Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
IDX-PRO+VDI
Collapse
X
-
Post #178, by the way those type of cappacitors it is not good choice, better will be MKT type.
-
I just finished building the IDX-PRO using the PCB from silverdog's shop. I discovered 2 small bugs on the silkscreen. There are 2 BC547's drawn on the component side which replace the BC237 in the original schematic. Q2, part of the oscillator has E and C swapped but the transistor housing is correct. Q3, just before the last audio stage has the correct E, B and C but the housing has been rotated 180 degrees.
Here's my finished build. Next I plan to start on the VDI.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Hi spookyspy
-Good work,,,,try to use Proteus 7.10 will help you a lot in completing the project and the possibility of experiment and modification.
best time
j.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi SpookyspyOriginally posted by spookyspy View PostWell, I'm experimenting with a pic processor to calculate the VDI by direct sampling of the signal. Thus not using the x/y. My goal is to use only the TX and RX part and do all the logic in the processor. So discrimination and all other logic will be in the software. As far for now i'm able to calculate the fase and signal strength. On my youtube video http://youtu.be/c-W6HwcI-Ec you can see the raw results. Notice some fluttering but thats because i'm using a pc based signal processor with a unamplified signal straight into the pic. Some opamps needed here to push the signal up to 5 volts or so. Sampling was the hard part, all other logic is just programming the software. to be continued.
Nice job ..can you put that in Geotech forum my congratulation
Leave a comment:
-
Very interesting! I wish you much success with your project. Greetings, Eduardo.Originally posted by spookyspy View PostWell, I'm experimenting with a pic processor to calculate the VDI by direct sampling of the signal. Thus not using the x/y. My goal is to use only the TX and RX part and do all the logic in the processor. So discrimination and all other logic will be in the software. As far for now i'm able to calculate the fase and signal strength. On my youtube video http://youtu.be/c-W6HwcI-Ec you can see the raw results. Notice some fluttering but thats because i'm using a pc based signal processor with a unamplified signal straight into the pic. Some opamps needed here to push the signal up to 5 volts or so. Sampling was the hard part, all other logic is just programming the software. to be continued.
Leave a comment:
-
Well, I'm experimenting with a pic processor to calculate the VDI by direct sampling of the signal. Thus not using the x/y. My goal is to use only the TX and RX part and do all the logic in the processor. So discrimination and all other logic will be in the software. As far for now i'm able to calculate the fase and signal strength. On my youtube video http://youtu.be/c-W6HwcI-Ec you can see the raw results. Notice some fluttering but thats because i'm using a pc based signal processor with a unamplified signal straight into the pic. Some opamps needed here to push the signal up to 5 volts or so. Sampling was the hard part, all other logic is just programming the software. to be continued.
Leave a comment:
-
The nice thing is that you can easily change parameters, especially with sampling. My next step was to add a few subroutines to average coil sweeps to improve accuracy even more. I have done some actual field testing and the only drawback is that the lcd is difficult to see in sunlight. It would be nice to see someone take the whole experiment to the next level.
Don..
Leave a comment:
-
OK dfbowers. In fact I have not Arduino Micro but I can program a ATMEGA from source code. I see you provide some source code in C language. I hope to compile it by CodeVision for Atmega8 with some changes in pin configuration and use TL072 for X,Y input.
You are right. VDI is only a math calculation on phases. So I should do it myself with your source. Is it true?
Also, I see video of your project in youtube. Great job! Specially about name of metals that appeared on lcd.
Thanks
Leave a comment:
-
Can you be a little more "specific" about what specific hex file you are looking for? Experiment #1 does the same thing.. calculates the arctan between the two channels. If you have an Arduino, just load it and away you go.. It runs just fine on an Arduino Micro too - The same size as a stick chewing gum. The only thing I am missing are a pair of op amps to isolate the Arduino, although it works just fine by itself.
Leave a comment:
-
It can be done easily. Maybe use an Arduino UNO to program an ATMEGA328P?Originally posted by hamidrt View PostHi
I am interested for this nice project specially about VDI section. Many thanks.
However I have a big problem about PIC micro controller 16F88 or 16F690. Unfortunately in my country, not any of these chips could be found!
Can you suggest me any solution? I think VDI may be reprogrammed with ATMEGA chips that are very common, or at least for another common PIC micro.
Thanks
Leave a comment:
-
Hi
I am interested for this nice project specially about VDI section. Many thanks.
However I have a big problem about PIC micro controller 16F88 or 16F690. Unfortunately in my country, not any of these chips could be found!
Can you suggest me any solution? I think VDI may be reprogrammed with ATMEGA chips that are very common, or at least for another common PIC micro.
Thanks
Leave a comment:
-
Some ferrite is hard to reject - especially in a ring shape. Try short piece of rod from AM radio.Originally posted by kalinvd1 View PostWho puts OP177 or NE 5534?
Both of them have.
GEB is for 'tuning out the returns from the soil. - without this set it will false.
PP is pin pointer, this mode is close to non motion, it uses a Rx channel with a zero IF. For getting location fix on target prior to dig.
I think popular is 5534
S
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: