RX is always for 0.5mH more inductance than TX.
Second, with the Tesoro models, the two capacitors in the oscillator always define the frequency factor.
They are mostly rounded values: 223+224, 333+334 or 473+474.
And because of that, it was shown and proven to me that it is best to wind the TX between 5.6-5.8mH and the RX between 6.2-6.3mH.
Of course, different inductances will work, but then fine-tuning the capacitance is an additional effort.
For the sake of easier balancing of the coils, it is preferable to always keep a difference of 0.5mH inductance between RX and TX.
Another thing that makes it easier to balance the coils correctly is the geometry of the TX and RX coils.
I think I strictly mentioned this once upon a time because it makes life a lot easier for hobbyists.
The geometry published by Artyom is "crueler" and it will be easier to balance if both "D" halves have a "belly" towards the middle.
In other words; if instead of flat sides towards the middle both "D" halves are elliptical.
How will this affect the performance of such a coil?
Balancing will be 50% easier to do, and the coil will lose about 10-30% in the width of the "focus" of detection.
That is, the "focus" will be narrower and shorter.
If the hobbyist has the conditions for machine winding coils; then a better choice is the geometry that Artyom posted, of course.
â
Leave a comment: