Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Vallon VMH3CS Mine Detector
Collapse
X
-
Close to Mount Magnet so its not coincidenceOriginally posted by Ferric Toes View PostHere is a picture of the samples. Those that jump to a magnet on the left. Those that have little or no attraction on the right. Those on the left also give a strong deflection on a compass needle, although they may have aquired remanent magnetism when I separated them.
Eric.
Comment
-
Eric: Somewhere I saw an elipticle coil you had wound in a clam shell style body. Could you modify the coil inside one of those shells to be 2" x 10" mono and would that give him the knife blade effect I think he wants and would it have any depth?
Carolina
Comment
-
Not sure that would help as the more concentrated TX field would give a bigger signal from the hot rocks which I presume are mostly near the surface.Originally posted by Carolina View PostEric: Somewhere I saw an elipticle coil you had wound in a clam shell style body. Could you modify the coil inside one of those shells to be 2" x 10" mono and would that give him the knife blade effect I think he wants and would it have any depth?
Carolina
Eric.
Comment
-
-
Rain is not necessarily a bad thing. I have found that the ground gets quieter after rain. This is because the signal amplitude of ironstone and, also the decay time, varies with temperature. On a hot day the ironstone on the surface heats up, particularly if it is a dark brown to black colour. Lighter colour ironstone does not change as much, or ironstone that is in the shade or under the surface. Rain evens out the temperature differences so the spread of amplitude and decay times become less and the GB has less variation to compensate for. Same when it is dark and when the temperature drops. The other benefit is that the snakes are less active.Originally posted by kingswood View PostHad 25mm of rain yesterday....to wet to get out
!
Hoping things dry out for tomorrow!
I have plotted out the decays of the two groups of ironstone that you sent and there is a difference. Will post plots shortly.
Eric.
Comment
-
Interesting results Eric....Not sure what that all means
As for the rain, dont mind detecting after it, its just that after rain it takes a while for the huge puddles to drain, so we are left with very muddy bush tracks
!!
I didnt want to get stranded if it rained even more...and it did, another 5 mm!
Crossing fingers I can get out to where I want to go today
Comment
-
Hi Green,Originally posted by green View PostHi Eric, did you test the rocks whole or crushed?
Those results were from two whole rocks. There is a lot more that could be done, such as plotting graphs for each specimen to see if there was a consistent difference between the two groups. The starting amplitude was set at 1000 arbitrary units at 10uS delay for both rocks by adjusting the gain of the test instrument.
Eric.
Comment
-
Glad to see you doing some rock testing. I have some ground and 2 hot rocks from California. Sometime the rocks cancel with the same settings as ground, sometimes a small change. Did some tests to see what I could learn when I saw you were going to test some rocks. The rocks have a lot more X than R signal compared to ground. Is that typical? Charted some decay curves, ground with film container and small coil charted the same slope as ground in bag with large coil. Had to use small coil and post amp to get enough signal to chart the rocks. They charted a steeper slope than ground but when I charted integrator out signal change with the large coil, the rocks cancelled the same as ground. Tried with 5.6, 6, and 7usec first delay. Ground and rocks cancelled at 6 and 7usec delay. Large rock had about 4 counts when ground cancelled at 5.6usec delay. I can disable target sample or ground sample with the bench detector. Disabling target sample, integrator out reads the same change opposite polarity as target sample so the integrator seems to be working. The faster slopes I'm getting with the small coil don't make sense. The 1.5inch coil is to small to insert the rocks. Any ideas why I'm charting steeper slopes? Maybe something to try. I've read ground from different locations have a similar decay slope, ground from California and my backyard are close. Would you expect hot rocks to have a large or small slope difference? Are your hot rocks easily detectable with your detectors after ground balancing?Originally posted by Ferric Toes View PostHi Green,
Those results were from two whole rocks. There is a lot more that could be done, such as plotting graphs for each specimen to see if there was a consistent difference between the two groups. The starting amplitude was set at 1000 arbitrary units at 10uS delay for both rocks by adjusting the gain of the test instrument.
Eric.Attached Files
Comment
-
The ones I posted Eric all were detected with the VallonOriginally posted by green View PostAre your hot rocks easily detectable with your detectors after ground balancing?
Even with good GB, they caused a nice signal.
I was able to GB to the rock directly, but then the rest of the ground became very noisy. The annoying thing about the rocks from this particular area, is that it is littered with identical looking rocks, but not all of them cause a response....So you are kind of forced to dig every signal, which so far have all been hot rocks
It would be nice if the highly mineralized rocks that cause a signal were all green or something so I could actually identify them easier ha ha
Comment
-
Just a general question, the larger the mono, the less sensitive it should be to hot rocks??
I must admit I have only used the 30cm coil a few times, but dont remember digging as many rocks as I do with the std coil...
I will try the 30cm coil out there next time....
If I reduced the sensitivity, would the hot rock detection reduce also??
Comment

Comment