Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PROJECT ETI566

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by zixelll
    Thanks for your help in making the coils will get more help
    Detail of the secondary coil of the transmitter.
    206 1/2 turns (6 1/2 + 35 + 165).
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Figura1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	220.9 KB
ID:	333905

    Detail the primary. Two lengths of wire paralleled.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06370.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	543.5 KB
ID:	333906

    The others coils has the similar construction.
    Measurements taken with the coils inside the potcore

    Comment


    • #32
      Thank you my friend how to wrap the two coils so.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by zixelll View Post
        Thank you my friend how to wrap the two coils so.
        This have to be easiest part of whole construction. Thanks to transformer used, coils are one wire loop only.

        Comment


        • #34
          Winding means that you have the right figure for the third winding circuit used the same formula in the form described above, thank you

          Comment


          • #35
            If you are referring to the L2 (receiver). The scheme is the same winding suggested above;
            225 1/2 turns
            1 step initial point
            2 step + 25 1/2 turns - 2.20 uh
            3 step + 200 turns - approximately 16 mh.
            Measurements taken with the coils inside the potcore.
            There is also the "adjust" for the potcore, as may be seen in the image.
            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06374.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	333921

            detail
            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06378.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.04 MB
ID:	333922

            Comment


            • #36
              Thank you so much my friend I'm living in Iran as sanctions here we're not gonna take this size pot core pieces to be stuck on the easier to remember

              Comment


              • #37
                Thank you Baterista for your post!
                I can only get ceramic trimmers upto 70pf in my place.
                Did you use FM Tuning Capacitor-Gang Capacitor for trimmer ? Do they have any capacitance value mentioned?
                Can you suggest where to get trimmers?

                Also i can't find Q4, Q5, Q7 - BC559/BC179
                Any substitutes?
                Thanks!

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by mindfree
                  Thank you Baterista for your post!
                  I can only get ceramic trimmers upto 70pf in my place.
                  Did you use FM Tuning Capacitor-Gang Capacitor for trimmer ? Do they have any capacitance value mentioned?
                  Can you suggest where to get trimmers?

                  Also i can't find Q4, Q5, Q7 - BC559/BC179
                  Any substitutes?
                  Thanks!
                  Yes, I used this variable capacitor for tuning FM radio(scrap parts), this type of component is not easy to find in stores,
                  they are usually for 350 to 450 pF, looking at the picture there are 4 capacitors, each with a different value
                  (C1, C2, C3 and C4), in my measurements I C1 and C2 always found above 250 pF and C3 and C4 of 50 pF below,
                  measurements are made with the "COM" on the leg between C1 and C2.
                  As for the BC559 is an silicon transistor PNP common use, may be substituted by;
                  BC559, BC557, BC513, BC514, BC560, BC214, BC309, BC259,
                  2SA709, etc..
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06435.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	553.5 KB
ID:	334216

                  Leg used as a "com" measurement.
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06437.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	509.1 KB
ID:	334217

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Thanks you!
                    Will this detector work near a radio station broadcasting AM / FM?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by mindfree
                      Thanks you!
                      Will this detector work near a radio station broadcasting AM / FM?
                      I think not, I have not had this problem, but high voltage cables and transformers can cause interference.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Baterista View Post
                        If I understand the question well. Concerning to depth:
                        My field tests are done in the same place for all projects.
                        Pieces of iron, forming a block of 17 cubic centimeters, buried one meter deep.
                        And for this project has a clear and strong signal.
                        Has not yet been made a maximum depth test.
                        Need to dig, dig, dig ...

                        Hi.
                        Congratulation for your project.
                        Before many years i constructed it. It was a good project with good depth but not magic results.
                        I compared it with a Gemini III and the gemini was better so i keep the Gemini and let it.
                        Again congratulation for the so good constuction

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Hi Baterista

                          As far I remember you post a photo of whole detector in your first post here. I don't know if it is only on my browser, but I cannot see those photo any-more?

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Geo
                            Hi.
                            Congratulation for your project.
                            Before many years i constructed it. It was a good project with good depth but not magic results.
                            I compared it with a Gemini III and the gemini was better so i keep the Gemini and let it.
                            Again congratulation for the so good constuction
                            Thanks Geo, I will soon post more results and maybe a video.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by WM6
                              Hi Baterista

                              As far I remember you post a photo of whole detector in your first post here. I don't know if it is only on my browser, but I cannot see those photo any-more?
                              Yeah, I do not know what happened, I thought the image had disappeared only to me, anyway I'll repost the photo.
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06083.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	755.2 KB
ID:	334229

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Baterista View Post
                                Yeah, I do not know what happened, I thought the image had disappeared only to me, anyway I'll repost the photo.
                                [ATTACH]22336[/ATTACH]

                                Yesssss..... perfect!!!!!!!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X