field test unit no 001 "model T"

[sido]

[QUOTE=Aziz;190121]Please ignore Sid completely. Yet once again! (see #1077, #1078 )
He doesn't really contribute to this thread.
/QUOTE]

How can I....Dohhhh

Sid

[Aziz]

Please explain, this is what I mean....What fuel to the fire??

Aziz c'mon, Do what ever you are allowed too do so. If you are given the right to fuel some fire on the this forum....well let's just leave it at that.

Sid

Hey Sid,

no worries mate. It's only a nice teasing game of the forum-trolls. They just motivate us. As always.

BTW, if you want to see the outcome of the hot discussion, then go to the Doug's site.
All the calculated coil results were published there.
The outcome is really insane and will lead to new outperforming PI coils.
Cheers,
^sif

[sido]

He doesn't really contribute to this thread.
And he isn't able to see the whole relevant picture.

Contribute to WHAT??.... I am reminding you that it has become un-pleasant....

What is the whole PICTURE?

Sid

[sido]

And he isn't able to see the whole relevant picture.

Go on with adding more fuel to the fire.

Please explain, this is what I mean....What fuel to the fire??

Aziz c'mon, Do what ever you are allowed too do so. If you are given the right to fuel some fire on the this forum....well let's just leave it at that.

Sid

[Aziz]

Please ignore Sid completely. Yet once again! (see #1077, #1078 )
He doesn't really contribute to this thread.
And he isn't able to see the whole relevant picture.

Go on with adding more fuel to the fire.
I have still lot's of tar & feather.

^sif

[sido]

No please!

As a result, we will have high performance & cheap PI coils soon (a ML beating coil).

Please add more fuel to the fire.
^sif

For all....Why does it ALWAYS have to be referred to a Minelab beating coil?

Aziz, I do respect you to some point from your past honest contributions (slowly fading though),
But dont you think recently you have totally gone off topic?

Everyone here is to learn, not to listen too how your life may be treating you.

Posting in the off topic section may be a better option for you as a suggestion if something not detector related is bothering you..

Not trying to have a go at you, just frustrated with the irrelevant comments which is making the Geotech experience very un-welcomed and un-pleasant.

Sid

[Aziz]

I agree.
Please, please give it a rest.

Everyone is tired of the same old rhetoric. You've all made your point, and now it's time to move on.
If you don't have something technically useful to add to the discussion, then please don't post. Silence is golden.

No please!
The forum-trolls have helped (motivated) to find the answers to the very interesting question.
As a result, we will have high performance & cheap PI coils soon (a ML beating coil).

Please add more fuel to the fire.
^sif

[Aziz]

I dare say the Aziz's simulations do not show actual use a a real coil in use. So the air gap would not show on the computer simulations. But I hope that someday Aziz will actually build a "real" coil and show how good it works on real ground.

Wrong again. Want some tar & feather?

[Aziz]

Aziz a question for you please.

Thank you for the coil comparison modelling you did.
I was wondering though if inductance leakage around the air spaces in the basket/spider weave was taken into account in your modelling?
I believe it could be a significant factor in field density at distance?

Cheers

Yes, it has been taken into account.

[PATCHES JUNIOR]

Aziz a question for you please.

Thank you for the coil comparison modelling you did.
I was wondering though if inductance leakage around the air spaces in the basket/spider weave was taken into account in your modelling?
I believe it could be a significant factor in field density at distance?

Cheers

I dare say the Aziz's simulations do not show actual use a a real coil in use. So the air gap would not show on the computer simulations. But I hope that someday Aziz will actually build a "real" coil and show how good it works on real ground.

[Kev]

Aziz a question for you please.

Thank you for the coil comparison modelling you did.
I was wondering though if inductance leakage around the air spaces in the basket/spider weave was taken into account in your modelling?
I believe it could be a significant factor in field density at distance?

Cheers

[Qiaozhi]

This does not seem to go anywhere...
Doug, you have all my sympathies, but you certainly must have more important things to do, other than jumping whenever a troll pulls your leg.

I agree.
Please, please give it a rest.

Everyone is tired of the same old rhetoric. You've all made your point, and now it's time to move on.
If you don't have something technically useful to add to the discussion, then please don't post. Silence is golden.

[Davor]

This does not seem to go anywhere...
Doug, you have all my sympathies, but you certainly must have more important things to do, other than jumping whenever a troll pulls your leg.

[Doug2]

Your so funny Doug. Can I post some of your quotes about your thoughts on Carl and this forum that say different?

Unlike you I post my comments in public domain! You are too scared to allow ANY of your "forum" to be in the public domain and I can see why!

No wonder you are scared! No wonder you are ashamed! No wonder one of your members is now a whistle blower!

[PATCHES JUNIOR]

I can post on all the forums that really matter like this one!

Your so funny Doug. Can I post some of your quotes about your thoughts on Carl and this forum that say different?