Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IDX-PRO+VDI

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mohandes
    replied
    Originally posted by golfnut View Post
    Firsly you have D3 crossed out in the schematic....

    You will need this..

    Most have a IN4148 in here... as per silk screen - You can use a 2v7 zener also - fit as per the schematic ( i.e. The zener would go one way around, the dide must go the other way around. ) I think we covered this before, twice




    The Disc pot when set CW will reject Iron
    The Disc pot when set CCW will NOT reject Iron

    The Geb pot when set correctly will reject ferrite

    I call the Sens pot the Threshold whish is very confusing I apologise.
    The pot tha goes to the two comparators - this sets up a small positive DC level for which signals on BOTH Disc and GEB channels must exceed for a tone.

    the pot at the top has its main use when in PP - if set too high the tone rings out continuously. So in PP require to back it off CCW so just no tone.
    IN Disc mode leave this pot CW almost fully. This puts more positive DC bias on MPSA13 base - so closer to loud conduction. Works a bit like volume in Disc mode, It does reduce volume of HIT if set CCW
    i take more photo
    please help
    i have not 2,7volt for D3 and use 2.4volt.
    THANK you golfnut but i dont mean the professional the main words like : CW and CCW(so sorry man)

    please see :

    First pic , yellow is U1-pin6 and blue is U8-pin1
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DS0000.BMP
Views:	1
Size:	17.2 KB
ID:	338113
    seond pic , yellow is U1-pin6 and blue is U8-7
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DS0001.BMP
Views:	1
Size:	17.5 KB
ID:	338114
    third ,yellow is U8-1and blue is U8-7
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DS0020.BMP
Views:	1
Size:	15.8 KB
ID:	338115
    forth , yellow U1-pin3 and blue U1-pin6
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DS0026.BMP
Views:	1
Size:	16.6 KB
ID:	338111
    fifth , blue is U7-pin1 (it is not 400hz,how i adjust it ???????)
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DS0027.BMP
Views:	1
Size:	18.4 KB
ID:	338112

    EDIT :
    my detector have a very bad depth,how i an improve it

    Leave a comment:


  • golfnut
    replied
    Firsly you have D3 crossed out in the schematic....

    You will need this..

    Most have a IN4148 in here... as per silk screen - You can use a 2v7 zener also - fit as per the schematic ( i.e. The zener would go one way around, the dide must go the other way around. ) I think we covered this before, twice




    The Disc pot when set CW will reject Iron
    The Disc pot when set CCW will NOT reject Iron

    The Geb pot when set correctly will reject ferrite

    I call the Sens pot the Threshold whish is very confusing I apologise.
    The pot tha goes to the two comparators - this sets up a small positive DC level for which signals on BOTH Disc and GEB channels must exceed for a tone.

    the pot at the top has its main use when in PP - if set too high the tone rings out continuously. So in PP require to back it off CCW so just no tone.
    IN Disc mode leave this pot CW almost fully. This puts more positive DC bias on MPSA13 base - so closer to loud conduction. Works a bit like volume in Disc mode, It does reduce volume of HIT if set CCW

    Leave a comment:


  • wlewis
    replied
    Originally posted by xlev View Post
    Has anyone in Australia built this for gold prospeting? If so, how does it perform in mineralized soil?
    Very relevant question. It seems the 'IGSL TGSL' is better suited for highly mineralized areas.. the schematic shows disc (discard?) and 'fe' block options. Any suggestions are welcome.

    Leave a comment:


  • mohandes
    replied
    Hi all
    i explain all things that say in befor post in this pic please look and tell me :
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IDX_SCH%20-%20Copy.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	548.9 KB
ID:	338109Click image for larger version

Name:	IDXpcbfront.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	92.6 KB
ID:	338110

    Leave a comment:


  • mohandes
    replied
    please say me how work by pots
    GEB
    THERSHOLD
    DISC 100k
    disc 10K
    regards

    i remove 470 ohm and connect 4.7k bitween pin6&7 U4 and have not sound(ANNIHILATE sound)

    Leave a comment:


  • mohandes
    replied
    Originally posted by Dixix View Post
    Please Help! I have the IDX kit (from Silverdog) soldered. There were a few parts left (multi turn pot VR3 and 2 diodes - some parts were missing (Resistors).

    Now I have found that there is a difference.

    The PCB which is displayed in the shop and what i have soldered. Are there different versions?...

    This is the PCB which I got (and already soldered):

    [ATTACH]26834[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH]26835[/ATTACH]

    This is the PCB shown in the shop:

    [ATTACH]26836[/ATTACH]


    I'm totally confused ....

    Hi all guru
    now i change my pcb like Dixix ,http://www.geotech1.com/forums/attac...4&d=1382242387
    and know just one ? about the U4 and sound,please see this number you know my mean :read all below please

    first idea :
    the first design by eduardo that exist 47 ohm that connection in U4-pin6 and 2 .

    second :

    in number #1245 Mr eduardo says ( 47o ohm instead of 47 ohm) he explains for us that you ATTAIN this value by do this :The resistance value depends on the gain of the comparator (LM393). There comparators with little gain and it takes a lower value for the resistance of 470 ohms. I use a 1K trimmer and so you can adjust the desired gain
    This version is the one that works best for all. I made some small modifications. This is the best it has worked. Enjoy.
    Attached Files



    third :
    in #1252 eduardo says :
    For threshold tone discrimination mode, you have to eliminate the resistance of 470 ohms, and connect a 4K7 resistor between pins 6y7 of U4 (LM393). This way you will get a nice tone threshold discrimination mode. The threshold tone level is adjusted with the potentiometer sensitivity. Greetings. Eduardo.


    forth:
    in #1307 and #1309




    reiv

    Member

    Join DateMay 2012Posts66

    Sure this resistance it`s not critical, just helps to get more linear control of volume. With 2k5 you will get start to hear beeping on "1.5" position of potentiometr (with 1-10 scale) and full of volume at "10". Experiment with this resistance and You will see what is all about




    FINALLY , which is more correct of this items

    thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Koala
    replied
    A smaller coil helps a lot. I have a 10.6" DD and a 8" concentric. On damp sand the 8" works much better. I have been tempted to make a 5" DD and give that a try. You will need a small coil to be sensitive to very small targets .

    Leave a comment:


  • xlev
    replied
    Originally posted by golfnut View Post
    In the uk the soil mineral content is fairly low - east anglia where I am is mainly clay and has low iron content. The IDX works well here - for a basic machine.
    There are pockets of Ironstone deposits -normally on exposed raised small ridges - the IDX does not cope well here. Lots of falses, if the soil has rapidly varying mineral content i.e soil to stone with iron and back ,= the geb will only be set for one of these and will false on the other.

    A second GEB ch could help set at the phase of the heavy mineral and the usual one set for soil.
    Lots of work though.

    In short I dont know as I cant test for it.

    The if black sand in the US has a similar phase response to your local mineral - then your in with a chance - as the original had a black sand setting.

    Carl may furnish you with a more useful answer as his knowledge is greater


    S
    Thanks for the reply. What kind of coil do you use?

    I was thinking that maybe having a DD coil could help with high mineralization?

    Leave a comment:


  • golfnut
    replied
    In the uk the soil mineral content is fairly low - east anglia where I am is mainly clay and has low iron content. The IDX works well here - for a basic machine.
    There are pockets of Ironstone deposits -normally on exposed raised small ridges - the IDX does not cope well here. Lots of falses, if the soil has rapidly varying mineral content i.e soil to stone with iron and back ,= the geb will only be set for one of these and will false on the other.

    A second GEB ch could help set at the phase of the heavy mineral and the usual one set for soil.
    Lots of work though.

    In short I dont know as I cant test for it.

    The if black sand in the US has a similar phase response to your local mineral - then your in with a chance - as the original had a black sand setting.

    Carl may furnish you with a more useful answer as his knowledge is greater


    S

    Leave a comment:


  • Koala
    replied
    Originally posted by xlev View Post
    Has anyone in Australia built this for gold prospeting? If so, how does it perform in mineralized soil?


    Noticed no one has answered your question and it's got bumped down the thread very quickly.

    I don't know. Hopefully someone else can help who has used one of the Classic range in your soil. Did find some good info on VLF for gold prospecting in a PDF do a Google search for "Dave'sGoldbook-printer.pdf".

    It's certainly not designed for this job but don't know if it can be made to work where you are.

    Leave a comment:


  • wlewis
    replied
    Originally posted by Koala View Post
    Yes I built the coil...
    got it.. thanks for the tips.

    Leave a comment:


  • golfnut
    replied
    ,the yellow is Tx and probe on *10, so this voltage is 15.5 volts

    This is fine.



    Blue is Rx and probe is *1, and it is 120mv

    If this is the coil output it is too big -
    Measure it at the preamp output -- this should be 200mV or less.



    the sens volume i put 10K (or better put it 100k ???)

    use the one in the design



    .can i use op27 instead of ne5534?

    Use the 5534 it has gain, stability, and good noise

    Leave a comment:


  • mohandes
    replied
    Finish , now need to help me for adjust pots

    now my detector is working.
    just please tell me about the set pots in this board , my pots like this pic Click image for larger version

Name:	IDX%2520nPRO%2520quick%2520connect_DOROST.JPG
Views:	3
Size:	229.2 KB
ID:	338107

    please help me for final
    regards

    Leave a comment:


  • mohandes
    replied
    Originally posted by golfnut View Post
    DS oo12 looks OK for phase.


    Make sure the coil is away from metal items...

    If coil output it is really 1.5Volts, Then this is TOO BIG and will saturate the preamp.


    I would try and adjust the coil overlap for a smaller voltage.#


    If the Rx volts you display is at the preamp output then 1.5Volts is a little too big.

    Readjust the coil postion to reduce it.

    You may try for the best you can,, then itroduce a small peice of ferrite and move it around the shell to get the best phase and amplitude combination..

    200mV or less is perferct and 180 degrees +/-20 seems OK .

    S

    S
    merci Mr golfnut
    just my speaker have sound (Continue the sound and dont cut)
    for explain more about the pics DS0018 ,the yellow is Tx and probe on *10, so this voltage is 15.5 volts
    Blue is Rx and probe is *1, and it is 120mv

    the sens volume i put 10K (or better put it 100k ???) .can i use op27 instead of ne5534?
    regards

    Leave a comment:


  • golfnut
    replied
    DS oo12 looks OK for phase.


    Make sure the coil is away from metal items...

    If coil output it is really 1.5Volts, Then this is TOO BIG and will saturate the preamp.


    I would try and adjust the coil overlap for a smaller voltage.#


    If the Rx volts you display is at the preamp output then 1.5Volts is a little too big.

    Readjust the coil postion to reduce it.

    You may try for the best you can,, then itroduce a small peice of ferrite and move it around the shell to get the best phase and amplitude combination..

    200mV or less is perferct and 180 degrees +/-20 seems OK .

    S

    S

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X