Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

QED

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ivconic
    replied
    Originally posted by Aziz View Post
    Hi Ivconic,

    I'm addressing other people in other forums (mainly Australian). The dispute is going on for many years. They have spread many lies and wrong info. Just to push the market leader (ml) and discourage other developers in the art.

    Cheers,
    Aziz
    So! Than go there and tell them that in their faces.
    I would like to see here more technical debate on posted schematic.
    Man shared schematic and now is up to us whether we gonna learn something from it or not.
    ...
    Looking at few posted videos i can't resist against "Minelab behavior" impression that i have watching those. Maybe a clue?

    Leave a comment:


  • Aziz
    replied
    Originally posted by ivconic View Post
    Aziz am i wrong or you are addressing that to some people from this forum?
    I don't recall that anybody here ever questioned possibillity of QED!
    All i recall is huge pile of BS posted month by month here on several threads by very few and very same part-time forum experts.
    So... let me see; seems somebody else did a job and now usual forum rats exult on that here!
    In manner: " I told ya...i told ya..." !
    Instead of exult - those rats better to offer something material or shut up for good.
    The rest of forum members are very tired to see everyday BS repeating day by day here.
    Hi Ivconic,

    I'm addressing other people in other forums (mainly Australian). The dispute is going on for many years. They have spread many lies and wrong info. Just to push the market leader (ml) and discourage other developers in the art.

    Cheers,
    Aziz

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    Aziz am i wrong or you are addressing that to some people from this forum?
    I don't recall that anybody here ever questioned possibillity of QED!
    All i recall is huge pile of BS posted month by month here on several threads by very few and very same part-time forum experts.
    So... let me see; seems somebody else did a job and now usual forum rats exult on that here!
    In manner: " I told ya...i told ya..." !
    Instead of exult - those rats better to offer something material or shut up for good.
    The rest of forum members are very tired to see BS repeating day by day here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aziz
    replied
    *LOL*
    To me, the QED has shown it, that it is possible (I would say, Q.E.D.!)
    Quite Easy Done as well!

    Why the f$k'in h$ll it's so quiet now. Where are the gurus from the other (dark) side of the power? Don't forget to thank to the smart guys PJ, R_H, Bushfox, et. al. They have made it possible.
    Thank you very much guys.


    Cheers,
    Aziz

    Leave a comment:


  • ivconic
    replied
    More i read this thread - more it reminds me on some LRL threads from the past.
    C'mon folks; man gave here schematic and certain claims, so?
    If you are technical enough: than put your analyzes here on it.
    If you are not... than shut your pieholes!
    We can't analyze what's going on in those uPc's because we don't have a code, yet
    we can analyze analogue parts.
    As incompetent in such matters; i would remain silent and wait main forum experts here to do the analyze for the rest of us.
    Or...? Or you just enjoy posting plain and shoal thoughts of yours!?

    Leave a comment:


  • Aziz
    replied
    Originally posted by detecto View Post
    LOL too much PANIC abouth one detector
    bugwhiskers congratulations for successful project !!!! Good luck!!!
    Cheers
    Detecto
    *LOL*
    It's the bursting of a dam effect. We will see a lot of good performing detectors later. Many freaks can read the essentials of the published schematics. And the market leader can't do it better either.

    Aziz

    Leave a comment:


  • Aziz
    replied
    Originally posted by sawmill View Post
    Aziz

    How many ML or any other company beating detectors have
    you produced? None you say, well so much for your opinion about
    the schematics.

    If no one has produced such a machine ,how would they know
    that the schematics ,would be that good? I bet that every detector
    designer has produced schematics ,and thought they had a world
    beater design,only to have it flop when tested.
    Sawmill, sawmill, our lost son.

    You are purely disappointed & upset, that the QED hasn't been available to you, when you need it. It isn't our fault, if the "World's best metal detector" did not work at your location.
    And there weren't any release date of the QED and it required extensive testing too. You knew it.

    BTW, I have made hundreds of schematics (& built them). I know my stuff.
    Aziz

    Leave a comment:


  • detecto
    replied
    LOL too much PANIC abouth one detector
    bugwhiskers congratulations for successful project !!!! Good luck!!!
    Cheers
    Detecto

    Leave a comment:


  • Carl-NC
    replied
    Yer right... PJ, please don't post baseless derogatory comments about the QED. If you see something wrong, then spit it out in detail, or don't spit at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • bugwhiskers
    replied
    Originally posted by Carl-NC View Post
    Yup, PJ did the hijacking, he's the guilty one. Perhaps his claim about harmonics is utter nonsense. Do you feel an overwhelming need to respond to every criticism? Heck man, you'll need a thicker skin in this game! I'll guess that PJ just made that up, and is getting exactly what he wants out of the deal.

    You got it in one.
    Perhaps you could remind him about the "product bashing" rule. If he doesn't like the QED or the delay he can go and purchase whatever he wants.

    Leave a comment:


  • Carl-NC
    replied
    Originally posted by detecto View Post
    Never mind :P
    BTW who build QED and what Q-E-D mean?
    The QED is designed by Bugwhiskers from Australia. QED stands for "quod erat demonstrandum" (Latin), which means "that which was to be demonstrated". It is usually placed at the end of a mathematical proof. In college, we used to say it meant "Quite Easily Done," which could apply equally to a Minelab-beating detector, eh?

    Leave a comment:


  • dougAEGPF
    replied
    Originally posted by sawmill View Post
    Aziz
    I bet that every detector designer has produced schematics ,and thought they had a world
    beater design,only to have it flop when tested.
    The QED has NOT flopped when tested!!!
    dougAEGPF

    Leave a comment:


  • Carl-NC
    replied
    Originally posted by dougAEGPF View Post
    The imputation was that the QED has not found gold.I was merely correcting this misinformation!!!!!
    dougAEGPF
    Doug, do you feel an overwhelming need to respond to every criticism?

    Leave a comment:


  • Carl-NC
    replied
    Originally posted by bugwhiskers View Post
    Civility is not a problem.
    Product bashing by the likes of Patches Junior and his ridiculous claim that "four layer boards cause harmonics" which later morphed into the QED having harmonic problems add nothing to his credibility. His refusal to supply credible proof and persistance shows that his sole purpose is to disrupt this thread with utter nonsense.
    Please keep in mind that he was the one that highjacked Aziz's thread.
    Yup, PJ did the hijacking, he's the guilty one. Perhaps his claim about harmonics is utter nonsense. Do you feel an overwhelming need to respond to every criticism? Heck man, you'll need a thicker skin in this game! I'll guess that PJ just made that up, and is getting exactly what he wants out of the deal.

    Leave a comment:


  • dougAEGPF
    replied
    Originally posted by Carl-NC View Post
    Doug, re-read #140. Stuff like this is for braggarts, and if all ya want to do is brag, then you got the stuff! Heck, I'll brag too... the White's Prizm 3 done found gold, I seen it with my own eyes!
    The imputation was that the QED has not found gold.I was merely correcting this misinformation!!!!!
    dougAEGPF

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X