Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IDX-PRO+VDI

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • reiv
    replied
    Post #178, by the way those type of cappacitors it is not good choice, better will be MKT type.

    Leave a comment:


  • joop
    replied
    By the way, anyone know how to adjust VR3 (phase)?

    Leave a comment:


  • joop
    replied
    I just finished building the IDX-PRO using the PCB from silverdog's shop. I discovered 2 small bugs on the silkscreen. There are 2 BC547's drawn on the component side which replace the BC237 in the original schematic. Q2, part of the oscillator has E and C swapped but the transistor housing is correct. Q3, just before the last audio stage has the correct E, B and C but the housing has been rotated 180 degrees.

    Here's my finished build. Next I plan to start on the VDI.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	img_0001.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	153.0 KB
ID:	335173

    Leave a comment:


  • Daxxin
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	idx_ecd.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	47.0 KB
ID:	335168

    Just finish to etch idx pcb ..made 2 boards ..i have printed from WhitesIDX.lay file it was the correct version? i seen some differences with
    silverdog schematic.

    Leave a comment:


  • jap
    replied
    Hi spookyspy
    -Good work,,,,try to use Proteus 7.10 will help you a lot in completing the project and the possibility of experiment and modification.
    best time
    j.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nicolas
    replied
    Originally posted by spookyspy View Post
    Well, I'm experimenting with a pic processor to calculate the VDI by direct sampling of the signal. Thus not using the x/y. My goal is to use only the TX and RX part and do all the logic in the processor. So discrimination and all other logic will be in the software. As far for now i'm able to calculate the fase and signal strength. On my youtube video http://youtu.be/c-W6HwcI-Ec you can see the raw results. Notice some fluttering but thats because i'm using a pc based signal processor with a unamplified signal straight into the pic. Some opamps needed here to push the signal up to 5 volts or so. Sampling was the hard part, all other logic is just programming the software. to be continued.
    Hi Spookyspy

    Nice job ..can you put that in Geotech forum my congratulation

    Leave a comment:


  • eduardo1979
    replied
    Originally posted by spookyspy View Post
    Well, I'm experimenting with a pic processor to calculate the VDI by direct sampling of the signal. Thus not using the x/y. My goal is to use only the TX and RX part and do all the logic in the processor. So discrimination and all other logic will be in the software. As far for now i'm able to calculate the fase and signal strength. On my youtube video http://youtu.be/c-W6HwcI-Ec you can see the raw results. Notice some fluttering but thats because i'm using a pc based signal processor with a unamplified signal straight into the pic. Some opamps needed here to push the signal up to 5 volts or so. Sampling was the hard part, all other logic is just programming the software. to be continued.
    Very interesting! I wish you much success with your project. Greetings, Eduardo.

    Leave a comment:


  • spookyspy
    replied
    Well, I'm experimenting with a pic processor to calculate the VDI by direct sampling of the signal. Thus not using the x/y. My goal is to use only the TX and RX part and do all the logic in the processor. So discrimination and all other logic will be in the software. As far for now i'm able to calculate the fase and signal strength. On my youtube video http://youtu.be/c-W6HwcI-Ec you can see the raw results. Notice some fluttering but thats because i'm using a pc based signal processor with a unamplified signal straight into the pic. Some opamps needed here to push the signal up to 5 volts or so. Sampling was the hard part, all other logic is just programming the software. to be continued.

    Leave a comment:


  • dfbowers
    replied
    The nice thing is that you can easily change parameters, especially with sampling. My next step was to add a few subroutines to average coil sweeps to improve accuracy even more. I have done some actual field testing and the only drawback is that the lcd is difficult to see in sunlight. It would be nice to see someone take the whole experiment to the next level.
    Don..

    Leave a comment:


  • hamidrt
    replied
    OK dfbowers. In fact I have not Arduino Micro but I can program a ATMEGA from source code. I see you provide some source code in C language. I hope to compile it by CodeVision for Atmega8 with some changes in pin configuration and use TL072 for X,Y input.
    You are right. VDI is only a math calculation on phases. So I should do it myself with your source. Is it true?
    Also, I see video of your project in youtube. Great job! Specially about name of metals that appeared on lcd.
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dfbowers
    replied
    Originally posted by hamidrt View Post
    Thank you dfbowers
    Of course I can find many atmega ics. But I need a specific hex file or source code for this project! It seems that vdi is different. Are these 2 project the same? Which of them may be better?
    Can you be a little more "specific" about what specific hex file you are looking for? Experiment #1 does the same thing.. calculates the arctan between the two channels. If you have an Arduino, just load it and away you go.. It runs just fine on an Arduino Micro too - The same size as a stick chewing gum. The only thing I am missing are a pair of op amps to isolate the Arduino, although it works just fine by itself.

    Leave a comment:


  • hamidrt
    replied
    Thank you dfbowers
    Of course I can find many atmega ics. But I need a specific hex file or source code for this project! It seems that vdi is different. Are these 2 project the same? Which of them may be better?

    Leave a comment:


  • dfbowers
    replied
    Originally posted by hamidrt View Post
    Hi
    I am interested for this nice project specially about VDI section. Many thanks.
    However I have a big problem about PIC micro controller 16F88 or 16F690. Unfortunately in my country, not any of these chips could be found!
    Can you suggest me any solution? I think VDI may be reprogrammed with ATMEGA chips that are very common, or at least for another common PIC micro.
    Thanks
    It can be done easily. Maybe use an Arduino UNO to program an ATMEGA328P?
    General tech discussions on all types of metal detectors: VLF, 2-box, BFO, off-resonance, PLL, etc. Questions, ideas, and anything else that moves you.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • hamidrt
    replied
    Hi
    I am interested for this nice project specially about VDI section. Many thanks.
    However I have a big problem about PIC micro controller 16F88 or 16F690. Unfortunately in my country, not any of these chips could be found!
    Can you suggest me any solution? I think VDI may be reprogrammed with ATMEGA chips that are very common, or at least for another common PIC micro.
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • golfnut
    replied
    Originally posted by kalinvd1 View Post
    Who puts OP177 or NE 5534?
    Both of them have.
    Some ferrite is hard to reject - especially in a ring shape. Try short piece of rod from AM radio.

    GEB is for 'tuning out the returns from the soil. - without this set it will false.

    PP is pin pointer, this mode is close to non motion, it uses a Rx channel with a zero IF. For getting location fix on target prior to dig.

    I think popular is 5534

    S

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X