Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Vallon VMH3CS Mine Detector

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lytle78
    replied
    I have a couple of the “Polish” ones on the way. So far, it looks like that might be the end of the line for the last of the current batch of Afghanistan surplus unit - the Poles seem to be sold out as do the UK sellers.

    Anyway, it will be interesting to see what they can do - assuming that they function properly.

    I have used ML SD2100, GPC2300, Garrett ATX, Whites TDI and DFPI and have some idea of what to compare it to.

    Rick Kempf - Gold Canyon AZ - where there is no gold.

    Leave a comment:


  • jarrett
    replied
    Thank You Sir,
    Will take a read of those mentioned.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ferric Toes
    replied
    Originally posted by jarrett View Post
    Good Evening all,
    I have recently purchased a Vallon dated 2010 with the obligatory broken armrest and are in the process of converting a pair of ear defenders to headphones using a pair of piezo sounders but am not sure what type to get be it active or passive or how to wire them either series or paralell and wondered if anyone knew, i found that the audio plug from British military radio series called Larkspur is the same orientation as used on the Vallon so may be available to our Canadian/Australian members, as well as UK, i did note commercial plugs are available but being a cheapskate took this route although i did have a plug knocking about
    Hi Jarrett,
    Sorry about the delay in answering, and welcome to this thread. Firstly have a look at pages 465, 672, 707, 769, where you will find some information about audio mods for the Vallon. If you want to run standard low impedance headphones, the transformer mentioned is available on eBay. Any further questions, please ask on this forum thread, or send me a PM.

    Eric.

    Leave a comment:


  • jarrett
    replied
    Good Evening all,
    I have recently purchased a Vallon dated 2010 with the obligatory broken armrest and are in the process of converting a pair of ear defenders to headphones using a pair of piezo sounders but am not sure what type to get be it active or passive or how to wire them either series or paralell and wondered if anyone knew, i found that the audio plug from British military radio series called Larkspur is the same orientation as used on the Vallon so may be available to our Canadian/Australian members, as well as UK, i did note commercial plugs are available but being a cheapskate took this route although i did have a plug knocking about

    Leave a comment:


  • MTammet
    replied
    I use helical wound 5mm copper tape with conducting adhesive and soldered wire lead. No overlapping.

    Measurements:

    5x6 rectangular teflon 7/0.22 1.14 mH added 1ohm resistor at connector 3.6 ohm supper quiet rg58
    4 inch round enameled 0.4 0.8 mH added 1ohmresistor to get 3 ohm noisy, but works rg58
    10 1/2 inch round teflon 7/0.22 1.26 mH 3.3 ohm rg58
    12 inch rectangular 7/0.22 1.56 3.6 ohm rg58
    15 inch round 7/0.22 1.36 3.3 ohm rg58

    Measurements without factory cable in Vallon. I use original Vallon. 2008 Vallon will work with all custom coils. 2009 I have will not work with 10 inch and 15 inch.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	coilsvallon.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	747.4 KB
ID:	352573

    Leave a comment:


  • Qiaozhi
    replied
    I suppose one way to resolve the question would be to construct two separate coils that are identical in shape and size to the Vallon coil, but with one wound with tinned copper mesh, and the other with woven copper (or nickel plated copper) fabric tape. If there's a difference, then the shielding material is the issue. If not, then the discrepancy is caused by something else.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ferric Toes
    replied
    Regarding the Vallon coil, in my view the construction is not the best. The tinned copper mesh screen appears to be helically wound directly on the coil bundle without any insulating wrapping material. If there is, then it is very thin. On a few Vallon coils, I have noticed that the detector sounds off if the coil is twisted. This indicates that the mesh tightens up and its conductivity is therefore increased so that it gives a detectable eddy current response. I presume that there is a gap in the mesh to prevent the shorted turn effect.

    A quick test with the 7" coil and a 3" x 1" piece of mesh demonstrated that it gives no signal when loose, but when pulled tight gives a strong signal, particularly at the coil edge over the winding. Because of this borderline conductivity at short delays, it might have some additional damping effect on the TX switch off waveform. Could this result in the non-detection of the 1" x 1" foil with the Vallon coil?

    This situation does not arise with the conductive fabric tape.

    Eric

    Leave a comment:


  • KingJL
    replied
    Originally posted by Ferric Toes View Post
    I decided to test the various coils I have made for the Vallon to see what the spread in resistance, inductance, and resonant frequency is. Coils tested were (1) the stock 6 x 10 inch truncated elliptical that comes with the Vallon. (2) 15 inch, (3) 12 inch, (4) 7 inch, (5) 9 x 4.5 elliptical and (6) the ferrite cored probe.

    Resistance ohms------- Inductance mH------- Resonant f kHz.

    (1) 3.5------------------- 1.473------------------162.06--------- Full length Vallon cable to electronics input.

    (2) 3.9------------------- 1.506------------------207.66---------RG58 coax.

    (3) 3.4------------------- 1.455------------------183.49---------RG58

    (4) 3.2------------------- 1.512------------------174.45---------RG58

    (5) 3.7------------------- 1.435------------------173.97---------RG58 with orange polyurethane outer. (underwater version).

    (6) 4.2------------------- 1.798------------------179.36---------RG58

    The Vallon coil (1) has the lowest resonant frequency and I wonder how important this is. Also, it is the only coil that uses Scotch 24 wire mesh as a shield, as seen in a cross section from a broken coil, whereas all of mine use woven copper, or nickel plated copper, fabric tape. The Vallon also has a long length of coiled thin coax which would add to the capacitance.
    The probe (6) inductance is rather high and it only worked with the addition of 1 ohm in series with the winding. Very stable and low noise pickup as a result.

    The new mystery is that the Vallon coil will not detect a 1" square of kitchen foil anywhere, but my 12" coil does. No great range, but a definite 1" on the coil axis and also signals positive adjacent to the coil edge. It is a true mono and not wound as a dual field as the shell might suggest.

    Eric.
    The specs on my 10 1/4" search coil are: 4.1 ohm, 1.495 mH, 241 kHz resonant freq (including coax), 1 meter Belden 9221 mini coax (75 ohm coax).

    Leave a comment:


  • KingJL
    replied
    Originally posted by Ferric Toes View Post
    "... and also signals positive adjacent to the coil edge...

    Eric."
    I noticed this same effect on my 10 1/4".

    Leave a comment:


  • KingJL
    replied
    Originally posted by green View Post
    (1) calculates 750 ohm Rd, (3) calculates 839 ohm Rd. (pi*L*F res) KingJL schematic reply#1749 has Rd at 800 ohms. Would that difference be enough to cause (1) to not detect the foil?
    Actually it is 820... look on the bottom side of the damp MOSFETs.

    Leave a comment:


  • green
    replied
    Originally posted by Ferric Toes View Post
    I decided to test the various coils I have made for the Vallon to see what the spread in resistance, inductance, and resonant frequency is. Coils tested were (1) the stock 6 x 10 inch truncated elliptical that comes with the Vallon. (2) 15 inch, (3) 12 inch, (4) 7 inch, (5) 9 x 4.5 elliptical and (6) the ferrite cored probe.

    Resistance ohms------- Inductance mH------- Resonant f kHz.

    (1) 3.5------------------- 1.473------------------162.06--------- Full length Vallon cable to electronics input.

    (2) 3.9------------------- 1.506------------------207.66---------RG58 coax.

    (3) 3.4------------------- 1.455------------------183.49---------RG58

    (4) 3.2------------------- 1.512------------------174.45---------RG58

    (5) 3.7------------------- 1.435------------------173.97---------RG58 with orange polyurethane outer. (underwater version).

    (6) 4.2------------------- 1.798------------------179.36---------RG58

    The Vallon coil (1) has the lowest resonant frequency and I wonder how important this is. Also, it is the only coil that uses Scotch 24 wire mesh as a shield, as seen in a cross section from a broken coil, whereas all of mine use woven copper, or nickel plated copper, fabric tape. The Vallon also has a long length of coiled thin coax which would add to the capacitance.
    The probe (6) inductance is rather high and it only worked with the addition of 1 ohm in series with the winding. Very stable and low noise pickup as a result.

    The new mystery is that the Vallon coil will not detect a 1" square of kitchen foil anywhere, but my 12" coil does. No great range, but a definite 1" on the coil axis and also signals positive adjacent to the coil edge. It is a true mono and not wound as a dual field as the shell might suggest.

    Eric.

    [ATTACH]44707[/ATTACH]
    (1) calculates 750 ohm Rd, (3) calculates 839 ohm Rd. (pi*L*F res) KingJL schematic reply#1749 has Rd at 800 ohms. Would that difference be enough to cause (1) to not detect the foil?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ferric Toes
    replied
    Vallon Coil Tests

    Originally posted by MTammet View Post
    Sorry, found no answer for my question. I have coils 0.8 mH; 1.14 mH, 1.26 mH, 1.36 mH; 1.56 mH they all work with my Vallon. Only one 1.26 mH refuses to work with one of my Vallons made in 2008 it works with Vallons made 2009 and 2010. Thank you anyway I will make my measurements according to the schematic and TP-s you provided.
    I decided to test the various coils I have made for the Vallon to see what the spread in resistance, inductance, and resonant frequency is. Coils tested were (1) the stock 6 x 10 inch truncated elliptical that comes with the Vallon. (2) 15 inch, (3) 12 inch, (4) 7 inch, (5) 9 x 4.5 elliptical and (6) the ferrite cored probe.

    Resistance ohms------- Inductance mH------- Resonant f kHz.

    (1) 3.5------------------- 1.473------------------162.06--------- Full length Vallon cable to electronics input.

    (2) 3.9------------------- 1.506------------------207.66---------RG58 coax.

    (3) 3.4------------------- 1.455------------------183.49---------RG58

    (4) 3.2------------------- 1.512------------------174.45---------RG58

    (5) 3.7------------------- 1.435------------------173.97---------RG58 with orange polyurethane outer. (underwater version).

    (6) 4.2------------------- 1.798------------------179.36---------RG58

    The Vallon coil (1) has the lowest resonant frequency and I wonder how important this is. Also, it is the only coil that uses Scotch 24 wire mesh as a shield, as seen in a cross section from a broken coil, whereas all of mine use woven copper, or nickel plated copper, fabric tape. The Vallon also has a long length of coiled thin coax which would add to the capacitance.
    The probe (6) inductance is rather high and it only worked with the addition of 1 ohm in series with the winding. Very stable and low noise pickup as a result.

    The new mystery is that the Vallon coil will not detect a 1" square of kitchen foil anywhere, but my 12" coil does. No great range, but a definite 1" on the coil axis and also signals positive adjacent to the coil edge. It is a true mono and not wound as a dual field as the shell might suggest.

    Eric.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Vallon Coils.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	124.5 KB
ID:	352571

    Leave a comment:


  • MTammet
    replied
    Sorry, found no answer for my question. I have coils 0.8 mH; 1.14 mH, 1.26 mH, 1.36 mH; 1.56 mH they all work with my Vallon. Only one 1.26 mH refuses to work with one of my Vallons made in 2008 it works with Vallons made 2009 and 2010. Thank you anyway I will make my measurements according to the schematic and TP-s you provided.

    Leave a comment:


  • KingJL
    replied
    Originally posted by MTammet View Post
    Made test with 10 inch (26 cm) coil. No response in my case. Have you analysed Vallon damping circuit? What are the best inductance windows for search coils? I think there are certain windows where damping is more effective.

    Mihkel
    See post 1479 ( https://www.geotech1.com/forums/show...688#post244688 )

    Leave a comment:


  • MTammet
    replied
    Originally posted by KingJL View Post
    Some more tweaking and I can detect 1" square at 1 3/4" - 1 7/8" with 10 1/4 in coil. My test environment is plagued with EMI. positioning for minimum interference and reducing gain to 8 LED's, I was able to detect while moving across target. But stopping even for a second the response ceased. This is inline with other findings that I have noticed... the Vallon is most sensitive to an increasing target signal. I also noticed this behavior when modeling the Vallon integrator.
    Made test with 10 inch (26 cm) coil. No response in my case. Have you analysed Vallon damping circuit? What are the best inductance windows for search coils? I think there are certain windows where damping is more effective.

    Mihkel

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X