Rx in search head , isolated in overlap points ...

    I've tried to gain the same images as shown on page 57 posted by Max and used these as a lead , I don't know where else to start.
    Used in Tx 4,7 nF // 15nF to reach 14,5 Khz and for Rx only 10nF.

    scoop image attached of :
    - TX - nulling signal direct on Rx leads ( not connected to pcb)
    - Tx
    - Coils
    - Testpoint Schematic for videos

    Please find here link for video showing :

    Nulling direct on coil (pcb disconnected):


    Nulling on TP2 (see testpoint image attached) :


    Nulling on pin6 input LF353 (coil connected to pcb to compare with firdt video):


    Nulling on TP4 ( the influence (?) of nulling on DISC LEVEL):
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xg615rcykg8

    DISC potmeter from CounterWise to CounterClockWise on TP4 :


    Nulling on TP5 (the influence(?) of nulling on GroundBalance):
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pn--c863r1k

    GEB potmeter from CW to CCW :


    Nulling on TP6 switch in ALL METAL position:


    Nulling on TP6 switch in DISC position:


    DISC potmeter from CW to CCW on TP 6 switch in DISC pos :


    Nulling on TP7 ( the influence (?) of nulling on GEB ):


    GEB potmeter from CW to CCW on TP7:


    TP8 ferrite rod rejected :


    TP8 detecting 2 euro coin at max 15 cm :


    TP10 detecting 2 euro coin at max 15 cm , >20 cm no response :



    Is there a possibility that when even the nulling seems fine , the sensitivity is poor ?
    So coil related problem)

    Anyone any suggestions what could relate to this problem of the poor detecting depth ( in air) ?

    I've payed most attention on detection in ALL METAL mode , didn't experiment much (yet) in other modes.

    Is this a example that nulling isn't only about residual voltage but perhaps most important the influence of the phase shift on serveral testpoints?

    When nulling on scoop 30mV is on MultiMeter 000.0 mV
    " " 80mV is on MultiMeter 1mV
    The residual voltage mentioned in serveral post ( 4 -12 mV depending on type MM) is pretty high with scoop measured direct on coil ?




    regards Dennis the Mennis
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • adem
    replied
    thanks IVCONIC

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    Originally posted by adem View Post
    Which of homemade tesoro detector is the best? If you can, sort from worst to best

    Tesoro LOBO?
    Tesoro Eldorado?
    Tesoro Golden Sabre?
    Tesoro Silver Sabre?
    Tesoro Royal Sabre?
    Tesoro Bandido 2?
    Tessoro Bandido II uMax?

    Thank you for your time...

    P.s. Sorry for my English, I from Lithuania ...

    For me....TGSL and Eldorado are best. Bandido is also good, but to make it right you have to find original opamps. I tried with substitutions and it is not working so good.
    Silver Sabre...hmmm....i make 3 so far but only one is working very good. At other 2 devices i have stabillity issues which i couldn't solve fast so i abandoned them (i am not used to scratch my head much ).
    Royal is very simillar to TGSL and Eldorado...i didn't want to make it.
    Lobo...i never made it but it is interesting to me. Maybe i will make it in future.

    Leave a comment:


  • adem
    replied
    Which of homemade tesoro detector is the best? If you can, sort from worst to best

    Tesoro LOBO?
    Tesoro Eldorado?
    Tesoro Golden Sabre?
    Tesoro Silver Sabre?
    Tesoro Royal Sabre?
    Tesoro Bandido 2?
    Tessoro Bandido II uMax?

    Thank you for your time...

    P.s. Sorry for my English, I from Lithuania ...

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • detectoman
    replied
    for all is risk and is very suspicious what woman, interest for this hobby, and can contact rich treasures members, and after make fraudulent transactions whit lies, y say for the existent tricks of internet, have ever caution in these, may be are mens
    hot warm lady go to purchase any new mineoro detector, large range

    Leave a comment:


  • WM6
    replied
    Originally posted by hot lady View Post

    But where???
    Maybe here:

    Leave a comment:


  • hot lady
    replied
    MD

    thanks IVCONIC

    But where???

    thanks too moch

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X