LOOKING FOR GOLDSCAN 4 Schematic.

[Melbeta]

respect

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! KT315, did not have that one schematic. YOU HAVE MY RESPECT, we know each other don't we???
MELBETA

[pito]

During that meter of movement, the RX has sampled 500 times so each sample span sees what looks like a DC offset. = sample every 2 mm , that is good but most of the time EFE is 0V so DC offset is not precise. ?

[Carl-NC]

Your guess is better than good!
Yes the sample delay is 30uS, quite correct. And that is the minimum on the potentiometer.

... will need the tweaking on all 4 monostables.
I might need a help here...

The first thing to do is reduce the main sample delay. This is controlled by R18,C15 and the 2 pots. Set both pots to zero and reduce R18 if needed to achieve 6us, then trim it up to 10us with RV2. Then, if you wind an aggressive coil you can trim it back down to 6us.

There are 4 sample pulses, I call them TGT, TGT-EFE, GND, and GND-EFE. (TGT is the Gold channel, GND is the Iron channel)
U5a sets the delay of TGT with R18*C15
U5b sets the delay of TGT-EFE with R22*C17
U7a sets the delay of GND with R15*C4
U7b sets the delay of GND-EFE with R21*C16
U8a,b sets the widths of TGT, TGT-EFE
U9a,b sets the widths of GND, GND-EFE

Eric runs all the samples with the same pulse width. This is set by (R19+R20)*C19 and triggers U8,U9 through diodes D4-D7. It is important that the width of TGT and TGT-EFE match, and the width of GND and GND-EFE match. But TGT and GND don't need to match. My preference is to run the GND width much wider than the TGT width, this reduces the noise of the GND channel. To do this, disconnect D5,D6 from the other diodes and add a new RC to from U9-pin1 to ground with D5,D6 connected to the C, exactly in the same manner as R19+R20,C19. That will give you independent control of the GND pulse width. A wider GND pulse effectively increases its gain so that R52 may not be needed.

If you really want an education, set up all of these RCs with pots so that you can dynamically vary them and try different settings, seeing how various timings affects GB, target hole, and sensitivity. That was the purpose of the Hammerhead project, and it's easy to do here as well. You can do the same with frequency and TX width by partially replacing R7 with a pot. Be very careful with frequency and TX width as there are combinations that will burn up the FET. Also, it is possible to increase the frequency so that the EFE pulses end up in the TX-on cycle or even beyond.

I think with the resistor trick you can monitor all 5 pulses, since none of them are on at the same time. I will have to use this myself as even with a 4 channel oscope I often find myself wanting to monitor multiple timing pulses, plus some analog signals. I can put all the timing on one channel, and have 3 left for analog.

[Carl-NC]

The EFE spacing will need adjusting = EFE is a signal from the Earth's magnetic field when the direction of movement of the detector coil changes, but this sampling is not synchronized with the movement of the coil, so the chance that the pulse will appear when the direction of movement of the coil changes is very small.

The signal created from EFE has a frequency exactly equal to the swing rate of the coil, which might be 1m/s. During that meter of movement, the RX has sampled 500 times so each sample span sees what looks like a DC offset. This offset is what gets cancelled by the EFE sample, so it's not important to synchronize to the sweep rate. If the pulse rate was far lower (like 5Hz) then synchronizing would be important.

[pito]

I might need a help here...= all of these pulses can be easy produced by stm32f103

[ivconic]

Haha I wasn't sure that resistor trick would work, just a guess. Worked great!
It looks like the TX is 200us (maybe a little more) at 500Hz. For high conductor coins the pulse width is good, but I would heat sink the FET and double the pulse rate.
The sample delay looks to be 30us which is way too high. You should be able to easily run 10-12us and with a good coil down to 6-8us. This will help sensitivity, especially for lower conductors but even high conductors.
You can also do better on the GB timing. Here is what I would try:

TX period = 1ms
TX width = 200us
Tgt delay = 10us
Tgt width = 20us
Gnd delay = 30us
Gnd width = 80us

The EFE spacing will need adjusting and R52 may need to be shorted.

Your guess is better than good!
Even 3 pulses can be "caught" at the same time with the help of a trick.
And now as I watch this... I could try the others on the second channel, sync on the first channel, align both channels...
and get the timings as one oscillogram! I'm not sure it will work; but i will try.
But it's still good like this, you can clearly see the times. Your estimates are correct.
Yes the sample delay is 30uS, quite correct. And that is the minimum on the potentiometer.
And you're right again, when I turn the potentiometer and increase the sample delay; the detection of coins drops rapidly until
the moment when the coil no longer sees a coin at all. (Rough but good enough method to define TC of targets!!!... Wow! Ideas just keep flooding!)
For the purpose of searching for such small targets; the need for a potentiometer is lost, I can put a simple jumper and omit the potentiometer.
But if I change the timing, according to your "scenario", it might be better to keep the potentiometer for later.
Or...later when I establish a few "swetspots" around the delay; in imitation of Pulse Star 2: I can put a switch with a couple of precise fixed resistances.
I even like that a lot more. Because fixed resistors are more reliable than potentiometers. And there is no need for more than just a few states. There are 4 on PS2.
A good trick is an additional toggle switch for quick checking between low and high conductors. Some kind of pseudo-discrimination!
I like the "scenario" and will try to do so!

TX period = 1ms = 1kHz = 1000 PPS
TX width = 200us = stays the same
This is simple NE555 tweaking, alright.
So far easy.
But this:
Tgt delay = 10us
Tgt width = 20us
Gnd delay = 30us
Gnd width = 80us
... will need the tweaking on all 4 monostables.
I might need a help here...

[pito]

The EFE spacing will need adjusting = EFE is a signal from the Earth's magnetic field when the direction of movement of the detector coil changes, but this sampling is not synchronized with the movement of the coil, so the chance that the pulse will appear when the direction of movement of the coil changes is very small.

Between changing directions EFE = 0V

Earth's magnetic;
When moving the PI coil in the air, I did not notice any voltage on it due to the Earth's magnetic field, the coil has too few turns, my magnetometer coil has 30,000 turns (Magnetometer with a rotating coil)

[Carl-NC]

Haha I wasn't sure that resistor trick would work, just a guess. Worked great!
It looks like the TX is 200us (maybe a little more) at 500Hz. For high conductor coins the pulse width is good, but I would heat sink the FET and double the pulse rate.
The sample delay looks to be 30us which is way too high. You should be able to easily run 10-12us and with a good coil down to 6-8us. This will help sensitivity, especially for lower conductors but even high conductors.
You can also do better on the GB timing. Here is what I would try:

TX period = 1ms
TX width = 200us
Tgt delay = 10us
Tgt width = 20us
Gnd delay = 30us
Gnd width = 80us

The EFE spacing will need adjusting and R52 may need to be shorted.

[pito]

I don't know why you insist on this coil = I am preparing myself to build my first PI detector, starting with building the best coil for it, so far I'm not satisfied even that I have 350V, compared to your coil 140V .
I'm trying to get on oscilloscope respond to the coin on the output of the first amplifier (pin #6 of U11), but I have nothing.
I have respond to 10x10 cm iron plate but not to the coin.

Your wire is about 1 mm in diameter and have resistance higher than my 0.5 magnet wire ?

[ivconic]

The next thing I tried today (more for the sake of order) ...
and with this I finish with larger diameter coil attempts; is this, it also works very badly!
So, the only solution I can think of is a coil under 20cm...





So far I have done many PI coils for Delta Pulse, FelezJoo PI, Barracuda, SurfPi, recently a few for Pulse Star 2...
I have NEVER had a problem with it working perfectly fine.
Obviously this is a whole different "beast"... a whole new area for me...
Too large horseschmitt... if you ask me!

[ivconic]

@Carl:

[ivconic]

my coil, 35T, wire 0.5, 1.7 ohms, 0.58 uH, 0.35 V = your coil has similar inductance but much higher resistance, what is the diameter of your wire, is it copper wire?

I don't know why you insist on that coil, it turned out to be bad in working with the detector.

[pito]

my coil, 35T, wire 0.5, 1.7 ohms, 0.58 uH, 0.35 V = your coil has similar inductance but much higher resistance, what is the diameter of your wire, is it copper wire?

[ivconic]

OK, I see now. OFF is AM mode, AM is "Low+High" GB mode, and SEL1 & SEL2 are LOW-only GB modes, I assume with different timings.

Connect a 10k resistor to the gate of Q4, and a 10k resistor to the gate of Q8. Connect the 2 resistors together, and feed that to the oscope. You should be able to figure out the sample delay from that. Move the second resistor to other sample gates to get the other timing.

Will do.
My appetites are growing and I am now realizing the need for a 4/8 channel digital oscilloscope.

[ivconic]

Comparison 1mm wire and 0.5 wire
coil 25 turns, 22 cm diameter
1 mm wire, 290 uH,0.7 Ohm, 0.45V
0.5mm wire, 260 uH,1.3 Ohm, 0.42V
very small difference in Tx power

how many turns has your red coil ?

----------------------------------------------------
coil, 35T, 0.5 wire, 1.7Ohm, 0.58 uH, 0.35V

So... 35 I think, lost count. It was random try, just to see what do I get from full length of that cable.
Of course it is useless try.
Carl pointed one thing and I will follow that in next attempts, because it correlates to what I really expect from this detector; it is smaller diameter coil.
Probably less than or close to 20cm diam.
Will try to find proper wire for 0.3mH and 3.5 ohms resistance for such coil.
End goal is to detect mentioned coins at 15-25cm in soil... if possible.
With such smaller coil. I don't need anything better then that.
Of course if that is possible.