Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IDX-PRO+VDI

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • szucs_g
    replied
    Originally posted by eduardo1979 View Post
    The 2 tones depend on the configuration of discrimination, as in the MXT.
    I thought so. In the event that a larger iron objects of the search indicates that even the voice screaming like finding a dime?


    What indicates VDI at this time? Larger iron objects, appropriate displays?

    Leave a comment:


  • eduardo1979
    replied
    The 2 tones depend on the configuration of discrimination, as in the MXT.

    Leave a comment:


  • szucs_g
    replied
    From IDX manual: "Some large trash metals, such as pieces of lead, pot metal, aluminium or tin will produce a good sound regardless of the DISC control position."

    OK. This function is not false. :-)

    The major metals in solution "2tones" what sound? The sound of the metal material, or characteristic depends of the DISC on the setting?

    Leave a comment:


  • woodbob123
    replied
    just my luck offered a cheap coil and it's the wrong one Thanks silverdog

    Leave a comment:


  • silverdog
    replied
    I believe you need a coil made for the Whites XLT

    Leave a comment:


  • woodbob123
    replied
    could i use a 950 black eclipse coil for mxt/m6 on the IDX
    if not which coil should i look for.

    Leave a comment:


  • szucs_g
    replied
    Yesterday I tried the metal detectors. Heavily contaminated with metals in the yard. Air selects the iron well, but all rusty junk in the ground screaming. The GEB function based on the instructions mentioned earlier, I could not adjust. What is wrong?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sun_rise_pt
    replied
    I'd like to know the changes introduced by Mr. Bill in IDX Pro. Anyone have info on this?

    I also see that there are videos on youtube reporting high sensitivity in this circuit (a coin over 40cm!!!)... ...but after building a PCB, following the scheme accurately, I note that the results are much lower.

    Someone who has done one of these units with greater sensitivity, may be sharing the work with us?

    Leave a comment:


  • satdaveuk
    replied
    Nice job Tepco

    Has any of you folk done anything with the PIC30F4012 got two in stock love to find a use for them

    Regards

    Leave a comment:


  • juice2839
    replied
    Very Nice Tepco. Be cool if you could make one pcb the used either the 16f690 or the 16f88. Maybe with some jumpers. I might play around with Eagle.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tepco
    replied
    “Display sized” PCB for VDI (16F690 version), standard components
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • mikebg
    replied
    Originally posted by joop View Post
    Been following your posts, mikeBG. You have some interesting observations! I am trying to understand the IDX-pro TX and RX circuit with the help of LTSPICE...

    The ultimate test would of course be a side by side comparison in the field of the standard IDX and your frontend. Will it be more sensitive?
    Joop, it will be less sensitive to modulation of AIR&GND signal. I'm waiting you to show your SPICE analysis of TX.
    The SPICE circuit should simulate amplitude modulation of TX, which is very important problem for metal detectors. The TX modulation is caused by:
    1. Change of ground conductivity (resistivity). For this purpose, the SPICE circuit in my post #656 has an induction coupled loop (transformer T1) containing a resistor which value changes between 1k and 1M when TX coil passes over ground with different properties.
    2. Change of coil height (distance from ground). Coupling coefficient k of transformer T1 changes in SPICE circuit when the operator changes the height of TX coil.
    3. Change of TX supply voltage. In my SPICE circut this is shown as battery discharge, but this is not important process because the change happens very slowly. However there are quick changes of TX supply voltage caused by battery load. For example, if we have an audio circuit powered by the same battery as TX circuit, the TX supply voltage changes when loudspeaker beeps. We have a problem if this causes modulation of TX field because the demodulator sees the modulation of AIR signal.
    My above SPICE TX circuit also generates the effect of variable battery load because supply current increases when TX coil passes over more absorbing ground. Note that in post #656 resistor R5 is connected to battery voltage. The modulation by change of battery load is avoided in the attached here SPICE diagram because R5 is connected to a 8V constant reference voltage.
    The modulation of AIR signal appears as an interference, which the operator can not eliminate with GND knob. Let calculate for what small modulation index m_i of TX field we speak?
    Without TGT signal, in RX input we have for example an AIR signal 10mV. A deep buried or small target generates TGT signal 1uV. The TGT signal appears as modulation of AIR signal with an index m_i = 1uV/10mV=0.0001. To detect TGT with such small index, the movement of TX coil should cause modulation of AIR signal with an order less than TGT signal, ie weshould achieve index m_i<0.00001.
    To increase sensitivity of metal detector, the circit should:
    1. Suppress amplitude modulation of TX. That means TX circuit should contain an automatic controller to maintain constant current amplitude in TX coil.
    2. Balance the AIR signal in RX input. This can be made with an ABC - automatic balance control, which slowly eliminates all signals in input of preamp.
    3. Suppress the GND signal in RX input. This can be made with TWIN LOOP RX coil configuration. Two RX coils in opposite direction can also suppress all interferences generated by remote sources because signals are subtracted.
    4. Increase the amplification of preamp near to saturation in output. This can be made with AGC (automatic gain control) widely used in radio receivers.
    Here is the TX circuit with increased power.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • szucs_g
    replied
    Kidding aside. If I reset once a ferrite rod of the GEB, then do not have to be? Do not have to remove a potentiometer on the box?

    Leave a comment:


  • szucs_g
    replied
    Originally posted by joop View Post
    I am not familiar with the IDX-PRO, but the procedure for setting the GEB potentiometer might be the same as for the TGSL:



    Regards,
    Joop
    Thank You! Hvala! Köszönöm! Cpocibo! Muchas gracias!
    This means that a toroidal ferrite is to pack myself. :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • joop
    replied
    I am not familiar with the IDX-PRO, but the procedure for setting the GEB potentiometer might be the same as for the TGSL:

    For this, you will need a small ferrite slug scavenged from an old radio or possibly a toroid. Verifying correct circuit operation would very difficult without a ferrite slug! Start with the TGSL switched to the all metal mode and set the GB pot fully Counter Clockwise. Start waving the ferrite slug over the coil and advance that GB pot slowly Clockwise until the ferrite slug is rejected or the sound starts to break up. Advancing too much further and silver may be rejected in the DISC mode! This will be a good place to start for
    rejecting the return signal associated with ground.
    Regards,
    Joop

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X